. | . |
China imposes feared Hong Kong security law By Laurie Chen with Jerome Taylor in Hong Kong Beijing (AFP) June 30, 2020 China imposed a sweeping national security law on Hong Kong Tuesday, dramatically tightening its grip on the semi-autonomous city in a historic move decried by Western nations as a threat to the financial hub's freedoms. Described by Beijing as a "sword" hanging over the heads of those endangering national security, the law took effect hours after it was signed by President Xi Jinping and just six weeks since it was first unveiled. Fed up with pro-democracy protests that rocked the city last year, China's top lawmaking body enacted the legislation following closed-door deliberations that kept details secret until its passage. The law gives Beijing jurisdiction over "very serious" national security crimes, with offenders facing up to life in prison, according to the text published late Tuesday. The controversial law also empowers China to set up a national security agency in the city, staffed by officials who are not bound by local law when carrying out duties. The new suite of powers radically restructures the relationship between Beijing and Hong Kong, toppling the legal firewall that has existed between the city's independent judiciary and the mainland's party-controlled courts. "It marks the end of Hong Kong that the world knew before," prominent democracy campaigner Joshua Wong tweeted as his political party Demosisto announced it was disbanding. "With sweeping powers and ill-defined law, the city will turn into a #secretpolicestate." Some Hong Kongers responded by deleting Twitter accounts and scrubbing other social media platforms. In contrast, former city leader Leung Chun-ying took to Facebook to offer bounties of up to HK$1 million ($130,000) for anyone who could help secure the first prosecutions under the new legislation or track down people who have recently fled the city. Twenty-seven countries, including Britain, France, Germany and Japan, urged Beijing to "reconsider the imposition" of the legislation, saying in a statement to the UN Human Rights Council that it "undermines" the city's freedoms. The move has also added fuel to tensions between Beijing and Washington, where condemnation of the move crossed the aisle. Top Democrat Nancy Pelosi said its "brutal purpose" was to "frighten, intimidate & suppress the speech of Hong Kongers," and Republican Mitt Romney tweeted that his "heart aches for the people of Hong Kong. Any semblance of freedom and autonomy has vanished." - 'Fundamental change' - As part of the 1997 handover from Britain, Hong Kong was guaranteed certain freedoms -- as well as judicial and legislative autonomy -- for 50 years in a deal known as "One Country, Two Systems." The formula helped to cement the city's status as a world-class business hub, bolstered by a reliable judiciary and political freedoms unseen on the mainland. Critics have long accused Beijing of chipping away at that status, but they describe the new security law as the most brazen move yet. British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said he was "deeply concerned" and that London would scrutinise the law "to understand whether it is in conflict" with the handover agreement. The law bans four types of national security crimes: subversion, secession, terrorism and colluding with foreign forces to endanger national security. The text gave three scenarios in which China might take over a prosecution -- complicated foreign interference cases, "very serious" cases and when national security faces "serious and realistic threats." Cases can be passed to mainland China, with the Supreme People's Procuratorate and the Supreme Court designating the judicial authorities handling them. Lead perpetrators and serious offenders can receive 10 years to life in prison for engaging in one of the national security crimes. The law also said certain national security cases could be held behind closed doors without juries in Hong Kong if they contained state secrets, although the verdict and eventual judgments would be made public. "It's a fundamental change that dramatically undermines both the local and international community's confidence towards Hong Kong's 'One Country, Two Systems' model and its status as a robust financial centre," Hong Kong political analyst Dixon Sing told AFP. - Restore stability - On the mainland, national security laws are routinely used to jail critics, especially for the vague offence of "subversion." Beijing and Hong Kong's government reject those allegations. They have said the law will only target a minority of people, will not harm political freedoms in the city and will restore business confidence after a year of historic pro-democracy protests. "I urge the international community to respect our country's right to safeguard national security and Hong Kong people's aspirations for stability and harmony," Hong Kong city leader Carrie Lam told the UN Human Rights Council in a video message on Tuesday. Millions took to the streets last year, while a hard core of protesters frequently battled police in often violent confrontations that saw more than 9,000 arrested. Hong Kong has banned protests in recent months, citing previous unrest and the coronavirus pandemic, although local transmissions have ended. Some Western nations warned of potential repercussions ahead of the security law's passing. However, many are also wary of incurring Beijing's wrath and losing lucrative access to the mainland's huge economy. "We deplore this decision," said European Council head Charles Michel. Washington -- which has embarked on a trade war with China -- has said the security law means Hong Kong no longer enjoys sufficient autonomy from the mainland to justify special status. The United States on Monday ended sensitive defence exports to Hong Kong over the law, prompting China to threaten unspecified "countermeasures."
Hong Kong national security law: five key facts you need to know The law was fast-tracked by Beijing after the semi-autonomous city was rocked by months of widespread pro-democracy protests last year. Communist Party officials in Beijing have condemned the protesters as violent, foreign-backed separatists. The legislation will raise serious questions over the independence of Hong Kong's legal system guaranteed by its mini-constitution, and will have far-reaching consequences on life in the city of 7.5 million people. Here are five key things you need to know about the controversial law: - Maximum life sentence - The four categories of criminal offence outlined in the law are: secession, subversion of state power, terrorist activities and collusion with foreign and external forces to endanger national security. Lead perpetrators and serious offenders can receive a maximum life sentence, or long-term imprisonment of 10 years and above for offences in all categories. Criminal acts under the category of foreign collusion include: inciting Hong Kong residents' hatred of the Hong Kong or Chinese government, electoral manipulation or sabotage, and sanctions against Hong Kong or China. Meanwhile, damaging public transport and certain public facilities would be classified as terrorism under the law. Anyone who organises or takes part in acts aimed at splitting the country, regardless of whether they use violence or not, would be committing an offence. Those convicted would be barred from standing in any Hong Kong elections. - Chinese jurisdiction over 'very serious' crimes - Prior to its passage, the law stoked widespread fears over the demise of Hong Kong's independent legal system. According to the law, China may take over the entire prosecution from arrest to trial for: complicated foreign interference cases, "very serious" cases and cases where national security faces "serious and realistic threats". "Both the national security agency and Hong Kong can request to pass the case to mainland China," the law stated. In China's opaque judicial system, criminal cases typically have a conviction rate of over 99 percent. Human rights advocates claim that some national security cases are highly likely to be politically motivated, with defendants denied the right to a fair and open trial. Activists, dissidents, lawyers and other opponents of the government are routinely targeted by China's own national security laws, and often subjected to prolonged extralegal detention and even torture while awaiting trial. - Secret trials, no jury - The law states that certain national security cases could be held behind closed doors without juries in Hong Kong if they contained state secrets, although the verdict and eventual judgements would be made public. City leader Carrie Lam will personally appoint judges for national security cases, but their terms are limited to one year. Defendants will not be granted bail "unless the judge has sufficient reason to believe they will not continue to commit acts that endanger national security". - New national security agency - The controversial law empowers China to set up a national security agency in the city, staffed by officials who are not bound by local law when carrying out duties. "The Hong Kong government has no jurisdiction over the national security agency in Hong Kong and its staff when they are discharging duties provided in this law," the text said. Hong Kong's Justice Department is also required by the law to set up its own prosecution department for national security crimes, whose head will be appointed by Carrie Lam. The law gives police far-reaching powers to collect evidence, including tapping communications and spying on suspects. It can also request platforms and service providers to remove information and assist in investigations. - Oversight of foreign NGOs and news organisations - Government bodies will take "necessary measures to strengthen management ... of foreign and external NGOs and news organisations" in Hong Kong, according to the law. Hong Kong's mini-constitution guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of the press, unlike in China, where the media and all forms of public commentary are heavily monitored by the government. Foreign journalists in China say they have experienced frequent harassment and intimidation from authorities, while several US journalists have been expelled from the country in recent months. The law also applies to non-permanent residents of Hong Kong that commit offences under the law, even if they are not on Hong Kong soil. Companies that violate the national security laws will be fined and may have their operations suspended.
U.S. fighter planes intercept Russian aircraft off Alaska coast Washington DC (UPI) Jun 25, 2020 North American Aerospace Defense Command F-22s intercepted two Russian IL-38 maritime patrol aircraft in the Alaskan Air Defense Identification Zone Thursday, according to NORAD. The Russian aircraft came within 50 miles of Unimak Island, which is part of the Aleutian island chain, but remained in the sky and did not enter American airspace, according to NORAD. "For the fifth time this month, NORAD has demonstrated our readiness and ability to defend the homeland by intercepting Russian ... read more
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |