. | . |
Bangkok bomb trial looms without masterminds in dock By Jerome TAYLOR Bangkok (AFP) Aug 21, 2016 Two Chinese nationals will go on trial this week for their alleged roles in a deadly bombing at a Bangkok shrine one year ago, an attack whose motive remains clouded in mystery following a murky and at times surreal investigation. The trial, which starts on Tuesday, is being held at a military court in Bangkok and is expected to last more than a year. The bombing was the worst assault of its kind in Thailand's recent history. But one year later more than a dozen key suspects named during the investigation remain at large, while analysts say Thai authorities have yet to offer a convincing motive. The small but powerful bomb packed with ball bearings killed 20 people and wounded more than 100 when it ripped through Erawan shrine in the heart of Bangkok's shopping district on August 17, 2015. The Hindu shrine is popular among ethnic Chinese visitors, who made up a majority of the dead with five from Malaysia, five from China and two from Hong Kong. Two members of China's Muslim minority Uighur population -- Yusufu Mieraili and Bilal Mohammed -- have been charged with involvement. Analysts have largely coalesced around the theory that the bombing was in revenge for the Thai junta's forcible return of 109 Uighurs to China weeks earlier. But Thai authorities have said the two incidents are unrelated and insist the bombing was carried out by a people smuggling gang angered by recent policing successes against human trafficking. The Uighur minority say they face cultural and religious repression in their homeland of Xinjiang in northwest China, and many are believed to have fled the restive region in recent years. The junta's deportations sparked international condemnation and violent protests outside Thailand's diplomatic missions in Turkey, which has given refuge to many of the Turkic-speaking group. - Confusing investigation - Throughout the investigation Thai police and military officials sent out conflicting and at times contradictory messages. Junta officials initially pointed the finger at domestic critics of their rule. Then after investigators arrested the two Uighur suspects, they refused to confirm their Chinese nationality for more than a week. Thai authorities have also refused to call the assault a terrorist attack despite the mass civilian casualties. Police eventually outlined a group of around 15 suspects, including Chinese Uighur, Turkish and Thai nationals, some of whom had either fled or allegedly organised the attack out of Turkey. But none of those people is in the dock and there has been no publicly announced attempt to seek any extraditions from Turkey. Thai police drew further attention when the force's then-chief -- who has since gone on to become head of Thailand's football federation -- handed his officers a $80,000 reward that had been open to the public. The investigation wound down shortly afterwards. Thai national Kanya Mayoon, 36, lost her sister Prani Srisuwa in the bombing. "It seemed like they just wanted to close the case quickly," she told AFP, adding that the attack had robbed her family of their main breadwinner. "I just want the real masterminds to be arrested and punished," she said. Prosecutors accuse Mohammed of placing the bomb inside a backpack at the shrine and say Mieraili was involved in transporting the device. Both deny the charges. In a statement released through his lawyer, Mohammed -- also known as Adem Karadag -- said he was an illegal migrant trying to make his way to Malaysia to find work when police raided the Bangkok flat he was staying in. The pair are being held at a prison in a military barracks in Bangkok which has been criticised by rights groups. Two people died in custody there last year. In preliminary hearings a sobbing Mohammed accused his Thai captors of beating him and denying him halal food in prison. Thai authorities have denied those allegations.
Related Links The Long War - Doctrine and Application
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |