![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
. | ![]() |
. |
![]() by Staff Writers New York (AFP) March 25, 2016
Apple has said the US government's potential ability to unlock a phone used by one of the San Bernardino killers means the company may not have to provide help in a similar case in New York. The tech giant wrote a letter to a federal court in Brooklyn on Thursday, setting out its position after the government said it may have found a way to crack the shooter's iPhone without Apple's help. Its lawyers asked to delay by at least 10 days a March 31 deadline to respond further in the New York case until after the government submits a report on the status of the San Bernardino phone on April 5. "If that same method can be used to unlock the iPhone in this case, it would eliminate the need for Apple's assistance," the letter said. Similarly, if the government says the method does not work, Apple would want time to test that claim, it added. "Briefly staying the briefing schedule to allow these matters to crystalize is appropriate in light of the public importance of this issue," the lawyers wrote. The phone in the New York case belonged to Jun Feng, who has pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute methamphetamine. In February, Magistrate Judge James Orenstein ruled that police had overstepped the law when they called on Apple to unlock his phone. Judge Margot Brodie is hearing an appeal.
Related Links Cyberwar - Internet Security News - Systems and Policy Issues
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |