 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| . |  |
. |
Attack on Iran would be 'very destabilizing' -- US military chief
Washington (AFP) July 5, 2009 A US military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities would be "very destabilizing," top US military commander Admiral Mike Mullen said Sunday, warning that any attack could have serious "unintended consequences." "I've been one who has been concerned about a strike on Iran for some time, because it could be very destabilizing, and it is the unintended consequences of that which aren't predictable," the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff told the Fox News Sunday television program. "That said, I think it's very important as we deal with Iran that we don't take any options, including military options, off the table," Mullen told Fox News. But the top commander declined to say whether the danger posed by a nuclear-armed Iran would be sufficient to outweigh the negative consequences of a US military strike on Tehran's weapons program. "I think both outcomes are really, really bad outcomes. And that speaks to the very narrow space that we have to try to resolve this so that neither one of those things occur," he said. US President Barack Obama pledged during his election campaign to open dialogue with Tehran, but the violent crackdown on Iranian protesters angered by a disputed presidential election appear to have put that plan on hold. Mullen said decisions about the future of US-Iranian engagement are "for the (US) president to make." The international community remains at odds with Tehran over its uranium enrichment program, which Iran says is intended for civilian nuclear energy but has aroused suspicion and concern worldwide. "I worry about the proliferation of the technology. I worry about other countries thinking in the region they might have to have that capability," Mullen said in a separate interview on CBS News. "It's something I'm engaged with my... Israeli counterpart on regularly," he added. Israel, which is believed to be the only nuclear-armed country in the Middle East, has expressed frequent concern about Iran's nuclear program, in part because of Tehran's aggressive stance against the Jewish state. Mullen said the US has a number of other grievances against Iran, repeating a number of longstanding accusations. "I remain very concerned about what Iran is doing. They continue to state sponsor terrorism... They are and have been a destabilizing force in both Iraq and Afghanistan," the commander said. Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com All about missiles at SpaceWar.com Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
Saudis would turn blind eye to Israeli jets en route to Iran: reportLondon (AFP) July 5, 2009 Saudi Arabia would turn a blind eye to Israeli warplanes flying over the kingdom in any raid on Iran's nuclear sites, The Sunday Times said in a report denied by Israel. Citing diplomatic sources, it said the head of Israel's Mossad intelligence service had assured Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that Saudi Arabia has tacitly agreed to the use of its airspace. ... read more |
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2009 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |
del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Google
Facebook