. Military Space News .
NUKEWARS
Trump urged Kim to go 'all in' on nuclear poker: official
by Staff Writers
Hanoi (AFP) March 1, 2019

Yongbyon: North Korean nuclear complex and one of the sticking points in Hanoi
- What is it? -

About 100 kilometres (60 miles) north of Pyongyang, Yongbyon is made up of dozens of buildings related to North Korea's nuclear weapons programme.

In the aftermath of the summit, a State Department official described it as: "A sprawling three square-mile site, with more than 300 different separate facilities located on it, all of which are dedicated to supporting the nuclear weapons programme in North Korea."

Opened in 1986, it is home to the country's first nuclear reactor, with a five megawatt capacity, and is the only known source of plutonium for the North's weapons programme.

It also produces other key fuels for nuclear bombs -- highly enriched uranium and tritium -- and according to a 2019 report by the Stanford Center for International Security and Cooperation has been expanding even amid the recent diplomatic thaw.

- How important is it? -

Yongbyon is not believed to be the North's only uranium enrichment facility and closing it down would not in and of itself signal an end to the country's atomic programme.

US intelligence believes Pyongyang has at least two more uranium plants -- one near Kangson, just outside Pyongyang, and another at an undisclosed location.

A Yongbyon closure "may *slow* the growth of North Korea's fissile material stockpile, but it would not *cap* it", tweeted Jeffrey Lewis, a researcher at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey.

Critics also note that North Korea has already produced a stockpile of fissile material with which to build more bombs.

"It is important to be precise about what a shut-down accomplishes and what it does not," Lewis added.

Given the size of the complex, the State Department official said it was important to be "very precise" about what the North Koreans were offering to dismantle.

"The North Koreans struggled to give us a precise definition of what that was," said the official.

- What does the North want in exchange? -

When South Korean President Moon Jae-in went to Pyongyang for a summit with Kim in September, the North offered Yongbyon's "permanent destruction", but only if the US took "corresponding actions".

The qualification goes to the heart of one of the disagreements between Washington and Pyongyang -- the North wants the US to make concessions step-by-step along the way, particularly sanctions relief, while Washington has insisted the restrictions must remain in place until denuclearisation is completed.

- Have we been here before? -

Pyongyang has agreed to mothball Yongbyon in the past.

The main reactor was shut down in 1994 under an agreement with Washington, only to be restarted in 2003 after the deal was derailed.

Another agreement to shut down the reactor was signed in 2007, and the North blew up a cooling tower as a token of its commitment.

But that deal also fell apart when relations soured and Pyongyang reactivated the reactor, using river water to cool it.

Experts say previous broken promises show that simple deactivation will not be enough.

"This demonstrates the need for (1) verification by trusted inspectors, (2) acceptance that somethings can be reversed, (3) the ability to reverse economic inducements," tweeted Melissa Hanham, a researcher at the One Earth Future foundation.

- How could it be checked? -

In the past North Korea has allowed in UN nuclear inspectors in exchange for concessions. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) officials carried out checks from 1994 to 2002 and again from 2007 to 2009.

But Pyongyang expelled them in 2009 ahead of the second of its six nuclear tests and has since refused to allow international inspections on its territory.

US President Donald Trump urged North Korea's Kim Jong Un to go "all in" during their high-stakes nuclear negotiations but talks floundered amid differences over sanctions and the definition of "denuclearisation", a senior State Department official said Friday.

The two leaders travelled huge distances to Hanoi for a second summit over dismantling Pyongyang's nuclear programme but the two-day meeting broke down suddenly with the two sides failing to agree on a joint statement as scheduled.

A senior administration official, who requested anonymity, said the North Koreans wanted "many, many billions of dollars in sanctions relief" but were "unwilling to impose a complete freeze on their weapons of mass destruction programmes".

Lifting the sanctions "would in effect put us in a position of subsidising the ongoing development of weapons of mass destruction in North Korea," the official added. "The weapons themselves need to be on the table."

"The President in his discussions challenged the North Koreans to go bigger. The president encouraged Chairman Kim to go all in. And we were going to -- we were prepared to go all in as well," he said.

North Korea's foreign minister convened journalists from a handful of countries for a surprise midnight press conference in Hanoi to present Pyongyang's position that it had only requested partial sanctions relief.

In return -- and in what the minister Ri Yong Ho called a "realistic proposal" -- the North had offered to "permanently and completely dismantle all the nuclear production facilities in the Yongbyon area, in the presence of US experts".

But one of the problems was a precise definition of what is located at Yongbyon -- an enormous complex containing "more than 300 different separate facilities", the US official noted.

"What the North Koreans proposed to us was closing down a portion of the Yongbyon complex."

A further sticking point was the ever-thorny issue of an exact definition of "denuclearisation".

While Washington wants North Korea to give up its nuclear weapons programme, Pyongyang sees denuclearisation more broadly.

The North's view includes an end to sanctions and what it sees as US threats -- usually including the American military presence in South Korea, and sometimes in the wider region.

The official said the definition was extensively discussed at working-group level but "they haven't agreed to it".

Despite the chasms still separating the two sides, the official -- like his boss Trump -- sought to strike a positive tone.

"We're actually encouraged by where we're going," he said."

"We didn't get close enough at this summit but we're encouraged by the opportunities ahead of us."

Trump, Kim end summit abruptly but say dialogue still alive
Hanoi (AFP) Feb 28, 2019 - The United States and North Korea on Friday put forward starkly different accounts over the breakdown of a high-stakes summit in Hanoi but offered guarded hope that they could meet again.

After weeks of building expectations and with a signing ceremony ready to go, President Donald Trump abruptly ended his second-ever meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and declared a deadlock.

"Sometimes you have to walk and this was just one of those times," an unusually downbeat Trump told reporters.

"Basically they wanted the sanctions lifted in their entirety and we couldn't do that," Trump said before flying back to Washington.

In an exceptionally rare meeting with reporters, North Korean Foreign Minister Ri Yong Ho summoned the press in Hanoi at midnight and denied the White House account that Pyongyang was only seeking a complete deal.

North Korea had offered to "permanently and completely dismantle all the nuclear production facilities" at its main complex in Yongbyon if the US dropped sanctions "that hamper the civilian economy and the livelihood of our people", Ri said.

He warned that the North's stance was "invariable" and that its offer will "never change".

But North Korean state media -- which less than two years ago was branding Trump a "mentally deranged US dotard" -- offered a more conciliatory take, saying the summit had been "productive".

Kim and Trump "agreed to continue having productive talks to discuss the denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula and the improvement of US-North Korea relations", the Korean Central News Agency said.

The North Koreans appeared to be thinking through their response to the often unpredictable Trump, who insisted that he could obtain a better deal.

"I'd much rather do it right than do it fast," Trump told reporters, reaffirming his "close relationship" with Kim.

"There's a warmth that we have and I hope that stays, I think it will."

Trump also said he hoped to see Kim again soon but offered no details.

- 'It will take a little while' -

The outcome in Hanoi fell far short of hopes that the meeting would build on the leaders' summit in Singapore in June, which marked a historic first but resulted only in a vague commitment to "work toward complete denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula".

Progress subsequently stalled, with the two sides disagreeing on what that means.

The US president has since frequently dangled the prospect of a brighter economic future for a nuclear-free North Korea, at one point tweeting there was "AWESOME" potential.

But it was not enough.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who accompanied Trump, said both sides "need to regroup" before agreeing to another meeting, adding: "My sense is it will take a little while."

Pompeo however also said "there's still a basis for believing that we can move forward".

Beyond the sub-par summit result, Trump came under fire at home for saying that Kim "didn't know" about the torture of an American college student jailed in the North.

Otto Warmbier, who was arrested for allegedly taking down a poster, returned home in 2017 in a coma and died soon afterward, with a US judge ruling that the 22-year-old had died from torture.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she thought there was "something wrong" with a US president choosing to believe "thugs" such as Kim and Russian President Vladimir Putin over the US intelligence community.

- 'Major failure' -

With a table already prepared for a working lunch and signing ceremony, Trump moved up his final news conference by two hours as he and Kim left without any accord.

"This is a major failure," tweeted Joe Cirincione, president of the Ploughshares Fund peace foundation, saying it showed the limits of top-level summitry with "not enough time or staff" to work out a deal.

Trump flew around the world for the meeting and Kim undertook a mammoth two-and-a-half-day trek through China in his olive green train, travelling 4,000 kilometres (2,500 miles).

Trump headed home, and Kim will stay on in Hanoi for a state visit.

The US leader placed calls from Air Force One to the leaders of US allies Japan and South Korea to discuss the summit, Sanders said.

Seoul said that Trump "expressed regret" to President Moon Jae-in, who helped arrange the summits, over not striking a deal with Kim.

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, a longstanding hawk on North Korea, told reporters that he "fully supports President Trump's decision to make no easy compromise".

In China, North Korea's primary ally, foreign ministry spokesman Lu Kang voiced understanding, saying that "solving this problem is definitely not something that can be achieved overnight"

- 'Rocket man' -

As in Singapore, the two men put on a show of bonhomie in Vietnam -- a far cry from 2017, when Trump was mocking Kim as "rocket man" and threatening to "totally destroy" North Korea over its nuclear and missile tests.

The two leaders, nearly 40 years apart in age, appeared to share jokes in front of reporters and indulged in a poolside stroll Thursday around the gardens of the luxury Metropole Hotel.

Before the summit, there was talk that there could be a political declaration ending the 1950-53 Korean War, which finished technically with an armistice rather than a peace treaty.

Trump's failure to clinch a deal paradoxically brought him praise within his Republican Party -- some members had privately fretted that he was too eager to seal a historic accord.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said that Trump "should be commended for his personal commitment to persuading Kim Jong Un to pursue a different path -- and for walking away when it became clear North Korea was not ready to commit enough to denuclearisation."


Related Links
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com


Thanks for being here;
We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain.

With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords.

Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year.

If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.
SpaceDaily Contributor
$5 Billed Once


credit card or paypal
SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter
$5 Billed Monthly


paypal only


NUKEWARS
Nuclear weapons on menu at Trump-Kim dinner
Hanoi (AFP) Feb 26, 2019
Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un meet Wednesday in Hanoi for the second date in an unlikely friendship that the US president hopes will push North Korea's reclusive leader closer to reaching a deal on his nuclear arsenal. Trump touched down late Tuesday on Air Force One after flying half way around the world from Washington, while Kim arrived earlier, following a two-and-a-half-day train journey from Pyongyang. On completing their marathon trips, the protagonists of international diplomacy's most su ... read more

Comment using your Disqus, Facebook, Google or Twitter login.



Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle

NUKEWARS
Raytheon and General Dynamics to operate Reagan Ballistic Missile Test Site

Poland to buy US rocket system for $414 million

U.S. Army to purchase Israel's Iron Dome anti-missile system

US Army to buy two Israeli Iron Dome air defense systems

NUKEWARS
Lockheed awarded $33.4M for cost reduction work on LRASM

Saab contracted to upgrade Australian Army's rocket warning system

Israel Aerospace Industries shows off 'loitering' missile at India air show

UAE signs major missile deals with US giant Raytheon

NUKEWARS
Boeing unveils fighter jet-sized drone designed for Australia

Exyn launches autonomous aerial robot for underground mine mapping and inspection

NASA tests urban drone traffic management in Nevada, Texas

Illegally drones pose an outsized risk for US aviation and the public

NUKEWARS
Raytheon awarded $406M for Army aircraft radio system

Lockheed Martin to develop cyber electronic warfare pod for UAVs

Britain to spend $1.3M for satellite antennas in light of Brexit

Reflectarray Antenna offers high performance in small package: DARPA

NUKEWARS
U.S. Army orders tactical vehicles from Oshkosh Defense

BAE delivers first four BvS10 all-terrain vehicles to Austria

SU engineers create rubbery 'smart' material to treat open wounds, infections and cancer

Army to test lighter body armor vest as part of total protection system

NUKEWARS
French group Thales forecasts profit rise after 'excellent' 2018

Global arms control architecture 'collapsing': UN

Germany under fire for Saudi arms export ban

British investigators drop probes on Rolls-Royce, GSK

NUKEWARS
Joint military exercise in Qatar with U.S., regional partners a success

Poland says will spend 43 bn euros on military upgrade

Turkey seeks 110 more arrests over Gulen ties

Japan's Okinawa votes on controversial US base move

NUKEWARS
A new spin in nano-electronics

Nanoparticle computing takes a giant step forward

Breakthrough nanoscience discovery made on flight from New York to Jerusalem

Customized mix of materials for three-dimensional micro- and nanostructures









The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us.