Subscribe free to our newsletters via your
. Military Space News .




WAR REPORT
British parliament rejects military action in Syria
by Staff Writers
London, England (AFP) Aug 29, 2013


US hints it could act alone on Syria
Washington, District Of Columbia (AFP) Aug 29, 2013 - The United States Thursday implicitly reserved the right to strike Syria, alone, in its own national interest, without waiting for allies to join an operation or for global approval.

The White House said President Barack Obama prized the United Nations and closely consulted allies, but that in the end, his first duty was to US national security, which he sees threatened by a Syrian chemical weapons attack.

"We certainly are interested in engaging with the global international community on this issue," said White House spokesman Josh Earnest.

"But at the same time, the president's chief accountability is to the American people that he was elected to protect.

"The president believes strongly in making the kinds of decisions and taking the kinds of steps that are necessary to protect our core national security interests that we've acknowledged are at stake in this situation."

The comments came as Britain, Washington's closest European ally struggles for a political consensus over Prime Minister David Cameron's plans to join expected US-led military action in Syria.

The political fracas in London has sparked speculation that a timetable for action, which many observers believe could see air strikes in Syria within days, could slip.

But at the State Department, spokeswoman Marie Harf said that "we make our own decisions in our own timeline," though styled international consultations on Syria as "incredibly important."

The Obama administration also hinted that unlike Britain, it did not see the need to wait for a report by UN inspectors in Syria on the chemical attack on a Damascus suburb on August 21.

"It's not within the mandate of those UN inspectors to assess the responsibility for the use of those weapons -- it's just within their mandate to assess whether or not they were used," Earnest said.

"That's no longer an open question."

On Wednesday, the Obama administration said that it did not see any future in a British bid to secure a mandate from the UN Security Council for attacking Syria, due to Russian opposition.

Administration officials have said that Obama sees perils for US national security in the belief that Syria shattered international norms by using chemical weapons, and that US interests and allies could be threatened.

"The Syrian regime's use of chemical weapons against their own people presents a situation where, yes, US national security interests are threatened," said Harf.

US officials are concerned that the Syria's chemical weapons stocks, as well as being used by civilians, could eventually fall into the hands of terror groups or radicals opposed to the United States.

British lawmakers voted against military action in Syria on Thursday in a stunning defeat for Prime Minister David Cameron.

The government was defeated by just 13 votes in the House of Commons in its bid for a "strong humanitarian response" to the alleged use of chemical weapons by the Syrian regime.

Minutes after the shock result, Cameron told lawmakers: "It is clear to me that the British parliament, reflecting the views of the British people, does not want to see British military action.

"I get that, and the government will act accordingly."

Cameron's defeat raises the prospects that the United States could act alone against the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, which it blames for horrific poison gas attacks that are believed to have killed hundreds in the suburbs of Damascus last week.

"Britain will not be involved in any military action," a spokesman for Cameron's Downing Street office confirmed.

Seven hours of impassioned debate in the House of Commons had revealed deep divisions over whether military strikes against the Assad regime would deter the further use of chemical weapons, or simply make the conflict worse.

Cameron had made the case for targeted strikes, insisting that Britain could not stand idle in the face of "one of the most abhorrent uses of chemical weapons in a century".

"If nothing is done, (the regime) will conclude that it can use these weapons again and again, and on a larger scale, and with impunity," he had told parliament.

But he faced strong resistance from the opposition Labour party and many members of his own Conservative party, who expressed fear that Britain was rushing to a war without conclusive evidence that Assad had gassed his own people.

Cameron admitted there could not be "100 percent certainty" about who had committed the attack, but said it was "beyond doubt" that the regime was responsible.

Britain's Joint Intelligence Committee released evidence Thursday saying that chemical weapons had undoubtedly been used on August 21 and that more than 300 people had been killed.

It was "highly likely" that the Syrian government was responsible, it added.

The regime has denied it committed the attack, which it blames on rebel forces.

Britain's Labour party had proposed an alternative motion seeking "compelling" evidence that the regime carried out the attack before committing to any form of military action, but this too was defeated.

Cameron had recalled MPs from their summer break for the emergency debate, which saw the government's motion defeated by 285 votes to 272.

In a severe blow to the prime minister's authority, 30 of his own Conservatives voted against the motion, along with nine members of his junior coalition partners, the Liberal Democrats.

Defence Secretary Philip Hammond warned that the result would "put a strain" on Britain's so-called special relationship with the United States.

"The Americans do understand the parliamentary process that we have to go through," he told BBC television.

"They have always understood that in order to be involved in military action we would have to secure the consent of parliament."

The spectre of the Iraq war came up many times during the long hours of debate.

In 2003, the British parliament gave then prime minister Tony Blair the go-ahead to join the US-led invasion of Iraq on the basis of allegations that dictator Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.

The weapons never materialised and Britain became embroiled in the war for years.

But Cameron insisted: "This is not like Iraq. What we are seeing in Syria is fundamentally different."

In a humiliating climbdown, Cameron had already been forced to agree late Wednesday that Britain would not take part in any military strikes before United Nations inspectors report back from the site of the attack -- meaning a second vote, possibly next week, would have been necessary.

Opinion polls suggest that the British public are strongly against involvement in military strikes against Syria.

A YouGov poll for The Times found that only 22 percent supported firing missiles against Syrian military sites.

Britain had dispatched six Typhoon fighter jets to its Akrotiri base on Cyprus as a "protective measure" on Thursday, although the defence ministry said the planes would not take part in any direct military action.

.


Related Links






Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle








WAR REPORT
Protest against Iraq PM blocks highway to Syria, Jorda
Ramadi, Iraq (AFP) Dec 23, 2012
About 2,000 Iraqi protesters, demanding the ouster of premier Nuri al-Maliki, blocked on Sunday a highway in western Iraq leading to Syria and Jordan, an AFP correspondent reported. The protesters, including local officials, religious and tribal leaders, turned out in Ramadi, the capital of Sunni province of Anbar, to demonstrate against the arrest of nine guards of Finance Minister Rafa al- ... read more


WAR REPORT
Modernized Patriot system aces PAC-3 test

US missile shield safeguards not enough for compromise

LockMar Receives Contract Modification For PAC-3 Missiles

Rafael gears up for Israel's new defense era

WAR REPORT
New Iran launchpad for ballistic missile tests: experts

Raytheon receives contract for advanced Standard Missile-3

US Army and USAF intercept cruise missile for first time with JLENS-guided AMRAAM

Rolling Airframe Missile Block 2 completes initial fleet firing

WAR REPORT
Yemen asked US for drones: president

Puma AE Small Unmanned Aircraft Achieves Continuous Flight for More Than Nine Hours

US Air Force lacks volunteers to operate drones

MQ-8B Fire Scout Unmanned Helicopter Passes 5,000 Flight Hours In Afghanistan

WAR REPORT
New Military Communications Satellite Built By Lockheed Martin Launches

US Navy Poised to Launch Lockheed Martin-Built Secure Communications Satellite for Mobile Users

Northrop Grumman Moves New B-2 Satellite Communications Concept to the High Ground

Canada links up on secure U.S. military telecoms network

WAR REPORT
Israel restarts Merkava tank production

Blast at US naval station wounds eight: officers

Boeing Reaches 250,000-Kit Milestone for JDAM Weapon Program

Boeing EMARSS Aircraft Begin US Army Flight Tests

WAR REPORT
Japan eyes defence budget increase, Marines-like unit

Shrinking defense budgets affect military aircraft industry

Offices of German defense contractors raided in Greece bribe probe

Lithuania to extradite Russian to US in arms case

WAR REPORT
China warns US against meddling in Hong Kong politics

Hagel issues warning over Asian maritime disputes

Russia to deploy jets to Belarus

Japan irritated by comments from UN's Ban

WAR REPORT
Toxic nanoparticles might be entering human food supply

Plasma-treated nano filters help purify world water supply

Graphene nanoscrolls are formed by decoration of magnetic nanoparticles

New tests for determining health and environmental effects of nanomaterials




The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement