Subscribe free to our newsletters via your
. Military Space News .




FLOATING STEEL
Nuclear-powered cruisers' upgrade: when economy is pointless
by Ilya Kramnik
Moscow (Voice of Russia) Sep 07, 2012


Admiral Nakhimov cruiser.

20125 billion roubles have been allocated for the modernization of the Admiral Nakhimov cruiser. What capabilities will the updated ship acquire and are these expenses going to be justified in response to the shortage of new generation fighting ships? Talks about modernization of Admiral Nakhimov and other battlecruisers of Project 1144, withdrawn from the combat-ready forces of the fleet in the 90s, have been circulating for a very long time, but due to a lack of funds they had virtually no real implementation.

In the second half of the 2000s, the government started financing the armed forces, and this spurred discussions concerning the retired cruisers' return to the ranks. Naturally, the question of their role in the overall structure of the Navy immediately arose.

Almost all experts have agreed on one point: the return of the Project 1144 vessels to the Navy would be practical only if their total modernization would make them multipurpose.

By this time the Russian industry has already acquired possibilities for such a modernization: universal shipborne shooting complexes were created that significantly increased the range of weapons adopted by a ship depending on a specific task. Combat information and new generation control systems allowed the construction of a large unit's collective defense system, that is, to exchange information in real time and control the firepower of several ships from one command post.

Moreover, the Project 1144 cruisers upgraded with new shooting complexes and electronic equipment will acquire a totally new attribute as their dimensions allow these ships to be equipped with a large number of weapons, turning them into truly multifunctional vessels possessing powerful and diverse percussion armaments, air defense systems and anti-submarine defense.

Modernization with the use of all the above-mentioned technical innovations costs a lot. According to various estimates, the price of such large-scale works may total more than 40 billion rubles ($1.3 billion) per ship. Meanwhile, only 5 billion roubles have been allotted for Admiral Nakhimov's modernization. What can be done with this sum?

Re-equipping the entire ship is out of the question because the amount of work and the cost of new units such an option unrealistic. According to preliminary estimates, 5 billion roubles should be enough to restore the ship's combat capability to its "original" form and improve its on-board radio-electronic equipment.

It is also not guaranteed that these funds will be enough to replace close combat air-defense systems. At the same time, the basis of the heavy cruiser's firepower - the Granit missile complex and ?-300F surface-to-air missile system - will most likely remain intact.

Nakhimov will be the first ship of Project 1144 to undergo modernization. Most likely, it will be followed by Pyotr Veliky, which will soon celebrate 20 years of operation. But the destiny of the first two cruisers - Kirov and Admiral Lazarev - is not decided yet. Apparently, their overhaul was considered too expensive to suit the "cheap" modernization.

The "cheap" modernization has one advantage. Admiral Nakhimov's shipborne systems may be returned to the ranks rather quickly, within two-three years, as they have not been fully exhausted. However, this will not solve the problem in general. Admiral Nakhimov, as well as its younger sister-ship Pyotr Veliky, will remain as "specialized" ships, designed, first of all, for battling an enemy fleet. A "costly" modernization can turn the cruiser into a universal one, but it will take much more time - up to five or more years.

At the same time, it is hardly worth being in a hurry in this case. The Navy will receive a ship, though very powerful, but not meeting present-day requirements and unsuitable for solving practical problems the Russian Navy is currently facing.

According to this scenario, the sad fate of the American Iowa battleships can overtake the upgraded cruisers. These battleships were modernized in the 80s, but very soon after, they were transferred to the reserve in the first half of the 90s. However, if need be, their systems and mechanisms will allow them to continue to be used today.

Limited modernization has not given the Second World War battleships the opportunities that were necessary for successful competition with the latest cruisers and destroyers equipped with the Aegis Combat System. It would be a pity if Russian cruiserssuffer the same fate.

.


Related Links
Nuclear Naval Warfare at Spacewar.com
Naval Warfare in the 21st Century






Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle








FLOATING STEEL
Taiwan to build six minehunters
Taipei (AFP) Sept 3, 2012
Taiwan plans to spend $1.2 billion on building six minehunters as part of efforts to negate China's ability to blockade the island in a future conflict, a legislator said Monday. The minehunters will be built between 2013 and 2025, according to Lin Yu-fang, a legislator of the ruling Kuomintang party who sits on parliament's defence committee. He was citing the defence ministry's draft 2013 ... read more


FLOATING STEEL
Israel's Arrow 3 missile to be tested soon

PAC-3 Missile Intercepts Tactical Ballistic Missile Target During Test

US looks at new early-warning radar for Japan: officials

Lockheed Martin Receives Contract To Produce THAAD Weapon System Equipment For The US Army

FLOATING STEEL
Raytheon successfully tests HARM upgrades

Raytheon receives $230 million contract for SM-3

Russia to create new ICBM by 2018

Boeing Winged JDAM Completes First Round of Tests

FLOATING STEEL
AeroVironment Receives $16.5 Million of Funding from U.S. Army for RQ-11B Raven

Northrop Grumman Highlights International Capabilities in Unmanned Aircraft Systems at ILA Berlin Air Show 2012

Apple shoots down drone strike tracking iPhone app

Drones, UAV: what is better?

FLOATING STEEL
Intelsat General Awarded Contract in US Government's New Custom SATCOM Solutions Program

Smartphone App Can Track Objects On the Battlefield as Well as On the Sports Field

Lockheed Martin Wins Role on Defense Information Systems Agency Program

Raytheon unveils cross domain strategy to securely access information via mobile devices

FLOATING STEEL
USAF Awards Lockheed Martin Sniper ATP Sustainment Contract

Aura Systems boosts South Korean orders

Thales Australia creates munitions group

Powerful new explosive could replace today's state-of-the-art military explosive

FLOATING STEEL
Rheinmetall expands; GKN set to do so

Outside View: How much is enough?

Cash-strapped Slovenia slashes defence order

Thales in Australian, Indian ventures

FLOATING STEEL
Japan closes in on deal to buy Senkakus

Birdman Putin flies with rare cranes over Siberia

Clinton in Brunei on mission to calm sea row

Tensions set to cloud APEC summit

FLOATING STEEL
Researchers Develop New, Less Expensive Nanolithography Technique

Breakthrough in nanotechnology material science

Nano machine shop shapes nanowires, ultrathin films

New wave of technologies possible after ground-breaking analysis tool developed




The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement