. Military Space News .
Giving Missile Defense An Extra Boost Part Three

In general, the farther a ballistic missile can reach, the more military options and political prestige it provides to its owner.
by Loren B. Thompson
Arlington, Va. (UPI) Jan 28, 2009
The defining characteristic of ballistic missiles is that they employ a powerful boost from rocket engines to launch them on their trajectories, after which they coast to their intended destinations. Although the trajectory is predictable, it is traversed so quickly that interception is impossible using conventional weapons.

For instance, an intercontinental ballistic missile may move at several miles per second, much faster than any other target that U.S. forces are equipped to counter.

Experts distinguish four categories of ballistic missiles, based on their range:

-- Short-range missiles that can reach as far as 600 kilometers (360 miles).

-- Medium-range missiles that can reach from 600 to 1,300 kilometers (360 to 780 miles).

-- Intermediate-range ballistic missiles that can reach 1,300 to 5,500 kilometers (780 to 3,300 miles).

-- Intercontinental-range ballistic missiles that can reach 5,500 to 10,000 kilometers (3,300 to 6,000 miles).

Weapons with longer ranges typically move faster than those with shorter ones, and therefore are harder to intercept. They also typically have larger payloads, with some carrying 10 or more warheads.

In general, the farther a ballistic missile can reach, the more military options and political prestige it provides to its owner. For example, a short-range missile launched by North Korea cannot hit far beyond the Korean Peninsula, but a medium-range missile can hit most of Japan, an intermediate-range missile can hit Taiwan, and an intercontinental-range missile can hit much of the United States.

The power associated with possessing such options is a key reason why countries like Iran and North Korea expend so much effort pursuing ballistic-missile technology. No other class of weapons confers so much military stature on a nation.

A recent study by the Center for American Progress found the number of medium- and intermediate-range missiles in global arsenals has declined by 80 percent since the closing days of the Cold War and that the number of intercontinental-range missiles has declined by about 70 percent.

These declines demonstrate that when political conditions permit arms reduction, it is feasible to reduce the ballistic-missile threat to the United States and its allies without investing in elaborate defensive schemes. However, the study also found that during the same period some major powers were paring their arsenals, five countries developed new medium-range missiles, and three of those countries -- Iran, North Korea and Pakistan -- were newcomers or aspirants to the nuclear weapons club.

The spread of ballistic-missile technology has followed a classic proliferation pattern.

-- (Part 4: How ballistic missile defenses can prove effective deterrents against the limited ballistic missile arsenals of many nations around the world.)

(Loren B. Thompson is chief executive officer of the Lexington Institute, an Arlington, Va.-based think tank that supports democracy and the free market.)

(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


When Getting MAD Does Not Work Part Two
Arlington, Va. (UPI) Jan 26, 2009
It is not clear whether deterrence based on the threat of retaliation can work in a world of diverse nuclear actors.







  • Clinton calls for 'comprehensive dialogue' with China
  • China to begin projecting military around the world: analysts
  • Chinese premier ready to work with Europe
  • NATO chief hopes for new era in relations with Russia

  • SKorea, Japanese nuclear envoys hold talks
  • Russia drops Kaliningrad missile plans: report
  • Former Employee Pleads Guilty To Leaking Nuclear Secrets
  • Clinton urges Iran to show "willingness to engage" in talks

  • Integrated Fire Control Network Offers Access To Sensor And Any Shooter
  • Lockheed Martin Tests Tactical Missile On British Army Launcher
  • Raytheon To Upgrade Taiwan Patriot Batteries
  • Pakistan should exploit US missile strikes, say analysts

  • Giving Missile Defense An Extra Boost Part Three
  • When Getting MAD Does Not Work Part Two
  • Club Of Nine Gives Missile Defense A Boost Part One
  • Outside View: BMD priorities -- Part 5

  • New Turbines Can Cut Fuel Consumption For Business Jets
  • Air China expects to post 'significant loss' for 2008
  • Nations demand climate plan from air, maritime industries
  • Cathay defers completion of new cargo terminal due to downturn

  • Elbit Systems To Supply Skylark I LE Mini-UAV
  • Analysis: UAVs protect U.S. troops in Iraq
  • Analysis: Intel UAVs are here to stay
  • Boeing Laser Avenger Shoots Down Unmanned Aerial Vehicle In Tests

  • Analysis: Iraq girds for landmark vote
  • Obama to speak "relatively soon" on Iraq withdrawal: Gibbs
  • Iraqi PM says US troops could pull out before deadline
  • Four US soldiers killed in Iraq helicopter crash

  • Raytheon Chosen To Help Provide US DoD Biometrics Ops And Support Services
  • Analysis: CENTCOM's software revolution
  • Game Provides Clue To Improving Remote Sensing
  • Northrop Grumman Announces First Sale Of NAVEX Air Navigation System

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement