![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
. | ![]() |
. |
![]()
India's defence minister Tuesday defended a military pact with Washington signed in June that paves the way for joint weapons production and cooperation on missile defence, saying it did not compromise national security. "The document, more than anything else, signals the United States' willingness to enhance defence cooperation with India and strengthen our defence capabilities," Pranab Mukherjee told parliament, the Press Trust of India news agency reported. "It is an enabling document that provides a framework within which specific cooperation can take place. It is up to us how we develop this. This will not be dictated to us. It will be decided by mutual agreement," he said. It was in India's interest to see how New Delhi could exploit this "change of attitude" to its advantage, he added. The 10-year accord concluded during Mukherjee's visit to Washington has been opposed by communists who provide crucial outside support to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's coalition government. Under the "New Framework for the US-India Defense Relationship", New Delhi and Washington have agreed to set up a defense procurement and production group to oversee defense trade, as well as prospects for co-production and technology collaboration." The two countries would also "enhance capabilities to combat the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction," the agreement says but Mukherjee gave no indication of whether New Delhi would join the US-led Proliferation Security Initiative aimed at stopping shipments of weapons of mass destruction. Critics of the deal have questioned the "haste" and "secrecy" with which it was concluded, citing Mukherjee's own statements ahead of his departure to Washington that the visit would be "exploratory" in nature. In his statement to parliament Mukherjee said the accord contained only "enabling provisions" and "does not contain any commitments or obligations". He also denied claims by the communists that the deal promoted US security interests only. Last week, Singh defended the deal and denied claims it would limit the country's nuclear weapons program. All rights reserved. � 2005 Agence France-Presse. Sections of the information displayed on this page (dispatches, photographs, logos) are protected by intellectual property rights owned by Agence France-Presse. As a consequence, you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any of the content of this section without the prior written consent of Agence France-Presse. Related Links SpaceWar Search SpaceWar Subscribe To SpaceWar Express ![]() ![]() Manmohan Singh, the Indian prime minister, expressed "great satisfaction" at the nuclear deal he was offered by the Bush administration in Washington this week. As well he might. But the agreement could ultimately come to be regarded as the most dangerous and reckless move of George Bush's presidency.
|
![]() |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2016 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service. |