. | . |
France in NATO: What would de Gaulle say?
Paris (AFP) Feb 22, 2009 A betrayal of General de Gaulle's independent foreign policy, or a timely rejection of knee-jerk anti-Americanism? France's imminent return to NATO's command structure has triggered fierce debate. While the move will make little difference on the battlefield -- French forces have long played a key role in NATO missions from Afghanistan to the Balkans -- its symbolic quality has ruffled France's political class. President Nicolas Sarkozy has made it clear that he will confirm France's formal return to NATO's military command before the Alliance's summit in Strasbourg and Kehl on the Franco-German border on April 4. According to some critics, the nominally Gaullist Sarkozy is turning his back on a proud legacy created by President Charles de Gaulle in 1966, when France left NATO in order to establish a proper distance from Washington. Others argue that a nuclear-armed France is already a de facto pillar of the alliance and would have more influence on policy from within NATO's chain of command than it has simply sitting on its political councils. "This has gone beyond a rational debate, we are caught up in symbolism," warned Yves Boyer, from the Strategic Research Foundation. More than 40 years after De Gaulle's decision, Sarkozy's change of tack has been attacked by his left-wing opposition, which sees a threat to France's perceived role as a western counterbalance to Washington's power. "We are America's ally, not its vassal. We're going to end up with a quite different political reality as regards our ties with a lot of other countries," former Socialist prime minister Laurent Fabius argued. Another Socialist lawmaker, Jean-Michel Boucheron, warned France would become a "second-class Britain" and Sarkozy's former presidential election rival Segolene Royal saw the move as "France retreating into the West." Even on the right, within a Gaullist movement that chose Sarkozy as its champion not without reserves, there is widespread hostility towards his plan to jettison this key element of the General's legacy. Former prime minister Dominique de Villepin, best known outside France for his impassioned attack at the United Nations on US plans to invade Iraq, said it would be a mistake to reduce France's room for manoeuvre. "To underline our attachment to the Western bloc at a moment when the West is no longer the only player, far from it, and the countries of the South are rising, is a strategic and presentational mistake," he said. "Leaning East, reaching out to the South, always looking for solutions that others can't find -- that's France's role," he told Canal Plus television. "It's true that for now NATO decisions must be unanimous but I went through the Iraqi crisis and I know the pressure the Americans bring to bear when they think their own security is at stake is very hard to resist." Sarkozy's supporters argue he is both acknowledging the post Cold War reality of France's western alignment and taking an opportunity to strengthen France's role in defining any future common European defence policy. "In 1966, General De Gaulle's decision was tied to the birth of France's independent nuclear deterrent," argued Pierre Lellouche, a right-wing lawmaker and former chairman of NATO's committee of parliamentarians. "We were in an Alliance where forces were to be engaged automatically in the event of a Soviet attack. We had a problem with combining automatic decision making with a finger on the nuclear trigger," he explained. "Today, we're not in the same situation. Whether to take part or not in NATO missions, often with a mandate from the United Nations, is a sovereign decision for member states," he argued. At least one Gaullist has been won over -- former prime minister Alain Juppe wrote in Le Monde that "a return to NATO would not be a sacrilege" even if he admitted "no-one can say what De Gaulle would have said today." Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
Analysis: What Germany is all about today Berlin (UPI) Feb 17, 2009 Germany is a Big Brother state; Germany is detaining intellectuals for no reason; Germany let an innocent man rot in Guantanamo -- those are three of 13 directors' opinions included in a film compilation that aims to dissect what Germany in 2009 is all about. |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |