. | . |
Obama revamps Bush-era missile shield
Washington (AFP) Sept 17, 2009 In a major shift based on a reassessment of the threat from Iran, US President Barack Obama Thursday shelved plans for a missile shield in Eastern Europe, the cause of a Cold War-style row with Russia. Obama decided to replace the shield, the brainchild of former US president George W. Bush, with a more mobile system targeting Iranian short-range and medium-range missiles, initially using sea-based interceptors. "Our new missile defense architecture in Europe will provide stronger, smarter, and swifter defenses of American forces and America's allies," Obama said at the White House. The decision however risked alienating US allies in the former Soviet bloc and infuriated Obama's Republican foes, who accused him of appeasing Moscow and of showing dangerous weakness. Sensitive to claims he is weak on national security and was sending the wrong kind of signal towards Iran, the president insisted the new plan made American allies more secure. "This new approach will provide capabilities sooner, build on proven systems and offer greater defenses against the threat of missile attack than the 2007 European missile defense program," he said. The dramatic move followed a shift in intelligence assessments of Iran's ballistic program, which concluded the most immediate threat was Tehran's short- and medium-range arsenal, not yet-to-be-developed long-range missiles. "Our clear and consistent focus has been the threat posed by Iran's ballistic missile program and that continues to be our focus and basis of the program that we're announcing today," Obama said. The Bush-era system would have involved building a radar system in the Czech Republic and basing missiles in Poland -- a scenario which infuriated Russia and became an impediment to better US-Russia relations. Critics argued the system could not be proven to work, was focused on a non-existent threat from Iranian long-range hardware and needlessly angered Russia. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said under the reconfigured system, more mobile SM-3 interceptor missiles would initially be deployed on ships, while the military developed a land-based system. "The second phase, about 2015, will involve fielding upgraded land-based SM-3s," he said. Consultations have begun with allies, starting with Poland and the Czech Republic, about hosting the land-based version, he said. The White House denied the decision was part of a quid pro quo to entice greater Russian cooperation on issues like Iran's nuclear program and Afghanistan. "Absolutely not," said Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs, insisting the president had been motivated by military and strategic imperatives and not by Russia's charges that the proposed Eastern European shield threatened its security. "This is not about Russia," he said. Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, due to see Obama at the UN General Assembly and the G20 summit in Pittsburgh next week, hailed the decision, saying it could boost anti-missile cooperation between Moscow and Washington. "I am ready to continue dialogue," he said, adding that "Washington's declaration today shows that there are good conditions" on the ground for joint anti-missile action. Konstantin Kosachev, head of the Russian lower house of parliament's foreign affairs committee. said "Russia has been waiting for this for a long time." "The Obama administration is starting to understand us," he said, while Moscow also denied the US decision was part of a secret US deal with Russia. Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer said he learned of the plan during a late-night call from Obama. "The Czech Republic has acknowledged this decision," he said. But Mirek Topolanek, who was prime minister when Prague agreed to co-host the shield, said Obama's move was "not good news for the Czech state, for Czech freedom and independence." In Poland, former president and Nobel laureate Lech Walesa said it might be time rethink close ties with the United States. There was also fury among Republicans, who tried to use the decision to brand Obama weak on national security. The number two Senate Republican Jon Kyl, called the move "dangerous and short-sighted," and said it left the United States vulnerable to a growing threat from Iranian long-range missiles. Obama's defeated Republican election foe John McCain complained that the decision was "seriously misguided."
earlier related report "The intelligence community now assesses that the threat from Iran's short- and medium-range ballistic missiles is developing more rapidly than previously projected, while the threat of potential Iranian intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capabilities has been slower to develop than previously estimated," the White House said in a statement. Iran's medium-range missiles could hit Turkey and some other NATO members as well as Israel and most Arab states, experts say. ICBMs, which Tehran has yet to obtain or test, have a longer range of more than 5,000 kilometers (3,106 miles) that could threaten the United States. The "new architecture" for missile defense, which the White House said was based on technology that was "proven" and "cost-effective," would replace plans to install a radar in the Czech Republic and 10 interceptors in Poland. Instead of the ground-based interceptors initially planned for Poland, the administration will rely on the Standard Missile-3 (SM-3), a sea-based interceptor that was used to successfully shoot down a failed US spy satellite in February 2008. The SM-3 would be modified over time to operate from land as well, officials said. The program would have three stages: Phase One: First elements of the shield would be deployed in 2011, including the sea-based Aegis system, the SM-3, and a network of sensors that would allow the tracking and targeting of missiles threatening Europe and US forces. Phase Two: In 2015, an improved version of the SM-3 (Block IB) that could operate on land and at sea would be deployed to expand the area under protection against the threat of short- and medium-range missiles. More advanced sensors would also be introduced. US officials said the planned land-based version of the SM-3 and other parts of the system might be deployed in the Czech Republic or Poland depending on the outcome of talks with those countries. Phase Three: In 2018, a more advanced SM-3 (Block IIA) that could counter intermediate range missiles would be deployed. Phase Four: In 2020, an upgraded SM-3 (Block IIB), designed to take on the potential threat of an ICBM aimed at the United States, would be deployed after testing and development. Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com All about missiles at SpaceWar.com Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
Japan missile-interception test successful: govt Tokyo (AFP) Sept 17, 2009 Japan said it successfully shot down a mock ballistic missile late Wednesday in its second test of a US-developed surface-to-air interception system, the defence ministry said. The Japan Air Self-Defence Force "successfully intercepted a mock ballistic missile at Japan time 11:46 pm on September 16 in a test conducted in New Mexico," said a defence ministry spokeswoman. In September last ... read more |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2009 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |