. Military Space News .
Dogs of War: Life without Blackwater?

disclaimer: image is for illustration purposes only
by David Isenberg
Washington (UPI) Jul 25, 2008
For a moment there it looked like we might not have Blackwater to kick around anymore.

The company's contract with the U.S. State Department has been at the center of a lot of unflattering media attention since a Baghdad shooting incident last year in which local authorities say innocent civilians and Iraqi police personnel were fired on and killed.

I thought these armed personnel protection details might become an artifact of history when I read the Associated Press story this week reporting that Blackwater Worldwide planned a shift away from the security contracting business and to focus on training, aviation and logistics.

But, as it turns out, I was wrong. Blackwater is not getting out of the security business. Most of the media focused on the news flash that AP sent out and did not carefully read the full story that followed.

Blackwater Worldwide spokeswoman Ann Tyrell said in a telephone interview that company President Gary Jackson was responding to questions about where he saw the future of the private market.

To the surprise of nobody who is even casually familiar with the private military contracting industry, he and company owner Erik Prince told the AP the use of security contractors was a small part of the market and not one that they would seek to focus on.

It has long been a myth, albeit a popular one, that the majority of private military contractors are gun shooters. In fact, the reverse is true, as has been pointed out, largely in vain, by trade groups such as the Professional Services Council and the International Peace Operations Association.

According to estimates from the IPOA, the total value of what it calls the global peace and stability operations industry is about $20 billion for all companies providing services in the field. Of that number, private security contractors make up only about 5 percent to 10 percent, or a maximum of $2 billion annually.

The normal peacetime number would be closer to 5 percent for PSCs, but Iraq has driven it up.

To understand the difference, one has only to follow the money. For example, compare two major contracts in Iraq, the World Wide Personal Protective Services and the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program.

The current WPPS contract, the second, was awarded in July 2005. The State Department utilizes it as an umbrella contract under which it issues task orders to the three contracting companies -- Blackwater USA, DynCorp and Triple Canopy. The bulk of the personnel come from Blackwater. The contract has a ceiling of $1.2 billion per contractor over five years -- one base year and four option years. That works out to $240 million per contractor per year.

LOGCAP, an Army program first established in 1985, is an initiative for the use of civilian contractors in wartime and other contingencies. It includes all pre-planned logistics and engineering/construction-oriented contingency contracts. It does everything from fixing trucks to warehousing ammunition to doing the laundry, running mess halls and building whole bases abroad.

When the Army announced the awarding of the fourth and latest LOGCAP contract back in April to DynCorp International LLC; Fluor Intercontinental Inc.; and Kellogg, Brown and Root Services, the total annual maximum value was $15 billion and the lifetime maximum value was $150 billion. That works out to $5 billion per contractor per year.

You don't need a Ph.D. to figure out which is the market segment with the greatest profit-making opportunities.

You can see similar trends at work in terms of actual numbers of contractors. The Los Angeles Times reported in July 2007 that the number of U.S.-paid private contractors in Iraq exceeded that of American combat troops. More than 180,000 civilians, including Americans, foreigners and Iraqis, were working in Iraq under U.S. contracts. The numbers include at least 21,000 Americans, 43,000 foreign contractors and about 118,000 Iraqis. That number, by the way, would still be bigger than U.S. military forces, even after the United States had increased the number of forces during its 2007 "surge." However, private security contractors were not fully counted in the survey, so the total contractor number was even larger.

By comparison, at the end of December 2007, the U.S. Central Command reported there were approximately 6,467 Defense Department-funded armed PSCs in Iraq. Of that number, 830 were U.S. citizens, 7,590 were third-country nationals, and 1,532 were local/host country nationals. This number, of course, was hardly the total PSC number, as it leaves out those working for the State Department and for the private companies doing reconstruction work. Still, it illustrates the point that the number of American PSCs is a small proportion of the total.

Thus, when Gary Jackson said Blackwater's security business is down to about 30 percent of Blackwater revenue now and it will go much lower, he was just acknowledging the obvious: that security work is a very small share of the overall private military market.

But there is one point worth considering. Blackwater founder and CEO Erik Prince told the AP, "The experience we've had would certainly be a disincentive to any other companies that want to step in and put their entire business at risk."

Time and history will deliver the ultimate verdict on Blackwater. And I would be the last one to argue that everything they have done has been done well, or even right. But it is also true that it has been made into a scapegoat and whipping boy for all those who are uneasy with the concept of outsourcing and privatization.

But the reality is that private contractors are on America's battlefields because the government, elected by the people, wants them there.

It is not difficult to understand why. Given the downsizing the U.S. armed forces underwent since the fall of the Berlin Wall, the military turned to the private sector for help.

If people don't want to use private contractors, the choices are simple: Scale back U.S. commitments or enlarge the military.

(U.S. Navy veteran David Isenberg is a military affairs analyst. He is an adjunct scholar with the Cato Institute, a correspondent for Asia Times and the author of a forthcoming book, "Shadow Force: Private Security Contractors in Iraq." His "Dogs of War" column, analyzing developments in the private security and military sector, appears every Friday.)

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
The Military Industrial Complex at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Probe of irregularities in defense contract audits: Pentagon
Washington (AFP) July 25, 2008
A Pentagon agency that oversees billions of dollars in defense contracts said Friday it has asked for a review of allegations that supervisors sought to pressure auditors to favor major contractors.







  • Ukraine drafts law for Russian fleet to leave: report
  • Russia mulls regular bomber flights to Cuba: report
  • China, Russia finally fix long-disputed border
  • Russia Defense Watch: Flexing arctic power

  • The Indian Nuclear Tango Part Two
  • Iran has up to 6,000 enrichment centrifuges: Ahmadinejad
  • Sandia Sends Sensors Into Space To Detect Nuclear Blasts Globally
  • Missile crew falls asleep with nuclear code device: air force

  • Infrared Terminal Guidance Of AASM Completes Firing Test
  • Raytheon's SLAMRAAM Completes System Field Integration Testing
  • Raytheon Receives Contract For NATO SEASPARROW MK48 Program
  • US Navy Conducts Flight Test Of Tomahawk Block IV Missile

  • Test Boosts Missile Tracking Radars
  • New Cuban nuke crisis threat
  • Boeing And MDA Complete Missile Defense Sensor Integration Test
  • Raytheon Radars Play Key Role In Missile Defense Test

  • China Southern Airlines managers take paycut due to oil prices
  • Air China says it is to buy 45 Boeing aircraft
  • British PM blasts polluting 'ghost' flights
  • Raytheon Leads Team To Evaluate Impact Of New Classes Of Aircraft For NASA

  • Global Hawk Maritime Demo Unmanned Aircraft Supports Firefighters
  • Boeing Acquires Insitu To Expand Capabilities In Unmanned Systems
  • Raytheon's TCS Is First NATO Standard Unmanned Ground Control System
  • NASA Researchers Evaluate Sensor Technology

  • US: Iraq deal may have many dates
  • Britain eyes 'change of mission' in Iraq as troops cut
  • US-Iraq deal won't spell out troop levels: White House
  • Bush, Maliki, agree on 'time horizon' for US troop cut

  • India to train US 'Green Berets' in jungle warfare
  • "Dinosaur eel" points to body armour of the future
  • B-52: Lifespan Of A Raven
  • Russian Navy Aircraft Test New Weapons In Arctic

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement