. Military Space News .
Defense Spending Strong Under Obama Administration

Obama plans to continue to prepare the military to "succeed in both conventional wars and in stabilization and counterinsurgency operations," says McDougall. His stance will likely require the Pentagon's defense budget to continue at or slightly above inflation in the near term, and overall spending will be higher when wartime requirements are included.
by Staff Writers
Newtown CT (SPX) Nov 18, 2008
The election of Democrat Barack Obama as the next American president has left onlookers questioning the future of U.S. defense spending. The Pentagon under the Bush administration witnessed unprecedented budget growth as a result of towering base budgets combined with hundreds of billions of dollars in supplemental wartime funding.

Given the government's growing deficit and the fragile state of the U.S. economy, these soaring budgets would have been deemed unaffordable no matter which party entered the White House.

"The tremendous spending increases of the last eight years therefore appear to have come to an end, though that is not to say that sweeping cuts are looming," said Shaun McDougall, Forecast International's North America Military Market analyst.

Having the biggest impact on topline spending in the near future will be the war in Iraq, as overall levels of defense spending will gradually decrease as violence declines and the pace of operations winds down.

"It should be noted, however, that the military will still require significant recapitalization funds to replace lost or damaged equipment even after combat troops are withdrawn," stated McDougall.

Obama will stand by this critical investment, though he will seek to end the days of supplemental spending bills by consolidating all defense appropriations. This move will provide improved oversight of wartime funds, and could put an end to some questionable procurement strategies.

Iraq demonstrated the unpreparedness of U.S. forces to sustain prolonged ground operations, as proven by extended deployments in the face of falling readiness levels across the board. In response to these shortfalls, Obama will continue a plan initiated by President George W. Bush to expand the Army and Marine Corps by a combined 92,000 members, which will require a substantial financial commitment in terms of both personnel costs and associated equipment.

The National Guard and Reserve forces have also been strained by the wars, and will require continued investment as they prepare to face future domestic and foreign challenges.

One should therefore not anticipate the same drawdown that came under President Bill Clinton following the fall of the Soviet Union. "The spending vacation of the 1990s has had a dramatic impact on today's military, one that the Pentagon is still struggling to recover from," McDougall states.

The Air Force's aircraft fleet continues to age, and the Navy's 280 deployable ships are not enough to support the service's maritime strategy. Obama says that the U.S. "must preserve [its] unparalleled airpower capabilities to deter and defeat any conventional competitors," and adds that he would support naval recapitalization by replacing aging ships and modernizing existing platforms.

Myriad national security threats around the world will also stave off potentially crippling budget cuts. The ability to wage full-spectrum warfare is essential when potential adversaries run the gamut from decentralized non-state actors to growing conventional powers.

Obama plans to continue to prepare the military to "succeed in both conventional wars and in stabilization and counterinsurgency operations," says McDougall. His stance will likely require the Pentagon's defense budget to continue at or slightly above inflation in the near term, and overall spending will be higher when wartime requirements are included.

This is not to say that the DoD will be impervious to today's fiscal constraints. Each of the Pentagon's programs will be assessed by the incoming administration, and indeed some will be reduced in scope or cut altogether.

Missile defense, the Airborne Laser, and the Army's Future Combat Systems will face the most scrutiny from an Obama administration early on, as will efforts to replace a deteriorating nuclear stockpile. Additional savings can also be expected through sorely needed acquisition reform, which Obama strongly supports.

Obama's priorities will be made more apparent upon his retooling of the U.S. National Security Strategy, and even more so following the release of the next Quadrennial Defense Review, which will provide a comprehensive long-term view into the administration's future defense plans.

"Despite a new party in the White House, the new strategic documents in many ways will contain more similarities with their predecessor's than differences," McDougall says. The Pentagon will face the same daunting challenges on Inauguration Day that it confronts now, and any administration would be hard-pressed not to maintain a healthy defense budget.

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Forecast International
The Military Industrial Complex at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Gadhafi Finds Lots Of Willing Sellers In Old Eastern Bloc
Moscow (UPI) Nov 17, 2008
Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi does not know Russian President Dmitry Medvedev very well, but in April 2008 Vladimir Putin, then Russian president, visited Libya to remove the main obstacle to the development of bilateral relations. He wrote off Libya's $4.5 billion debt to the former Soviet Union in return for its pledge to sign new contracts with Russia.







  • Analysis: Turkey, a land of paradoxes
  • Russia To Open Military Bases In Abkhazia, South Ossetia In 2009
  • Russia wants 'strategic partnership' with US: Medvedev
  • Outside View: Euro-Russian relations thaw

  • IAEA chief says atomic report on Syria 'not conclusive'
  • North Korea Remains Calm And Stable As Kim Wastes Away
  • Marshalls landowners could lose millions in US missile base row
  • Turkey could be good mediator with Iran: Erdogan

  • Spanish Army Conducts Successful NASAMS Live-Fire Exercise
  • Russia To Equip Five Brigades With Iskander Missile Systems By 2015
  • US denounces Iran missile test
  • Vandenberg Officials Launch Minuteman III Missile

  • France Says Countries Should Be Free To Decide On Missile Shield
  • Raytheon Awarded Development Cintract For BMD Multiple Kill Vehicle
  • BMD Watch: Russia may talk to Obama on BMD
  • US missile chief to Obama: anti-missile system 'is workable'

  • Two China airlines to get govt aid: state media
  • China's air show saw four bln dollars in deals: report
  • China plane-makers take first steps to rival global giants
  • Aviation giants look to China amid global turbulence

  • German Forces Test Stabilized Camera System For Mini-UAV
  • Honeywell Wins First Production Contract For T-Hawk Micro Air Vehicle
  • Aurora Wins USAF Contract On Vision-Based MAV Guidance
  • DCNS Achieves Automatic UAV Landing On Frigate

  • One day in Mosul: on IED patrol with US forces in Iraq
  • Iraq Deal Could End War
  • Iraqis want US troops out, but fear for the future
  • US pact holds pitfalls for Iraq's feuding factions: analysts

  • LockMart Receives Contract For Paveway II Laser Guided Bomb Kits
  • Outside View: Russian cops pack new heat
  • Kalashnikov turns 89, a 'happy man' for creating AK-47
  • TenCate Presents New Lightweight Composite Armour Solution

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement