. Military Space News .
THE STANS
Commentary: Afghan quagmire

Seven British soldiers killed in Afghanistan brought home
London (AFP) June 29, 2010 - Thousands of mourners lined the streets of a British market town Tuesday to pay their final respects to seven servicemen killed in Afghanistan, as their bodies were brought home. Families of the dead soldiers wept as hearses draped with the Union Jack flag passed through Wootton Bassett, in southwest England, after being repatriated to a nearby airbase, RAF Lyneham. The sight of fallen servicemen passing through the small town has become frequent as the British death toll in the bloody Afghan conflict mounts.

But seven bodies being brought back at the same time is rare and left many overcome with emotion. "I'm here to pay respects to these young lads. We don't have to do it, but we want to do it," said Bill Baldam, 63, who served with the RAF fire service for 12 years. "It could be my son, it could be my brother." Relatives placed flowers on top of the hearses as they paused for a minute's silence next to the town's war memorial. The quiet was broken only by the sound of weeping and church bells ringing. Four of the soldiers -- Lance Corporal David Ramsden, Colour Sergeant Martyn Horton, Private Alex Isaac and Private Douglas Halliday -- were killed on June 23 in southern Helmand province when their vehicle rolled into a waterway.

They had been part of a police advisory team travelling to attend an incident at a checkpoint. Sergeant Steven Darbyshire was killed in a firefight with insurgents in the Sangin district of Helmand on June 23. Lance Corporal Michael Taylor was killed in a firefight in Helmand in June 22. Marine Paul Warren was fatally injured in an explosion during an insurgent attack on June 21. Britain has around 9,500 servicemen in Afghanistan and is the second biggest contributor of troops to international forces after the United States. Most British soldiers are stationed in Helmand. A total of 309 British servicemen have been killed in Afghanistan since operations began there in 2001.
by Arnaud De Borchgrave
Washington (UPI) Jun 29, 2010
"The Endless Game" cartoon in the Financial Times showed U.S. President Barack Obama and a Taliban insurgent batting back and forth a coffin-shaped projectile over the smoking ruin of a building.

Another in the International Herald Tribune has U.S. Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal boarding a U.S. transport as an Afghan soldier waves goodbye. Atop a nearby mountain, one Taliban fighter says to another, "THE PULLOUT HAS BEGUN!"

The two newspapers are the world's most read English-language dailies by government leaders, business executives and media throughout the world.

Perception is all too often reality. Add to the Afghan debacle syndrome that 31 out of 50 U.S. states are seen as insolvent. Some local governments are readying bankruptcy proceedings. State governments can only default; California is on the verge of taking up the option. State and local governments have unfunded retirement obligations of at least $2 trillion. But the United States still spends more on defense (Iraq and Afghanistan included) than the rest of the world put together.

Nobel Prize winner in economics Paul Krugman writes, "We are now, I fear, in the early stages of a third depression. It will probably look more like the Long Depression than the much more severe Great Depression. But the cost -- to the world economy and, above all, to the millions of lives blighted by the absence of jobs -- will nonetheless be immense."

Clearly, Obama has to show the country light at the end of the Afghan tunnel before November's mid-term elections. Public opinion support has already dropped to less than 50 percent.

Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen flew off to Afghanistan for the nth time to reassure Afghan President Hamid Karzai that nothing had changed and that four-star Gen. David Petraeus, the hero of the Iraqi surge, would soon be working his military magic against the ragtag Taliban ragamuffins.

At the same time, Pakistani army chief Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani and intelligence chief Ahmed Shuja Pasha flew in ostensibly to brief Karzai on their campaign to wipe out Taliban's privileged sanctuaries in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas. More important was the information they could now convey on the chances of a negotiated settlement with Taliban's main force.

Pakistan's decision-makers know that FATA cannot be flushed clean of Taliban sanctuaries. Insurgency groups suddenly vanish to pop back up where exhausted Pakistani troops have moved on. And Pakistani intelligence agents are in touch with some of the guerrilla formations that are allied with Taliban chief Mullah Omar, but not under his orders.

No amount of war plans for Afghanistan can work as long as both Karzai and Pakistani leaders believe that negotiations with Taliban -- or certain guerrilla factions -- are unavoidable.

The McChrystal war plan, endorsed by Petraeus in 2009, isn't working. McChrystal's last classified assessment of the war, was given to Petraeus in early June. The reality is that a "mission accomplished" report from Petraeus to Obama could take anywhere from five to 10 more years. But no one is prepared to stick around that long.

The 3,500-strong Dutch contingent, one of only four NATO members, besides the United States, authorized to engage in kinetic operations (Canada, Britain, France are the other three), is going home Aug. 15. Growing Dutch opposition toppled the government and a new one could only be cobbled on a platform of withdrawal from Afghanistan. The Canadian Parliament ordered its Afghan contingent home by 2011.

The future of NATO is at stake in the Afghan conflict. A perceived U.S. defeat in Afghanistan would make the 28-nation mutual defense treaty irrelevant. It may become irrelevant anyway. Defense budgets are being squeezed from year to year, but 20 NATO members responded to an impassioned appeal for more troops from its Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, a former Danish prime minister. About 5,000 more were pledged -- but for non-kinetic duties.

Petraeus has an encyclopedic knowledge of insurgencies throughout the ages. He is particularly knowledgeable about the French Indochina war, the French Algerian war and the U.S. Vietnam war. He sees many similarities among the three. In each case, the home front collapsed. The U.S. Congress betrayed America's South Vietnamese allies, by pulling the rug of military aid right from under them, which handed South Vietnam to North Vietnam.

As the victor of the so far successful surge in Iraq, Petraeus knows the Afghan conditions are totally different. And that the July 2011 time frame for the beginning of a U.S. troop withdrawal, as pledged by Obama, is unrealistic. This, in turn, revives fears the U.S. home front support will collapse a la Vietnam as we talk-fight-talk-fight with Taliban.

In a war where insurgents and farmers are often interchangeable, progress is hard to measure. Last February, in a highly publicized assault on Marja in bitterly contested Helmand province, U.S. and Afghan troops "liberated" a town of 80,000. Many Taliban fighters feigned to withdraw by hiding weapons and resurfacing as innocent civilians. Locals were afraid to turn them in to newly arrived Afghan authorities who, in turn, weren't willing to risk Taliban reprisals.

Marja became what McChrystal called "a bleeding ulcer." Thus, a much larger operation against Kandahar, a city of about 1 million that was the Taliban's religious capital before 9/11, was postponed.

Today's Afghan bottom line question is whether Taliban's leaders would be willing to guarantee that Osama bin Laden and his Taliban cohorts would never be allowed back. And that any breach would automatically unleash U.S. aerial reprisals. The alternative is to fight on and persevere until Taliban concede defeat and Afghanistan is turned in to a viable, self-sustaining (minerals) democratic state. And that would take us through to 2020.

Now in its ninth year, there is neither stomach nor stamina in the Western alliance for another five years, let alone 10.



Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
News From Across The Stans



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


THE STANS
Petraeus tries to reassure anxious Congress on Afghan war
Washington (AFP) June 29, 2010
General David Petraeus, named as the new commander in Afghanistan, tried to reassure an anxious Congress on Tuesday that NATO-led troops are making headway in Afghanistan, amid fraying public support for the war. Petraeus, the country's most revered military officer, told senators the coalition force "has achieved progress in several locations" this year but told them to brace for a "tough f ... read more







The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement