|
. | . |
|
by Staff Writers Washington (AFP) July 29, 2014 US officials pledged Tuesday that any deal struck with Iran would include a strict monitoring regime to thwart any bid by Iranian leaders to covertly try to develop nuclear weapons. But top US negotiator Wendy Sherman would not be drawn by lawmakers on whether Washington and its partners would seek to extend the complex talks beyond a new November 24 deadline. "Transparency and monitoring is absolutely critical and core to any agreement. As I said, one of the pathways of greatest concern is, of course, covert action," Sherman told the Senate Foreign Relations committee. For every measure laid out in any deal with Iran to rein in its suspect nuclear program "we will decide whether in fact an additional element of transparency and monitoring is needed over the entire duration of this agreement," she insisted. Marathon talks between Iran and world powers in Vienna ended on July 19 after negotiators gave themselves four more months to try and bridge major gaps and strike a historic nuclear deal. But, pressed on whether the US and its allies in the so-called P5+1 group would refuse any further extension of the talks, Sherman demurred. "I have learned in negotiations that it is very difficult to say what will happen at the end of any given period of time," the State Department's under secretary said. "Our intent is absolutely to end this on November 24th in one direction or another." The skilled diplomat, who has led the US negotiating team for years, revealed the talks had only been extended for four months and not the full six allowed under an interim agreement "because we thought we would just get to month five before anything would happen." It remains unclear when the next phase of the talks will start, or where the negotiations will be held, although talks are expected on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in September. "I cannot tell you today that our diplomacy will succeed, because I am not sure that it will. I can tell you that in the past six months, we have made significant and steady progress," Sherman said. "Our goal is to structure an agreement that would make any attempt to break out of such an agreement so visible and so time-consuming that Iran would either be deterred from trying or stopped before it could succeed." If all efforts fail, "we will have very serious decisions to make," Sherman said. "If Iran will not reach a comprehensive agreement that cuts off all of their pathways to a nuclear weapon and that gives the international community assurance we're looking for, then we will step up right with you to additional sanctions and to considering all of the options which the president of the United States says remain on the table."
Related Links Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com All about missiles at SpaceWar.com Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service. |