. Military Space News .
MILPLEX
Iran out, but Russia eyes Turkey for S-300

U.S. tanker plane tender delayed
Washington (UPI) Jun 21, 2010 - The U.S. Department of Defense says it will hold out on awarding a controversial $35 billion air tanker contract for as much as two months, until November. U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. Mark Shackelford told a recent Pentagon briefing that planning figures "anticipate an award in the mid-November time frame. The $35 billion contract concerns the supply of 179 tanker planes to the U.S. Air Force. Northrop Grumman Corp and European aerospace giant EADS, the parent company of Airbus, had beat Boeing in a similar race two years ago. But their winning bid was annulled after government auditors found that the Air Force has skewed its judgment rules.

The annulment sparked a diplomatic fracas with senior European officials berating the United States for what they billed as an act of protectionism. Since then EADS was allowed to return to the bidding process, affording it 60 days to revise its bid. At the time, the Pentagon and the Air Force insisted that the change would not delay the awarding of the $35 billion contract. In fact, Defense News reported, officials in March said the Department of Defense would accelerate the evaluation of the bids to "stick to the original contract award schedule of early fall 2010." A month later the Pentagon crossed out the term "contract award date" set for July 16, replacing it with "contract start date" scheduled for Nov. 12. The move sparked fresh debate with officials insisting that the awarding date hadn't been changed.

The Pentagon's latest announcement has sparked furious remarks from Boeing advocates alleging foul play. "It's now clear that the Pentagon is playing games," U.S. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., was quoted saying by the Seattlepi Web site. The original deadline for EADS and rival Boeing to submit their bids was May 10. They are now due July 9. The EADS plane tanker A330 MRTT can load and carry more refueling supplies and travel over a greater distance than its Boeing 776-based rival. What's more, a review by the U.S. Air Force in 2008 stated clear preference for the EADS model.

The Airbus model has been chosen over Boeing 767 derivatives as a tanker by Australia, Britain, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia in the four most recent contests, EADS has said in company statements. EADS, however, has complained that the bid has been tailored to suit Boeing. In a recent setback for the European aerospace company, the World Trade Organization ruled that Airbus had received illegal "launch aid" for other aircraft projects. Several members of the U.S. Congress have since then lobbied against EADS, trying to penalize the company for what they allege to be an illegal advantage in the bidding war.
by Staff Writers
Moscow (UPI) Jun 21, 2010
Russia's arms export chief says Moscow hopes to sell Turkey the powerful S-300 air-defense missile system -- and possibly the more advanced S-400 -- after blocking delivery of the weapon to Iran.

"The Turkish army has a great need to acquire S-300 and S-400 systems, Anatoly Isaikin, director of the state-owned arms exporter Rosoboronexport, told the RIA Novosti agency.

Speaking at a defense exhibition in Paris, he disclosed that Russia was prepared to participate in a Turkish tender for missile systems along with Western arms manufacturers.

Last week, Moscow announced it was blocking the delivery of five batteries of S-300PMU systems sold to Tehran in a controversial $800 million contract in 2007. The Russians cited the fourth round of economic sanctions imposed on Iran by the U.N. Security Council June 9 over Tehran's refusal to scrap its alleged nuclear arms program.

Iran was incensed, even though the Russians had been delaying deliveries for months, apparently under pressure from the United States.

The Iranians want the missiles to defend their nuclear installations against a threatened pre-emptive strike by Israel.

If Russia does sell the S-300s to Turkey, it would mark a significant shift in Ankara's geopolitical orientation that would dismay the Americans.

During the Cold War the United States relied on Turkey, the only Muslim member of NATO, to be a bulwark against Soviet expansionism.

But under the Islamist government of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, which came to power in 2003, Turkey's priorities have shifted eastward to Iran, Central Asia and Russia.

U.S. concerns have deepened as Turkey's strategic alliance with Israel, the only other non-Arab power in the region, is crumbling following the killing of nine Turks aboard a Turkish-flagged ship seeking to break Israel's blockade of the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip on May 31.

The concern in Washington now, as Turkey moves ever farther away from its old allies in the West, is the possibility that if the Russians do sell S-300s to Turkey they could end up in Iran.

Russia's acquiescence on withholding the S-300 from Iran flies in the face of Moscow's drive to boost its arms industry, a key earner of foreign currency.

Moscow is using arms sales to bolster its efforts to restore the influence in the Middle East it enjoyed during the Cold War. Arms deliveries then were a key component in Soviet alliances with, at various times, Egypt, Syria, Algeria, Libya and Yemen.

The Strategy Page, an Internet site that specializes in defense issues, noted after Moscow announced it wouldn't deliver the S-300 to Iran: "A less discussed reason for not delivering the S-300s is Israeli claims that they have technology that can neutralize the S-300 radar and missile guidance electronics.

"That may or may not be true but the Russians are not eager to see yet another of their weapons defeated by Israeli countermeasures."

Turkey, a member of NATO, has traditionally bought its weapons systems and military equipment from the West, primarily the United States.

So acquiring Russian S-300s would mark a major departure that could open the door to further Russian systems for a military equipped largely with U.S. products.

Mixing weapons systems like that is expensive since it involves a whole new logistics and training program alongside the existing one and the different systems aren't always compatible.

Egypt, which acquired its arms from the Soviets until the early 1970s then switched to U.S. weaponry after making peace with Israel in 1978, is still stuck with much outdated Soviet-era equipment as it absorbs far more sophisticated U.S. systems.

Ultimately, if Turkey does acquire S-300s and seeks to pass them on to neighboring Iran in its drive to gain influence among its Muslim neighbors, it would be crossing a line in terms of its relationship with the United States.

Erdogan may not wish to take such a bold step. But Turkey's increasing assertiveness in its quest to restore its position as a paramount power in the region is fast gathering momentum.



Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
The Military Industrial Complex at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


MILPLEX
Turkey 'freezes arms deals with Israel'
Tel Aviv, Israel (UPI) Jun 18, 2010
Turkey is reported to have frozen at least 16 arms deals with Israel worth an estimated $56 billion, including missile projects and upgrading combat aircraft and tanks, in a major escalation of its confrontation with the Jewish state. The Turkish newspaper Today's Zaman reported Friday that the contracts were suspended after the Israeli government refused to apologize for the May 31 kil ... read more







The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement