. Military Space News .
THE STANS
Australia cautious of Afghanistan role

CIA drones claim 'licence to kill' with impunity: UN expert
Geneva (AFP) June 2, 2010 - A UN human rights expert on Wednesday urged the United States to sideline the CIA from targeted killings using drones, warning that the practice amounted to "a licence to kill without accountability". In a report to the UN Human Rights Council, Philip Alston, the special rapporteur on extrajudicial executions, warned that the "prolific" US use of targeted killings, mainly by unmanned aircraft, was setting a damaging example that other countries would follow. "I'm particularly concerned that the United States seems oblivious to this fact when it asserts an ever-expanding entitlement for itself to target individuals across the globe," he told the 47-member council. "But this strongly asserted but ill-defined licence to kill without accountability is not an entitlement which the United States or other states can have without doing grave damage to the rules designed to protect the right to life and prevent extrajudicial executions."

Alston's study on targeted killings sharply criticised the legal arguments invoked to justify them, their civilian toll and the involvement of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). "Intelligence agencies, which by definition are determined to remain unaccountable except to their own paymasters, have no place in running programmes that kill people in other countries," Alston told the rights council. Countries had to demonstrate that they were complying with rules limiting killings of targeted individuals to those directly involved in fighting, he underlined. "The clearest challenge to this principle today comes from the programme operated by the US Central Intelligence Agency in which targeted killings are carried out from unmanned aerial vehicles or drones," Alston said. He warned that hundreds of people had been killed including innocent civilians yet the CIA criteria for targeted killings remained shrouded in official secrecy.

"In a situation in which there is no disclosure of who has been killed, for what reason, and whether innocent civilians have died, the legal principle of international accountability is, by definition, comprehensively violated," he added. The United States is conducting drone attacks in Afghanistan and in a covert manner in Pakistan's northwestern tribal belt, where officials say Islamist extremists hatch attacks on troops fighting in Afghanistan and on cities abroad. Alston contrasted CIA practice with the US military, praising an army investigation that this week blamed human error for the death of 23 civilians in a drone-borne missile attack in Afghanistan in February. "While it is by no means perfect, the US military has a relatively public accountability process," he said. The incident sparked widespread anger at the presence of international troops in Afghanistan, and an apology from the commander of NATO forces in the country.
by Staff Writers
Canberra, Australia (UPI) Jun 2, 2010
Australia's defense chief said sending more of the country's troops to Afghanistan could jeopardize the military's effectiveness in the region closer to home.

Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston, head of the Australian military, told parliamentary committee hearings in Canberra that the military came near to its deployment limit in 2006.

When East Timor asked in May 2006 for help with an outbreak of civil violence, Australia sent 3,200 defense personnel to the island.

Houston told the committee that that was a "substantial deployment" for Australia.

"At that stage I think, if memory serves me correctly, 1,400 people in Iraq, about 500 in Afghanistan and a number of people on other smaller operations, we topped out with 5,200 people deployed on operations in late June of 2006," he said.

"So I would put it to you that if we were to deploy a large force into Afghanistan we would be taking a risk in terms of looking after our regional responsibilities."

The issue of Australia sending more troops to Afghanistan arose because of speculation that Australia would take over the lead role in Oruzgan province when the Dutch leave in August.

The Dutch have been the lead country in southern operations since sending 1,600 troops there in 2006. More than 20 Dutch soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan.

Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende restated last weekend his coalition government's commitment to exit Afghanistan in August. The departure date was set in February, a day after the coalition government fell apart when the two largest parties couldn't agree to a planned withdrawal of troops.

The largest party, Balkenende's Christian Democrats Alliance, wanted to agree to a NATO request to keep soldiers in Afghanistan beyond 2010, while the Labor Party, the government's second largest party, opposed the plan.

Dutch troops were meant to have pulled out in 2008 but their deployment was extended by two years since no other NATO member state offered replacements.

The Dutch parliament voted in October that the deployment must end by August 2010.

It is widely believed that that U.S. troops will take over.

Australia's Defense Minister John Faulkner told the parliamentary committee that Australia hasn't been formally asked to fill the role of the Dutch.

Faulkner agreed with Houston that Australia must be careful not to erode its military capability closer to home.

"Our contribution, which as you know was enhanced a year ago to around 1,550 personnel, is a very significant contribution given the size of our Australian Defense Force," said Faulkner.

"The first thing I think you should take account of is the responsibilities we have in our region."

However, the Australian contingent will increase increase its training role in Afghanistan, Houston told the committee. It will take over training of all the 4th Brigade of the Afghan National Army.

More than 700 Australian troops have been mentoring two of the six kandaks, equivalent to battalions, from the 4th Brigade.

Houston said by the end of the year Australia will be training all six kandaks, which likely will be involved in offensives against insurgents in Kandahar province.

''I am pleased to say that there is growing evidence that our kandaks are maturing toward their end-state of independent operations and the Afghan soldiers themselves have shown considerable resilience under fire, and in facing the threat of improvised explosive devices,'' Houston said.

He also predicted a major turnaround in Afghanistan if the coalition forces can prevail in Kandahar province, the heart of the Taliban insurgency.

Houston praised the town hall-style meetings conducted alongside military operations as part of a more people-centric strategy by U.S. President Barack Obama.



Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
News From Across The Stans



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


THE STANS
Afghan, NATO forces retake remote area from Taliban
Kabul (AFP) June 1, 2010
Afghan and international forces have retaken a district near the Pakistan border that was overrun by Taliban militants, NATO and the government said Tuesday. The militants seized the district of Bargi Matal in rugged Nuristan province on Saturday, driving out Afghan security forces after days of fierce fighting. On Monday, NATO jets bombed the troubled region in what the alliance's Inter ... read more







The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement