. Military Space News .
Ex-defence minister joins Britain's Afghan resource row

US must show progress in Afghan war by next summer: Gates
US Defense Secretary Robert Gates said, in a newspaper interview published Sunday, that US-led forces in Afghanistan must show progress by next summer to avoid the public perception that the conflict has become unwinnable. Gates told The Los Angeles Times that victory in that country was a "long-term prospect" under any scenario and that the United States would not win the war in one year. However, US forces must begin to turn the situation around in a year, he said, or face the likely loss of public support, The Times reported. "After the Iraq experience, nobody is prepared to have a long slog where it is not apparent we are making headway," Gates is quoted as saying in the interview. "The troops are tired; the American people are pretty tired." Gates gave the interview aboard his plane as he returned to Washington after visiting sailors Friday at the Great Lakes Naval Station in Illinois, the paper said. Gates has spoken in the past about the need for progress in Afghanistan and the public's fatigue of war, The Times said. But in the interview, he went further by offering a more specific time frame for needed progress as well as the consequences of failing to meet it, the report said. The United States has sent 21,000 additional troops to Afghanistan and chosen a new commander to lead the international effort. "This is where we are really getting back into the fight," Gates is quoted as telling the paper. Photo courtesy AFP.
by Staff Writers
London (AFP) July 18, 2009
Britain's recently-resigned defence secretary added his voice Saturday to calls for more support for troops in Afghanistan, as mounting casualties there pile the pressure on Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

John Hutton, who quit his post for family reasons six weeks ago, wrote in an article to appear in The Sunday Telegraph that the government had the right strategy in Afghanistan but said "more logistical support" was needed.

Since eight British soldiers were killed within 24 hours in Afghanistan last week, Brown has faced criticism from the main opposition Conservatives that his government is denying troops vital resources.

Senior military figures including army chief General Richard Dannatt have called for more troops and equipment for the seven-year-old conflict, which was stepped up last month with a new push against Talbian insurgents.

Hutton said the government was right to try to stabilise Afghanistan and defeat those offering a haven to Al-Qaeda through the military offensive, which aims to clear and hold areas of the volatile southern province of Helmand.

But he wrote: "It is going to take more resources to properly execute... It is clear we need more logistical support to reduce the risk of as much of the troop movements and supply effort as possible."

Following criticism last week by lawmakers that a lack of helicopters was having "adverse consequences" for the campaign, Hutton said ministers were right to try to make more helicopters available more quickly.

"I am sure that urgent discussions are also taking place about whether more troops are needed to improve our ground-holding capabilities and protection from roadside bombs," he said.

"The mood on the ground is unequivocal -- more resources in each of these areas would be helpful."

The recent loss of life has pushed the Afghan conflict to the top of the political agenda ahead of a general election which must be held by June 2010.

A new opinion poll for The Sunday Times put David Cameron's Conservatives on 42 per cent support, up two since last month, compared to 25 percent for Brown's Labour party, up one.

The YouGov poll of 1,956 voters July 16-17 put the centrist Liberal Democrats unchanged at 18 percent.

Sixty percent of those questioned agreed that Brown was trying to fight the war in Afghanistan "on the cheap," while just 20 percent said he was doing his best to provide the equipment the troops required.

earlier related report
British army chief piles pressure on PM over Afghanistan
The head of Britain's army called for more troops and equipment in Afghanistan Friday, piling pressure on Prime Minister Gordon Brown over Britain's contribution to the war amid a surge in deaths.

General Richard Dannatt's latest intervention came after days of accusations that Brown's government is not supporting the forces enough. The government insists that the Afghanistan force has all it needs.

Dannatt added that cutting back the number of British troops in Afghanistan after next month's presidential elections from 9,000 to the previous level of 8,300 would be "the wrong thing to do".

Brown has been on the spot over Afghanistan since last week when its soldiers there suffered their blackest period yet, with eight dying within 24 hours.

Another British soldier died Thursday while on foot patrol in the southern Helmand province, the Ministry of Defence said, taking the figure to 16 this month.

Speaking on his last trip to Afghanistan before his retirement next month, Dannatt told BBC radio that he had a "shopping list" of equipment that he would take back to ministers in London.

He wants more focus on tackling the use of roadside bombs or improvised explosive devices (IEDs) which have killed many of the troops who have died recently.

Dannatt also said there could be a case for a temporary boost to troops in the south but reiterated that while extra "boots on the ground" were needed, they could be British, American or Afghan.

"There may well be a case for what I would call a short term uplift... for about 12 to 18 months until the Afghan National Army can get the right strength down here," he said.

"It would be the right thing for us in the short-term for us to stay at 9,000, down to 8,300 would be wrong, militarily I'm quite sure about that... I couldn't sign up to that now".

Dannatt's comments seem to throw into question Brown's claim Thursday before a House of Commons committee that: "For what we're doing in Afghanistan we've provided the resources and equipment that are necessary... we will do whatever is necessary and what is right to equip our armed forces."

During the session, Brown repeatedly sidestepped questions on a newspaper report that the head of the armed forces had asked for 2,000 extra troops for Afghanistan but received only 700.

The main opposition Conservatives, who hope to oust Brown in elections next year, have repeatedly claimed that British deaths could be prevented if more troops were transported in helicopters rather than by road.

Their defence spokesman Liam Fox told BBC radio: "If we had a direct request from the head of the armed forces that they needed something specific... of course we would have to say yes to that".

It was revealed this week that Dannatt was ferried around by a US Black Hawk helicopter on his visit to Afghanistan. Foreign Secretary David Miliband insisted this was "normal" pooling of NATO resources.

Dannatt, known for his plain-speaking style, is due to retire next month and reports suggest he is poised to write a book critical of the British government's role in Afghanistan.

But he was unapologetic about his comments when asked if he felt he was fighting a war on two fronts -- in Afghanistan and with ministers in London -- in Friday's interview.

"I think some issues should be aired so they can be debated and I'm unapologetic as far as I'm concerned. If some think I've crossed the line, so be it."

Thursday saw the funeral of the highest-ranking British officer to die in action since the Falklands War in 1982, Lieutenant Colonel Rupert Thorneloe, who was killed in Afghanistan.

The British death toll for the war is now 185, higher than for the Iraq war.

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
News From Across The Stans



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Dialogue only way forward for Pakistan, India: Gilani
Islamabad (AFP) July 18, 2009
Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani Saturday said that dialogue with India was the only way forward for the nuclear-armed rivals if they want to beat the militants. "If we do not go for dialogue that means that we strengthen terrorism," Gilani told a press conference in Islamabad he had called to brief the media about his meeting this week with Indian premier Manmohan Singh. ... read more







The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2009 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement