. Military Space News .
Dogs of War: PMC Research 101

The advent of e-mail and the Web changed that situation radically. If you Google "private military contractor," you receive more than 700,000 hits. Blackwater Worldwide alone will produce nearly 700,000 hits.
by David Isenberg
Washington (UPI) Feb 6, 2009
A common refrain from many who observe the private military contracting industry is that it is opaque, shadowy, veiled, secretive, hidden, non-transparent, etc. Is this true? Yes and no, but mostly no.

When I first started following this industry in the early 1990s, it really was difficult to get information on it. Partly that was because there were relatively few companies to follow. Three companies garnered most of what little coverage existed: Executive Outcomes of South Africa, Sandline of Great Britain and U.S.-based MPRI. And the first two were not particularly eager to answer press inquiries.

MPRI, whose not-so-modest motto back then was "the greatest corporate assemblage of military expertise in the world" because it was founded and run by relatively high-ranking retired U.S. military officers, escaped that pigeonhole thanks to the efforts of one of its vice presidents, whose openness and charm enabled MPRI to gain enormous publicity for its training efforts in the Balkan wars. But it was an anomaly back then.

And the relatively few substantial pieces of writing back then were still being published primarily on paper, hard to get hold of and not easy to disseminate.

The advent of e-mail and the Web changed that situation radically. If you Google "private military contractor," you receive more than 700,000 hits. Blackwater Worldwide alone will produce nearly 700,000 hits.

Of course, this has not all been for the better. One of the pitfalls of an online era is that anyone can be a publisher and voice one's thoughts on a subject, regardless of the facts.

And in at least one way, most private military companies do have an ace up their sleeve when it comes to protecting the details of their contracts from public scrutiny, namely that revealing them would constitute "a trade secret or privileged or confidential commercial or financial information" and thus should be exempt from disclosure. Just ask any reporter who has ever filed a Freedom of Information Act request for a private military or security contract to see what I mean. Although it bears saying that much, if not most, of the time, the reluctance to reveal the details belongs just as much to the client -- say, the U.S. government -- as it does the contractor.

But, increasingly, the veritable explosion of writing on the subject and the means to access it makes it increasingly easy to do substantive, quality research on the subject. Any college student, by virtue of online library access, can download articles from a wide variety of journals. If you want to know the impact of deploying civilian mariners with active-duty sailors aboard ship, see the article in Armed Forces & Society. How does the privatization of security in Africa fit into the context of globalization? See the article in International Relations journal.

But books and articles in print, you might say, are so 20th century. Good point. But other media also have useful resources. Just about any private military and security contractor has its own Web site. Yes, the information is often vague and banal, but if you dig a little, you can find useful details.

While hardly dispassionate or neutral sources of information, trade associations often have very useful information. See the Professional Services Council to get an idea of how private contractors fit into the ever-expanding government services sector. Or for details on companies working in Iraq, see the Private Security Company Association of Iraq. And the International Peace Operations Association, once you get past its use of euphemisms like the "Peace and Stability Industry," publishes a magazine that is a cut above the average trade group puffery.

While much of the television and movie coverage is terrible, there have been a few excellent productions, notably "Shadow Company" by Nick Bicanic and Jason Bourque and "Force Provision" by Allie Tyler.

There are also some quite excellent Web sites devoted to keeping tabs on what is being written. PrivateMilitary.org is one. Another is IraqSlogger.com. CorpWatch serves as a vigilant watchdog on many of the larger contractors.

Still, even the online medium has been largely static, in the sense that it is mostly people assembling news reporting or scholarly writing in one convenient place to download. While it is both necessary and valuable, up to now it has largely had a certain bloodless, theoretical quality to it. In other words, the people we most need to hear from, the operators themselves, have largely been silent.

In part, this is because operators routinely have to sign non-disclosure agreements as part of their contracts, which require them not to talk about their jobs.

Even so, there have long been places where contractors gather online to discuss the news of the day. These are sites like Danger Zone Jobs, Civilian Contractor Jobs, PrivateForces.com, Lightfighter.net and the International Contractors Association.

More recently we have sites that might be labeled PMC 2.0. These are sites run by former operators who bring unique insights into how the industry works, for better or worse. Their views can be acerbic, but their knowledge is immense.

Eeben Barlow, who founded Executive Outcomes, emerged from retirement last year with his own blog. As someone who has been through the PMC media meat grinder, his views are worth reading.

More recently, Jake Allen, a U.S. military veteran who has worked as a contractor in Iraq, founded the Combat Operator Web site for operators and security contractors. He also runs a podcast known as Combat Operator Radio, which is an innovation for PMC coverage.

The next time a congressional committee holds an oversight hearing, it should include these people as witnesses, not some self-promoting writer or film producer who has decided to use the industry as his road to fame and fortune.

(U.S. Navy veteran David Isenberg is a military affairs analyst. He is an adjunct scholar with the Cato Institute, a correspondent for Asia Times and the author of a new book, "Shadow Force: Private Security Contractors in Iraq." His "Dogs of War" column, analyzing developments in the private security and military sector, appears every Friday.)

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
The Military Industrial Complex at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Russia Defense Watch: Sukhois for Jakarta
Washington (UPI) Feb 5, 2009
Russia delivered the three aircraft on Dec. 26 and Jan. 17. Since then, the Sukhoi fighters were put together from their kits and have carried out test flights, RIA Novosti said. The aircraft were built and delivered for the relatively low cost of $300 million under a deal that was concluded in 2007, the report said. The Kremlin also has agreed to deliver a further three Sukhoi Su-27SKM fighters to Indonesia this year and next year, the report said. Russia's nuclear-powered guided missile battle cruiser Pyotr Veliky has been reinforcing the traditionally strong military ties between the Kremlin and India.







  • Obama team reaches out in first foreign outing
  • Russia's Ivanov welcomes new US overtures
  • France moves toward NATO return, in step with Germany
  • NATO chief criticises Russian security plan

  • SKorea to stand firm despite NKorea threats: president
  • Analysis: North Korea back to brinkmanship
  • US army chief tells NKorea to stop provocations
  • Iran awaits 'concrete offer' from US: speaker

  • Korean Tensions Flare As Kim Wastes Away
  • Iranian missiles have 'worldwide reach': Russia
  • Iran, NKorea missile moves no 'axis of evil' rerun: analysts
  • NKorea To Test Missile As US Vows Action

  • Down-Range Defensive Spread And The Promise Of KEIs Part Seven
  • The Multi Layered Partial Success ABM Solution Part Six
  • Ballistic Missile Proliferation Part Four
  • Russia missile plans dependent on US missile defence: ministry

  • Bank of China extends massive credit to state aircraft maker
  • Shanghai Airlines seeks capital injection
  • China Eastern may take three years to be profitable: chairman
  • First China-assembled Airbus set for May test flight: report

  • AeroVironment Awarded Contract Option For Raven UAV
  • AFRL Picks Industry Team As Phase II Integrator For Automated Aerial Refueling
  • Global Hawk UAV Sustainment Contract Issued
  • Russian Killer UAVs Could Target US Missile Bases

  • Analysis: Iraqi forces front and center
  • Dogs of War: That is the question
  • Four US soldiers killed in Iraq helicopter crash
  • Iraqi PM says US troops could pull out before deadline

  • ManTech Wins Contract To Support MRAPs In Southwest Asia
  • Metal Storm Achieves Man-Firing Milestone
  • White Sands Testing New Laser Weapon System
  • UEWR In Greenland Achieves Satellite Tracking In Record Time

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement