. Military Space News .
"Dirty" Bomb A Credible Threat, But No Heavy Casualties

A convoy of two containers of nuclear waste leaves the Phillipsburg power plant 11 June 2001. During a stopover in Woerth, a second train from the Biblis power station will be added to th first one for transport to the French nuclear waste reprocessing plant La Hague. German government and executives from Germany's top energy firms are to sign a historic agreement 11 June 2001 to phase out nuclear energy in the country by 2018. EPA/AFP Photo by Uli Deck

 Washington (AFP) Mar 6, 2002
A "dirty" bomb made of discarded radiological material if exploded in downtown Washington or New York City would cause mass panic but not mass casualties, US nuclear officials and experts said Wednesday.

A "dirty" bomb, or a conventional explosive combined with radioactive material, is "not very effective as a means of causing fatalities," said Richard Meserve, chairman of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

"But it could have a psycho-social effect, and terrorists' greatest weapon is fear."

Top nuclear officials accompanying Meserve underlined that in the case of such an explosion entire city sections would have to be razed to the ground because of radiation contamination.

Concerns about terrorist attacks on the United States have soared since the devastating September 11 suicide strikes that left some 3,000 dead, particularly amid reports that the al-Qaeda network believed responsible for those attacks have been searching for nuclear materials on the black market.

"Today we know that radiological and nuclear attacks on the United States are not only possible, but there are enough screwballs out there willing to risk or even give their lives to use them," Senator Joe Biden said.

"Radiological attacks constitute a credible threat," confirmed Henry Kelly, president of the Federation of American Scientists, speaking to the Senate Foreign Relations committee that Biden chairs.

And "radioactive materials that could be used for such attacks are stored in thousands of facilities around the US," he said in prepared remarks.

Materials that could easily be stolen or lost from US research institutions "could contaminate tens of city blocks at a level that would require prompt evacuation and create terror in large communities" even if radiation casualties were low.

On the other hand, nuclear material that could be used to build nuclear weapons -- highly enriched uranium and plutonium -- is "very highly guarded," Meserve said.

The threat of a nuclear device was more likely to come from poorly protected fissile stockpiles abroad such as in Russia, he said. "This is an important challenge (and) the US should be engaged to ensure protection at the source."

US intelligence has reported that despite foreign assistance and its own efforts to heighten security, weapons grade nuclear material has gone missing from Russia, which Biden described as a "candy store for terrorists."

The single, most effective means of protecting the United States from these threats, Meserve said, is "to control materials at the source."

Los Alamos National Laboratory director Donald Cobb told the panel the United States was working with Russia to secure nuclear weapons and material, but acknowledged that the materials were the greatest danger.

"Nuclear weapons and weapon-usable materials tend to be focused in military applications under tight government oversight ... Radiological sources are more wide spread and have fewer controls."

But Kelly noted that the amount of radioactive sources discovered recently abandoned in North Carolina, or typically found in US food irradiation facilities or oil well logging systems would be enough to contaminate large swathes of a city, slightly increase cancer rates and force buildings to be demolished.

Related Links
SpaceDaily
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express

North Korea Accuses US Of Jeopardizing Nuclear Accord
Seoul (AFP) Mar 6, 2002
North Korea on Wednesday threatened to end a 1994 agreement to freeze its suspected nuclear weapons program, slamming what it called an "antagonistic" US attitude.







  • US Warned Not To Ignore Chinese Military Advances

  • "Dirty" Bomb A Credible Threat, But No Heavy Casualties
  • North Korea Accuses US Of Jeopardizing Nuclear Accord
  • US Satellite Pictures Upstage UN-Iraq Talks
  • New York Nuclear Bomb Scare Kept Secret For Months

  • Experts Fret Over China's Role In Weapons Proliferation
  • North Korea Expanding Missile Sales: US General
  • Iran Puts Off FM's Trip To Russia In Spat Over Meetings
  • Scud "Axis" An Alliance With Missiles But No Direction

  • Missiles In "Position" As India Mulls Further Action Against Pakistan
  • Abm Pullout: The Phonecall That Soured Putin's Year. Or Did It?
  • US Official Defends Plans for Missile Defense Despite Test Failure

  • Boeing Signs Technology Development Agreement With JAI For Work On Sonic Cruiser
  • Boeing Sonic Cruiser Completes First Wind Tunnel Tests

  • Northrop Grumman To Begin Initial Production Of Global Hawks
  • Aurora Flight Sciences To Help Tool Up For Global Hawk Production
  • Northrop Grumman Awarded $41.5 Million Global Hawk Contract
  • Boeing's Condit Downplays Prospects For Share In JSF Bounty





  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement