. Military Space News .
IRAQ WARS
Blair defends Iraq war after damning inquiry report
By Alice RITCHIE
London (AFP) July 6, 2016


Condemned over Iraq, Blair fights for his reputation
London (AFP) July 6, 2016 - At times close to tears, former prime minister Tony Blair faced the world's media Wednesday to defend his place in history after the damning findings of Britain's inquiry into the Iraq war.

There was an apology -- of sorts -- from the former Labour leader, who in 1997 at the age of 43 became Britain's youngest premier in nearly two centuries.

"I express more sorrow, regret and apology than you may ever know or can believe," said a hoarse-sounding Blair, his voice breaking.

He also insisted that memories of events around the invasion -- which led to the death of more than 150,000 Iraqis and 179 British soldiers -- would never leave him.

"There will not be a day of my life where I don't relive or rethink what happened," he told the news conference at London's Admiralty House, once home to wartime prime minister Winston Churchill.

But after nearly two hours of talking and a barrage of questions from journalists, Blair was still adamant that he had taken the right decisions on Iraq despite the serious flaws in planning and execution which dogged the US-led invasion in 2003.

The man known as "The Master" at Westminster now looks set to slip back into his lucrative career of advising foreign governments, despite threats from some MPs that they will try and impeach him via a law last used in 1806.

A defiant Blair said he could not accept a whole string of the Chilcot report's central findings, including that it was unnecessary to invade Iraq in March 2003.

"I believe we made the right decision and the world is better and safer" without toppled Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, he said.

"They want me to say what I can't in all frankness say -- that we should have taken a different decision. I'm sorry if people find that difficult to reconcile," Blair added.

- Conspiracy theories? -

His comments came a few hours after retired civil servant John Chilcot finally announced the findings of his inquiry into Britain's role in the war after seven years.

More than 100 anti-war protestors had gathered outside the venue where Chilcot spoke shouting "Blair lied, thousands died".

Perhaps seeking to avoid similar scenes, Blair's aides only gave journalists 15 minutes' notice of his news conference -- though he did stay to answer their questions for "as long as you want".

He could not resist a snipe at those who accuse him of lying over his motives for invading Iraq -- a claim which has become commonplace in Britain since he resigned as premier in 2007.

"Neither history nor the fierce and raucous conduct of modern politics, with all its love of conspiracy theory and its addiction to believing the worst of everyone, should falsify my motive," he said.

"I did it because I thought it right," he said.

One of Britain's most popular ever politicians when he won his first election by a landslide in the 1990s, Blair now has an approval rating of -67 percent, according to pollsters YouGov.

At 63, Blair is still relatively young and reportedly interested in senior political jobs.

An article he wrote for the Daily Telegraph last week was seen by some commentators as an informal pitch for a job helping to negotiate Britain's exit from the European Union following last month's referendum.

But for all the deft political touch exhibited at Wednesday's press conference, some of the reaction demonstrated how toxic his Iraq legacy remains.

Blair's name was trending on Twitter after his press conference and many comments referred to him having "blood on his hands".

"It will take many hours to read Sir John's magnum opus, and there will be much to learn from his findings," wrote political commentator Matthew d'Ancona in a column for Wednesday's Evening Standard newspaper.

Former British prime minister Tony Blair's case for going to war in Iraq in 2003 was based on flawed evidence and woefully executed, a hard-hitting official inquiry pronounced on Wednesday.

The long-awaited Chilcot report offered a damning verdict on Britain's role in the US-led war, detailing the flawed intelligence, questionable legal basis and inadequate preparation for the occupation.

The report said Britain deployed troops before diplomatic options had been exhausted.

It also highlighted how Blair wrote to president George W. Bush in July 2002, the year before the war saying: "I will be with you, whatever."

The inquiry found that "military action in Iraq might have been necessary at some point. But in March 2003 there was no imminent threat from Saddam Hussein," the Iraqi dictator.

Blair mounted a passionate defence of his decisions, telling reporters "I believe we made the right decision and the world is better and safer" without Hussein in a two-hour press conference.

His voice cracking with emotion, Blair said he had "more sorrow, regret and apology than you may ever know or can believe" for some mistakes in the planning of a war that deeply divided Britain.

Anti-war protesters rallied in London as the report was released, shouting: "Blair lied, thousands died" and "war criminal Tony Blair."

Newspaper front pages were scathing, with The Times describing it as "Blair's private war" and the Daily Mail calling the former prime minister "A monster of delusion".

Iraq's descent into violence and loss of life following the invasion saw 150,000 Iraqis killed by the time most British troops left in 2009.

In Iraq, still wracked by violence and reeling from a suicide bomb that killed at least 250 in Baghdad this week, the findings counted for little.

"What report?" Iraqi foreign ministry spokesman Ahmed Jamal responded when asked for comment.

"The report... will not change anything -- all this is empty talk," said Zainab Hassan, aged 60.

- 'A catastrophe' -

The war was justified at the time by claims that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, but they were never found and the intelligence was later withdrawn.

Inquiry chairman John Chilcot laid the blame for this firmly on spy chiefs, clearing Blair's officials of "improperly" influencing a key intelligence paper published in September 2002.

The report also criticised Blair for failing to challenge Bush on the lack of planning for the post-invasion phase -- and dismissed his assertion that the impact of local militia and Iran could not have been predicted.

"There were no lies, parliament and cabinet were not misled, there was no secret commitment to war. The intelligence was not falsified and the decision was made in good faith," said Blair, who was prime minister from 1997 to 2007.

Shortly afterwards current Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn -- a top figure in the anti-war campaign -- directly contradicted his predecessor Blair.

"The invasion and occupation of Iraq was a catastrophe," Corbyn, who formed the Stop the War coalition, said in a speech to the families of British soldiers who died.

"I now apologise sincerely on behalf of my party for the disastrous decision to go to war in Iraq," he said.

Relatives of some of the 179 British soldiers who died in Iraq said they would scrutinise the findings for possible grounds for legal action against Blair and other officials.

"The inquiry has confirmed all our fears that these young men and women were deployed on the back of a falsehood," said Roger Bacon, whose son Matthew, 34, died in 2005.

- 'Went badly wrong' -

The legality of the invasion was not in his remit, but Chilcot said the process of deciding the legal basis for war was "far from satisfactory".

"We have concluded that the UK chose to join the invasion of Iraq before the peaceful options for disarmament had been exhausted. Military action at that time was not a last resort," he said.

The families are not the only ones considering legal action against Blair -- a cross-party group of MPs is also looking into the possibility, including of taking a case to the International Criminal Court.

The war, which at one point saw 46,000 British troops deployed, mostly in southern Iraq around the strategic oil hub of Basra, still looms large over British politics.

Britain's scarring experience in Iraq has made it deeply wary of committing ground troops to international military interventions in countries like Syria and Libya.

Retired civil servant Chilcot said his report was "an account of an intervention which went badly wrong, with consequences to this day".

In a statement to the House of Commons, Prime Minister David Cameron said: "We cannot turn the clock back but can ensure that lessons are learned and acted on".

Former US president Bush praises Britain's role in Iraq War
Washington (AFP) July 6, 2016 - Former US president George W. Bush reiterated his belief Wednesday that the world is "better off" without Saddam Hussein, as a damning inquiry blasted Britain's part in the rush for war with Iraq in 2003.

"Despite the intelligence failures and other mistakes he has acknowledged previously, President Bush continues to believe the whole world is better off without Saddam Hussein in power," Bush's spokesman Freddy Ford said in a statement.

"He is deeply grateful for the service and sacrifice of American and coalition forces in the war on terror. And there was no stronger ally than the United Kingdom under the leadership of Prime Minister Tony Blair."

Britain's former prime minister was at the center of a detailed inquiry that probed Britain's role in the US-led war, examining the flawed intelligence, questionable legal basis and "woefully inadequate" preparation for the occupation.

Ford noted that Bush had not yet had the chance to read the lengthy enquiry report.

Britain deployed troops before diplomatic options had been exhausted, the report said.

Broader reaction to the lengthy inquiry by John Chilcot was muted in the United States, with officials unwilling to weigh in on historical decisions.

President Barack Obama's "longstanding opposition to the invasion of Iraq is well known and has been extensively litigated," White House spokesman Josh Earnest said.

Obama "has been dealing with the consequences of that fateful decision for the entirety of his presidency. Future presidents will likely have to do the same," he added. "It is important that the United States... learn the lessons of those past mistakes."

John Kirby, a spokesman for Secretary of State John Kerry, said the current administration is focused on the current crises in Iraq and Syria.

"Our focus is on trying to get a political transition in Syria, trying to defeat Daesh (the Islamic State group) in Iraq and Syria; trying to help Prime Minister (Haider al-)Abadi make the necessary political and economic reforms he knows he needs to make in his country," he said.

"That's where Secretary Kerry's head is, and we're not interested in re-litigating the decisions that led to the Iraq war in 2003."

Defense Secretary Ashton Carter declined to comment on the Chilcot report.


Thanks for being here;
We need your help. The SpaceDaily news network continues to grow but revenues have never been harder to maintain.

With the rise of Ad Blockers, and Facebook - our traditional revenue sources via quality network advertising continues to decline. And unlike so many other news sites, we don't have a paywall - with those annoying usernames and passwords.

Our news coverage takes time and effort to publish 365 days a year.

If you find our news sites informative and useful then please consider becoming a regular supporter or for now make a one off contribution.
SpaceDaily Contributor
$5 Billed Once


credit card or paypal
SpaceDaily Monthly Supporter
$5 Billed Monthly


paypal only


.


Related Links
Iraq: The first technology war of the 21st century






Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle

Previous Report
IRAQ WARS
Iraq war casts long shadow over UK foreign policy
London (AFP) July 6, 2016
Britain's war in Iraq, to be examined in a major report due out Wednesday, instilled a deep sense of distrust towards military intervention that still casts a shadow over foreign policy, analysts say. The decision to join the US-led invasion in 2003 on the basis of flawed intelligence, the occupation and Iraq's bloody descent into sectarian violence, have been examined in detail by the Chilc ... read more


IRAQ WARS
Raytheon's air and missile defense radar to be tested

Poland moves towards multi-billion-euro Patriot missile deal

Saudi intercepts ballistic missile from Yemen: coalition

Raytheon to conduct Patriot missile system diagnostics and repair

IRAQ WARS
IAI successfully tests MRSAM defense system

Raytheon gets $23M Evolved Sea Sparrow contract

Varunastra missile handed over to Indian navy

Missiles to be tested at RIMPAC exercise

IRAQ WARS
US reveals death tolls from drone and air strikes

Textron's Shadow UAS passes 1 million flight hours

US-led forces destroy own combat drone after Syria crash

Brazil's Casador drone takes first flight

IRAQ WARS
MUOS-5 secure communications satellite responding to ground control

How to Improve Enterprise Ground Services for Space

Testing Confirms Intelsat EpicNG Delivers a Whole New Ballgame

MUOS-5 Secure Communications Satellite to launch June 24

IRAQ WARS
Spain drops first GBU-48 from Eurofighter Typhoon

Finland in talks to buy used S. Korea howitzers

Northrop receives $103M counter-IED contract mod

Raytheon given U.S. Army projectile contract mod

IRAQ WARS
Guns, not roses: Conflicts fire up Bulgaria arms trade

CAE gets $111 million in UAE defense contracts

Senators look to block U.S. sale of bombs to Saudis for bombing of Yemen

US Navy admiral admits he lied in massive bribery scandal

IRAQ WARS
'Suwalki Gap' key to NATO's eastern flank security

Lithuania leader marks 'breakthrough' German troop deployment

Why Brexit is bad for NATO, Europe's defence

With an eye on Russia, US and Georgia ink defence pact

IRAQ WARS
Tiniest imperfections make big impacts in nano-patterned materials

DNA shaping up to be ideal framework for rationally designed nanostructures

New 'ukidama' nanoparticle structure revealed

Shaping atomically thin materials in suspended structures









The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us.