. Military Space News .
Tank And Rocket Chaos Besets Russia Part Two

disclaimer: image is for illustration purposes only
by Andrei Kislyakov
Moscow (UPI) Jan 18, 2008
The Bulava submarine-launched ballistic missile's record does not in any way match the standards of previous Russian missile tests.

The Russian navy already has a fine liquid-fuel SLBM in the RSM-54, and its latest version, the Sineva R-29RMU -- NATO designation Skiff SSN-23 -- once more successfully tested on Dec. 25, 2007. The RSM-54 carries four, and the Sineva -- with a service life of several decades -- 10 multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles, or MIRVs with a yield of 100Kt each.

The RSM-54 can also be mounted with a HEF warhead of about two tons of conventional explosives for use in a non-nuclear conflict, or with a low-yield nuclear warhead -- equivalent to up to 50 tons of TNT -- for pinpoint hits.

Why the Russian navy needs an under-tested intercontinental ballistic missile is not clear. It must finally be acknowledged that sea-based solid-fuel missiles are not Russia's strong point. True, Akula-type submarines were once armed with solid-fuel RSM-52s. However, their Bark modernization program was discontinued following several abortive launches.

If the thinking behind the new sea missile is confused, the motives for developing yet another combat tank are equally murky and require a lot of research to understand.

For the record, Russia has five combat, or main battle tanks in service: the T-62 and the T-64, which are no longer produced, the T-72, which has spawned further versions, and its modifications the T-80 and T-90, which have the status of new tanks.

For all that, only a handful of battalions in Russia are equipped with tanks of the last type, and both the T-80 and the T-90 have much room for improvement, especially in their propulsion machinery -- the weakest spot of Russian tanks.

So, even without a new tank project, arms companies such as Uralvagonzavod should have their hands full -- in the first place with some solid research into turbo-diesels, which showed such fine performance in the mid-1980s and replaced the fuel-guzzling and fickle gas turbine engines on T-80s.

Incidentally, it is its robust diesel engine that has won enviable export fame for the T-90, a tank not yet well tried in the Russian armed forces themselves. In 2001 Russia and India signed a contract for the delivery of 310 T-90 tanks, and early in December 2007 India was reported to have ordered another 347.

As such, thought cannot be stopped, but the designer's ideas stemming from a pool of technological data are one thing, and fondly nostalgic reports of success are quite another.

(Andrei Kislyakov is a political commentator for RIA Novosti. This article is reprinted by permission of RIA Novosti. The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.)

(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
The Military Industrial Complex at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Indian T-90 Deal Offers Lessons For America And Europe
Washington (UPI) Jan 18, 2008
India's decision to purchase 347 T-90 Main Battle Tanks from Russia flies in the face of the strategic assumptions confidently -- and complacently -- held by both the European Union and the United States.







  • US concerned over China military build-up, Taiwan: admiral
  • Taiwan condemns China's 'chequebook diplomacy' over Malawi ties
  • India and China pledge new era of cooperation
  • Commentary: Bipartisan manifesto

  • Outside View: Bush vs. Ahmadinejad
  • Split Emerges Over North Korean Nuclear Ambitions As Patience Wears Thin
  • Russia has right to 'preventative' nuclear strike: general
  • Iran slams US sanctions drive, China backs dialogue

  • NATO Could Use US Missiles For South East Theater Defense
  • Analysis: Capabilities of Chinese missiles
  • Israel test-fires ballistic missile after Iran warning
  • MEADS Receives Contract To Incorporate New PAC-3 Missile Segment Enhancement

  • Seoul to equip ships to intercept NKorea missiles: report
  • Poland wants US security response in missile shield talks
  • Czech officials urge business deals in missile shield project
  • Analysis: U.S. rockets face Polish hurdles

  • Qatar Airways looking to natural gas fuel
  • EADS offers to build military, civilian aircraft in US
  • Purdue Wind Tunnel Key For Hypersonic Vehicles And Future Space Planes
  • Antarctic ballooning hits milestone

  • BAE Systems Delivers UAV Target Detection Systems To US Army
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Show Battlefield To Soldiers
  • GA-ASI And SENER Sign Teaming Agreement On Predator UAS Series
  • EDA Awards Contract For UAV Air Traffic Insertion Road Map

  • US military chiefs weigh Iraq deployments' strain on force
  • US troop draw-down depends on Iraqi forces: defense chief
  • Feature: U.S. helps rebuild Iraq hope
  • US warplanes rain bombs on Al-Qaeda in Iraq: military

  • Analysis: India rejects ban on landmines
  • First Tranche 2 Eurofighter Typhoon Has Flown
  • Boeing And SAIC Announce Accelerated Testing Of FCS Early Prototype Systems
  • US Navy Selects Northrop Grumman For Counter Radio-Controlled IED Electronic Warfare Systems

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement