. Military Space News .
Russia Will Be Able To Evade US ABM System
The new Russian systems, primarily those designed to combat theater-level ballistic missiles, will incorporate the best elements of the S-300 (pictured) family of low- to high-altitude surface-to-air missile systems, and of the S-400 Triumph systems that are to be put on combat duty in 2007.
The new Russian systems, primarily those designed to combat theater-level ballistic missiles, will incorporate the best elements of the S-300 (pictured) family of low- to high-altitude surface-to-air missile systems, and of the S-400 Triumph systems that are to be put on combat duty in 2007.
by Andrei Kislyakov
RIA Novosti political commentator
Moscow, Russia (RIA Novosti) Mar 19, 2007
The Russian leaders have apparently formulated their so-called asymmetrical reply to the comprehensive American anti-ballistic missile (ABM) program. Russia's measures will also be comprehensive, and they appear to be quite well structured. The United States is working to deploy a global ABM system that would be effective against intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and intermediate-range missiles with a range of up to 5,000 km (3,107 miles).

Leaving aside arguments concerning which possible adversary might launch such missiles against U.S. territory, I must still say that Russia has a good reason to be alarmed by Washington's plans to deploy its ABM systems and early-warning radars in Europe.

There are two aspects to this problem.

First, Russia will take asymmetrical measures. Just like the Soviet Union did during the Strategic Defense Initiative (commonly called Star Wars) period, Russia will focus on strengthening and improving its offensive nuclear missile capability.

This is a logical choice, considering two factors.

For one, offensive weapons will have the upper hand over defensive systems for a long time yet. Therefore, the current standards of military technology will prevent ABM systems from intercepting the required majority of incoming ICBM warheads equipped with evasion systems.

And then, the improvement of offensive arms with a view to evading ABM defenses will remain, in the foreseeable future, the cheapest reply to the deployment of such defenses, whose creation will cost Washington some $60 billion by 2015. Although Russia's defense budget is several times smaller than the American one, it can nevertheless maintain superiority in terms of cost-effectiveness and feasibility.

Second, recent events have shown that a potential large-scale military conflict would most likely involve intermediate missiles supported by aircraft. This means that now is the time to consider designing aerospace theater-defense systems.

Such comprehensive fifth-generation aerospace systems, incorporating anti-air and anti-space defense elements, can be created at Russia's Almaz-Antey corporation. First Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov, a possible presidential candidate and former defense minister, announced the news at a meeting of Russia's Defense Industry Commission in late February.

The new systems, primarily those designed to combat theater-level ballistic missiles, will incorporate the best elements of the S-300 (NATO reporting name SA-10 Grumble) family of low- to high-altitude surface-to-air missile systems, and of the S-400 Triumph systems that are to be put on combat duty in 2007.

General of the Army Vladimir Mikhailov, commander-in-chief of the Russian Air Force, said at a meeting with foreign air force attaches on March 13: "We are working on a new air defense system that will be considerably better than the S-400. We have laid the groundwork to move from theory to practice."

If the Russian concept of replying to the U.S. ABM challenge is implemented in accordance with the state armaments program, Moscow will have the requisite offensive and defensive capability to repel a potential aerospace attack by 2015.

The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.

Source: RIA Novosti

Related Links
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
SpaceDaily
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express







  • Germany Fears US Anti-Missile Shield Could Fuel 'New Arms Race'
  • Growing US Military Concerns For China
  • India Developing News Alliances
  • EU Bickers Over Birthday Card Message

  • Iran Develops New Air Defence System
  • US Upbeat On Korea As North Says Nuke Plant Shutdown Soon
  • Japan Says Solid Security Needed To Counter North Korean Threat
  • South Korea Sceptical On Nuclear Deal

  • Raytheon To Enhance Patriot Global Capabilities Under Pure Fleet Contract
  • Excalibur Completes Final Testing Clearing Path For Early Fielding
  • LockMart Unveils New Four-Mode Guidance Ground Launched Precision Strike Missile
  • New Hellfire-Compatible Guided Rocket Can Defeat Targets In Urban Operations

  • US Missile Scheme Hurts Ties With Russia
  • Russia Will Be Able To Evade US ABM System
  • US Missile Chief Briefs Ukraine On Shield Plans
  • US Missile Defenses Performed Well In North Korea Crisis Claims Boeing

  • Germans Urged To Give Foreign Travel A Rest To Curb Global Warming
  • Raytheon Team Proposes Single International Standard In ADS-B Pursuit
  • NASA Signs Defense Department Agreement
  • Lockheed Martin And FAA Reach Significant Milestone In Transformation Of Flight Services

  • Northrop Grumman Gets 287 Million Dollar Global Hawk Unmanned Aerial Systems Contract
  • Boeing Prepares First US Military ScanEagle Crews
  • Israeli Air Force Unveils Long-Range Drone
  • New Technology Expands Air Force Combat Capability

  • US Rogue State U-Turn
  • Iraq Surge Successes And Setbacks
  • Does The Surge Needs Sadr
  • Washington Dodgers

  • Key Phase Of New B-2 Bomber Communication System To Begin
  • Raytheon Mid-Range Munition Projectile Scores Direct Hit Against T-72 Tank
  • Future Combat System Faces Tough Times
  • South Korea Unveils Underwater Tank

  • The contents herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2005 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy statement