. Military Space News .
SUPERPOWERS
China rising in battle for Central Asia influence

Chinese media hits out at Google, alleges intelligence links
Beijing (AFP) March 20, 2010 - Chinese media unleashed a torrent of criticism against Google on Saturday after reports it would leave the country, with state news agency Xinhua alleging the company was linked to US intelligence. The comments were the latest in a series of angry exchanges sparked by the row over the Internet giant's complaints of cyber hacking and censorship in the country. Xinhua said in an editorial: "Some Chinese Internet users who prefer to use Google still don't realise perhaps that due to the links between Google and the American intelligence services, search histories on Google will be kept and used by the American intelligence agencies."

Google's main spokeswoman in Beijing declined to comment on the claim. The English-language China Daily declared "Google in wrong game" as it took issue with the company's stance, saying: "The Chinese are enjoying unprecedented freedom in the country's more than 5,000 years of history. "If the vested interests' accusation that the Chinese government censors the Internet to spy on its own people does not originate from ignorance, then (it) is a white lie and a malicious attack. "It will not do any good to Google either. And by linking its exit from China with political issues, Google will certainly lose its credibility in a country that has the largest number of netizens," China Daily said.

On its Internet site, China Radio International accused Google of encroaching on the country's sovereignty. "There has only been one such case in over 100 years of colonialism and semi-colonialism: that of the British East India Company, which wanted to control India's sovereignty," the station said. "Perhaps if Google withdraws from the Chinese market it will have negative consequences for certain Internet users but it will be Google that loses the most." On Friday the China Business News quoted an official with an unidentified advertising agency linked to Google as saying the US firm would carry out its threatened withdrawal on April 10. Google declined to comment on the report. The issue has sparked a war of words between China and the administration of President Barack Obama, which has called on Beijing to allow an unfettered Internet.
by Staff Writers
Bishkek (AFP) March 21, 2010
The United States wants to win supremacy to support troops for a prolonged conflict in nearby Afghanistan. Russia sees the region as its own backyard where its right for influence dates back centuries.

But in the modern-day Great Game battle for influence in the strategic region of Central Asia, it is China who is stealing a march on the two Cold War-era superpowers with its vast chequebook, analysts say.

China has been using the twin distractions of the Afghan war and Russia's financial woes to secure its own position in Central Asia, Alexander Cooley, a political scientist at Columbia University, told AFP.

In 2009, for the first time, China's net trade with Central Asia exceeded that of Russia and the trend is likely to persist in the future, he said.

"Russia was traditionally the dominant power in the region, but the financial crisis has undermined its economic power and influence while it has precipitated a wave of new China-Central Asia business deals," he said.

Ex-Soviet Central Asia, a vast resource-rich region bordering Russia, China, Iran and Afghanistan, has long found itself at the centre of power struggles between the world's leading powers.

In the 19th Century, then-Tsarist Russia and the British Empire held an epic century-long struggle for influence here known as The Great Game, their troops and spies facing off along the dusty plains of the legendary Silk Road.

But if the Great Game was defined by two roughly-equal opponents fighting over an established idea -- the Russian Empire's thrust towards British India -- the new contest is more complicated.

The United States is interested in one thing only in Central Asia, said Paul Quinn-Judge, a Bishkek-based analyst with the International Crisis Group. "One word: Afghanistan," he said.

"As a result they are throwing their lot in with some of the most corrupt and authoritarian regimes in the world today, doing incalculable damage to their own long-term standing," he said.

As it prepared to invade Afghanistan in the wake of the September 11, 2001, attacks the United States established military bases in Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan.

Now almost a decade on and with only the Manas Transit Centre in Kyrgyzstan left -- Uzbekistan evicted the US in 2005 over rights criticisms -- the US presence continues to attract negative attention and to anger Moscow.

Rights advocates say that by choosing to keep Manas despite serious human rights and democratic concerns in Kyrgyzstan, Washington has weakened its hand with ordinary people.

Russia's perception that the US military presence in Central Asia is part of a plan to encircle it has become the key factor driving Moscow's ad-hoc policy here, Quinn-Judge said.

"Russia is essentially floundering -- winging a policy here. Its main lever of foreign policy in recent years, money, is in markedly shorter supply these days," he said.

"And the Moscow policy is that of a small part of the leading elite --- notably those around (Russian Prime Minister Vladimir) Putin, as seen from a near obsessive concern about the US in the region."

Into that mix steps China, which has gone on a vast spending spree, lending billions of dollars to local governments and snapping up key energy rights in Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan.

In December a consortium led by the China National Petroleum Company (CNPC) won the rights to develop Turkmenistan's South Yolotan field, one of the world's most prized gas fields.

China is also active in uranium and oil projects in Kazakhstan, the region's largest economy, and has been building modern roads that will transport Chinese goods to impoverished Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan and beyond.

But while China's moves into Central Asia are certainly good business, Beijing has a greater concern, one that is often touted by the region's governments as justification for their often-draconian rule: Islamic extremism.

Three of Central Asia's states -- Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan -- border China's most restive region, Xinjiang, ancestral home to Turkic-speaking Muslim Uighurs, a group Beijing has often portrayed as radical.

China sees a stable, if authoritarian, Central Asia as key towards protecting its western regions from the kind of Islamist violence that has devastated Afghanistan.

"Beijing views the Central Asian states as a critical buffer region for stabilizing and developing its bordering Western province of Xinjiang," Cooley said.



Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


SUPERPOWERS
China's roars grow louder in Year of the Tiger
Beijing (AFP) March 18, 2010
After running at loggerheads with the West over climate change, human rights and nuclear proliferation, China is now on a collision course with the international community on the value of its currency. Emboldened by its growing power and prosperity, China is striking a more defiant pose on the world stage and becoming less inclined to bow to the demands of the West, analysts say. "Clearl ... read more







The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement