. Military Space News .
Obama's new missile defense plan

Ukraine in talks to host part of US missile shield: report
Ukraine is in talks with Washington to host part of a US missile shield, Kiev's US envoy was quoted as saying Thursday, sparking concern from Russia, which has fiercely opposed similar plans. "This question is part of working discussion, but so far it is in a rather initial phase," Oleh Shamshur, the Ukrainian ambassador to the United States, was quoted by Interfax as saying in Kiev. "We are talking about whether to use radars that are on Ukrainian territory and that Russia declined using," he said, adding that such a plan had the backing of Ukraine's leaders. The Pentagon issued a statement last week insisting no proposal had been made to station elements of the missile shield in Ukraine in an bid to sooth Russian concerns over reports that Kiev had voiced interest in such a plan. Moscow welcomed a decision by President Barack Obama last month to shelve a proposal by the previous US administration to deploy anti-missile weaponry and a radar in Poland and the Czech Republic. But the US State Department has since suggested that third countries including Ukraine could contribute to an early warning system under a new plan for sea-based interceptors to protect against possible missile threats from Iran. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov voiced concern Thursday over the United States cooperating with Ukraine on missile defence. "We are closely monitoring the news that is generated as a result of these talks," Ryabkov told news agency ITAR TASS. "To say we feel concern over the reports we have heard would be to put it mildly." Moscow has been irked in recent years by US military ties with its former Soviet neighbors in Eastern Europe, an area it views as part of its historic sphere of influence.

Israel's Barak hails US missile shield rethink
Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak on Wednesday hailed a US move to create a sea-borne anti-missile shield to ward off Iranian threats in place of a planned system in eastern Europe that angered Russia. "We've listened very carefully to the American argumentation about the change in policy," Barak told reporters during a visit to Poland, where Washington had planned to base a battery of missile interceptors. "The new approach really provides more flexibility and, in a relatively short time, a much more effective, economical way to deal effectively with the challenge of missiles from Iran," he said. Last month, the administration of US President Barack Obama said it was scrapping its plan to deploy the interceptors in Poland by 2013 as well as an associated radar in the neighbouring Czech Republic. The previous administration of George W. Bush had insisted the plan was meant to parry threats from Iran, but Russia was enraged by what it dubbed as a threatening US move on its doorstep. Obama's decision came amid thawing ties with Moscow. Washington's new scheme foresees a mobile, sea-based system designed to protect against short- and medium-range missiles. Moscow has welcomed the US move to scrap the Polish and Czech sites but it has not been entirely happy with the new system, which Washington says could also include land-based components in Europe from 2015. Barak said it was crucial to forge ahead with the plans, as Iran's military programme moves forward step-by-step - Tehran recently test-fired missiles which it said could reach targets inside Israel. "Their missiles can now cover Israel and the margins of Europe, and in a few years they will be able to cover Europe as well. Basically Iran is perceived by Israel to be a major threat to world stability," he said. (AFP Reports)
by Staff Writers
Warsaw, Poland (UPI) Oct 15, 2009
Experts are optimistic that U.S. President Barack Obama's new missile defense plan for Eastern Europe is better than the old one.

Obama's new plan, the so-called "phased, adaptive approach" for a European missile defense system features a combination of fixed (ground-based) and relocatable (on U.S. warships) Standard Missile 3 interceptors and radars that focuses mainly on the threat from short- and medium-range missiles.

The system pushed by Obama's predecessor, President George W. Bush, had banked on 10 long-range interceptor missiles stationed in Poland and a radar unit in the Czech Republic.

Obama last month decided to drop that plan, citing new intelligence indicating that the biggest security threat right now comes from Iranian short- and medium-range missiles instead of long-range ones, which Iran seems to have a hard time developing.

The new approach "will provide capability sooner, build on proven systems and offer greater defenses against the threat of missile attack than the 2007 European missile defense program," Obama said. Additionally, the plan foresees more advanced missiles and radars to be stationed in Europe once Iran has developed longer-range missiles.

The centerpiece of the new system is the 21-foot SM-3 missile built by defense contracting giant Raytheon. The Navy has been using and testing the missile, which costs an estimated $10 million to $15 million, relatively successfully. (The U.S. Navy fired an SM-3 from a Navy vessel in February 2008 to shoot down a failing U.S. spy satellite in space.)

Launched from a large Navy vessel, an SM-3 missile would try to hit and destroy an Iranian rocket outside the earth's atmosphere. Critics say, however, say that the SM-3 remains vulnerable to decoys such as balloons and flares.

But while technical uncertainties dominate any new missile defense system, other experts laud the new plan's inclusive approach.

"Fortunately, the 'phased, adaptive approach' emphasizes an important element to the European missile defense architecture that the Bush-era plans lacked -- the role of European allies in the framework of missile defense plans," writes Jerry Shin for the Center for Defense Information. "The administration's European missile defense policy aims to engage allies and NATO members more closely by integrating multilateralism in place of the individual bilateral agreements between the United States and Poland and the Czech Republic respectively."

It also leaves room for including Russia in the system; Moscow from the start had opposed Bush's missile defense system and has since reacted cautiously optimistic that it might even accept the new plan.

earlier related report
Clinton touts joint US-Russian missile shield
Moscow (AFP) Oct 14 - A joint US-Russian missile shield protecting the two former Cold War foes against nuclear-armed extremists would be "very positive," US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Wednesday.

"It would be in my view a very positive outcome if some day in the future you see the United States and Russia announcing a joint plan on missile defence," she told an audience of students at Moscow State University.

Clinton stressed that the United States and Russia shared fundamental values and needed such a joint system to defend themselves against the threat of attacks by extremist groups.

"The biggest immediate threat the world faces are nuclear weapons under the control of groups of people... who believe that martyrdom or suicide attacks are a positive way to end one's life," Clinton said.

"That is not Russia and that is not the United States," she added.

Clinton did not specify who she meant, but Washington has said its missile defence plans are designed to protect against Iran, whose fiercely anti-US government supports the radical Islamic groups Hamas and Hezbollah.

Russia has been deeply sceptical of the US plans, however, and it strongly opposed a plan backed by former US president George W. Bush to deploy missile defence facilities in Poland and the Czech Republic.

The Obama administration last month scrapped the eastern Europe plans and replaced them with a new scheme for a mobile, sea-based system designed to protect against short- and medium-range missiles.

Moscow welcomed the US move to scrap the Polish and Czech sites but it has not been entirely happy with the new system, which Washington says could also include land-based components in Europe from 2015.

"We currently have a whole array of questions about what has been decided on implementing the new scheme for creating a missile defence system," Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said on Wednesday.

Ryabkov's comments came after he met on Monday with a senior US official, Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Securty Ellen Tauscher, to discuss the new US missile plan.

"The Americans gave us fairly in-depth, detailed explanations on these questions and we will study them," Ryabkov said, quoted by Russian news agencies.

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


US, Russia should work closely on missile defence: Clinton
Moscow (AFP) Oct 13, 2009
Russia and the United States should work more closely on missile defence, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Tuesday, after Washington's shelving of a missile shield plan ended a major dispute with Moscow. "We would like to see Russia and the United States collaborate closely on missile defence," Clinton told reporters after talks with her Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov. ... read more







The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2009 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement