. Military Space News .




.
MISSILE DEFENSE
Congress seeks more U.S. aid for Iron Dome
by Staff Writers
Tel Aviv, Israel (UPI) Mar 23, 2012


Key leaders of the U.S. Congress want U.S. President Barack Obama to provide funds to help Israel, should it request it, to produce more batteries of the Iron Dome counter-rocket system.

Israel's air force has three batteries deployed to protect cities in the southern Negev Desert against rockets fired by Palestinian militants in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip but budget problems mean it can't fund more batteries needed to shield the rest of the country.

Iron Dome, which racked up a 90 percent kill rate against Palestinian Qassam and Grad rockets in recent weeks, was developed by Rafael Advanced Defense Systems and built with the help of a one-time $205 million U.S. grant in fiscal 2011.

The Iron Dome Support Act was introduced Wednesday by U.S. Rep. Howard Berman, D-Calif., ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and co-sponsored by Foreign Affairs Committee Chairwoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla.

The legislation would permit Obama to authorize further funds for the "procurement, maintenance and sustainment" of the Iron Dome system as requested by the Israeli government of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.

Reps. Gary Ackerman, D-N.Y., the ranking member of the Middle East and South Asia subcommittee; Steve Chabot, R-Ohio, chairman of that subcommittee; David Cicilline, D-R.I.; Ann Marie Buerkle, R-N.Y., signed on as co-sponsors.

Berman observed in a statement that during the latest Palestinian barrage earlier this month Iron Dome "saved innocent lives and prevented an escalation of hostilities and a full-blown crisis.

"Israel must have the ability to defend itself from rocket and missile attacks and the United States will continue to stand by our strong ally if called upon in times of need," he said.

Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak says a fourth Iron Dome battery will be deployed within the next few weeks in the south, where 1 million Israelis live within reach of extended-range rockets fired from Gaza.

However, military commanders say they'll need up to 20 batteries to afford effective protection across Israel, not just from short-range rockets fired from Gaza, but larger numbers, possibly 200 a day, from Hezbollah in Lebanon, Israel's northern neighbor.

Some Israeli politicians say Iron Dome is under-funded. Former Brig. Gen. Meir Elran of the Institute for National Security Studies says the offense-oriented air force is reluctant to cut spending on attack squadrons to buy missile-defense systems.

Iron Dome has the capability of assessing which incoming rockets and missiles will hit populated areas, and concentrates on them. Rockets that will land in open spaces aren't engaged.

The Palestinians have fired rockets in relatively small salvos, which Iron Dome clearly can counter to a large extent. But Israeli commanders say that if broadsides are fired in large numbers, Iron Dome won't be anywhere near as effective as it's been so far.

Hezbollah alone has, by Israeli count, more than 43,000 missiles and rockets, with large numbers capable of hitting anywhere in Israel.

This danger cannot be countered by Iron Dome, designed to intercept rockets with a maximum range of 43 miles.

So other systems are needed for the four-tier shield Israel plans, including combating longer range missiles such as Iran's Shehab-3b and Sejjil-2 ballistic weapons.

Rafael is developing a system named David's Sling to counter medium-range missiles.

Arrow-2, currently operational, and the developing Arrow-3 systems built by state-owned Israel Aerospace Industries, working with the Boeing Co., will take care of Iranian and Syrian ballistic weapons.

The United States has been the main funder of Arrow, first deployed in 2000 but remains untested in combat. So far costs exceed $1 billion.

Given Israel's military budgetary restrictions, the government likely will be looking increasingly toward the United States for help in financing David's Sling and Arrow-2 and with Obama facing re-election, he may have little choice but to provide Israel with hefty funding.

Arrow in particular is extremely expensive to operate. Arrow-2 has a shoot-down rate of around 90 percent in trials. But each interception costs $1 million-$2 million, compared to $25,000-$80,000 for Iron Dome.

Military planners fear Israel faces a sustained rocket and missile bombardment, possibly lasting several weeks, by Iran, Syria, Hezbollah and the Palestinians.

The cost of countering this unprecedented attack focused on the civilian population would be immense. U.S. funds would be essential.

Related Links
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com




.
.
Get Our Free Newsletters Via Email
...
Buy Advertising Editorial Enquiries






.

. Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle



MISSILE DEFENSE
Newest US Missile Warning Satellite Exceeding Performance Expectations
El Segundo CA (SPX) Mar 21, 2012
The first Space Based Infrared Systems geosynchronous earth orbit satellite, currently undergoing a rigorous operational certification process, is meeting or exceeding performance requirements, and on track to be delivered into operations. Within two months after launch, SBIRS began sharing initial GEO-1 satellite data with technical intelligence mission partners in order to enable early a ... read more


MISSILE DEFENSE
Congress seeks more U.S. aid for Iron Dome

Northrop Grumman Awarded for Missile Defense C2BMC Contract

Newest US Missile Warning Satellite Exceeding Performance Expectations

Japan says may try to shoot down N. Korean rocket

MISSILE DEFENSE
Tucson site is largest Raytheon facility to receive a superior rating

Lockheed Martin Upgrades Tactical Tomahawk Weapons Control System for Naval Air Systems Command

Raytheon Wins $77.9 Million US Army Missile Subsystem Support Contract

Raytheon Awarded US Army Contract to Counter Rockets

MISSILE DEFENSE
NRL Tests Robotic Fueling of Unmanned Surface Vessels

Russia to build mini drone

Israel assesses eye-in-the-sky platforms

Drones may be controlled by gestures

MISSILE DEFENSE
Raytheon to Continue Supporting Coalition Forces' Information-Sharing Computer Network

Northrop Grumman Wins Contract for USAF Command and Control Modernization Program

TacSat-4 Enables Polar Region SatCom Experiment

'See Me' satellites may help ground forces

MISSILE DEFENSE
US Army reviews mental health diagnoses

Peru upgrades air defense with $140M plan

Ethical considerations of military-funded neuroscience

Northrop Grumman Signs Teaming Agreement With Persistent Surveillance Systems

MISSILE DEFENSE
Delhi boosts military spending 17 percent

Prison sentence for espionage scientist

Dassault says profit rises 10%, confident on fighter sales

Europe's armed forces team up on refuelling aircraft

MISSILE DEFENSE
Lavrov: Putin, Obama to meet in May

Ex-spy boss may spill Gadhafi's secrets

Outside View: A bodyguard of lies

US Marines set to arrive in Australia next month

MISSILE DEFENSE
3D-Printer with Nano-Precision

Nano spiral staircases modify light

Are silver nanoparticles harmful?

HyperSolar Discloses Development Plan for Breakthrough Renewable Hydrogen and Natural Gas Technology


Memory Foam Mattress Review

Newsletters :: SpaceDaily Express :: SpaceWar Express :: TerraDaily Express :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

.

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2012 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement