. Military Space News .
THE STANS
Gates, Petraeus differ on flexibility of Afghan exit

White House says Afghan deadline 'non-negotiable'
Milwaukee, Wisconsin (AFP) Aug 16, 2010 - The White House said Monday that July 2011 was a "non-negotiable" deadline for starting a US withdrawal from Afghanistan, while insisting that President Barack Obama and his top general in Kabul were on the same page. The White House was quizzed about a seeming disconnect between the two after General David Petraeus said in an interview aired Sunday that he could seek a delay in the troop drawdown if conditions on the ground required it. "I think the president has been quite clear in explaining that it's a process, not an event, and that it's conditions-based," he told NBC television's "Meet the Press" program.

"The president and I sat down in the Oval Office and he expressed very clearly that what he wants from me is my best professional military advice." But White House spokesman Bill Burton, speaking to reporters traveling on Obama's plane to Milwaukee, said the general's remarks had been taken out of context. "I think that that is a very thinly sliced parsing of what he had to say. He said very specifically that that deadline stands and there is no daylight between the president or his commanders on the ground when it comes to July 2011," Burton said. "As you saw with Iraq, when the president makes a commitment, he keeps it. And he intends to do that here as well," he said.

"Obviously the scope and rate of withdrawal will be conditions-based, but the date is not negotiable," Burton added. US Defense Secretary Robert Gates told the Los Angeles Times in an interview, "There is no question in anybody's mind that we are going to begin drawing down troops in July of 2011." The deadline has come under fire from some Republicans who say it emboldens the Taliban by sending a message that the United States is not in the fight in Afghanistan for the long-term. But others defend the deadline, which Obama coupled with a 30,000 troop surge, as needed to press Afghan leaders to move more quickly to assume responsibility for security in the country.
by Staff Writers
Washington (AFP) Aug 16, 2010
US Defense Secretary Robert Gates insisted Monday the July 2011 date to start withdrawing American troops from Afghanistan was set in stone, putting him at odds with his top Afghan war commander.

Gates and General David Petraeus were in lock-step on the need for a gradual withdrawal, but a series of interviews exposed discord over the flexibility of the start date given last November by US President Barack Obama.

"There is no question in anybody's mind that we are going to begin drawing down troops in July of 2011," Gates told The Los Angeles Times.

But Petraeus, asked in a separate interview whether he could reach that juncture and have to recommend a delay to Obama because of the conditions on the ground, replied: "Certainly, yeah.

"I think the president has been quite clear in explaining that it's a process, not an event, and that it's conditions-based," he told NBC television's "Meet the Press" program on Sunday.

"The president and I sat down in the Oval Office and he expressed very clearly that what he wants from me is my best professional military advice."

Afghanistan, with the help of its Western backers, is trying to build up its army and police so that they can take responsibility for security from US-led NATO forces by the end of 2014.

The Taliban, toppled in a 2001 US-led invasion, still control large swathes of the south and have put up stiff resistance to a surge of 30,000 more US troops due to swell American numbers to 100,000 in the coming weeks.

US public support for the near nine-year war and Obama's handling of it are at an all-time low, according to opinion polls here, while the death toll for American troops hit a record monthly high in July of 66.

Both Gates, in the LA Times, and Petraeus, in a series of interviews with NBC, The New York Times and The Washington Post, sought to reassure a skeptical public that the American-led coalition can succeed in its aims.

Petraeus told The New York Times he did not just want to preside over a "graceful exit," while Gates suggested some security responsibilities could begin to be transferred to Afghan forces as early as early next year.

Obama's mid-2011 deadline to begin a limited withdrawal has been strongly criticized by some who believe it sent out the message America is not in the fight for the long-term and boosted the Taliban's resolve to wait it out.

Others attack him for not pulling out troops fast enough as they believe US and NATO forces are bogged down in an unwinnable conflict.

Petraeus, giving his first major interviews since assuming command of more than 140,000 coalition troops in Afghanistan last month, also said he would be prepared to negotiate with Taliban with "blood on their hands."

The general, who helped turn around the Iraq war for Obama's predecessor, George W. Bush -- partly by wheeling and dealing with warring factions -- said a new reconciliation and reintegration strategy aimed at persuading Afghan insurgents to change sides was "fairly imminent."

There is "every possibility, I think, that there can be low- and mid-level reintegration and indeed some fracturing of the senior leadership that could be really defined as reconciliation."

In his interview with The Washington Post, Petraeus said 365 insurgent leaders and 2,400 rank-and-file fighters have been killed or captured over the past three months.

The operations have led "some leaders of some elements" of the insurgency to begin reconciliation discussions with the Afghan government, he told the newspaper, characterizing the interactions as "meaningful."

Petraeus formally took over command of the Afghan war in July after Obama dismissed General Stanley McChrystal after he and his staff made disparaging comments about senior US administration figures.

The interviews came hours before the icasualties.org website announced that the total number of foreign troops killed since the start of the Afghan war in 2001 had topped 2,000, including 1,226 Americans and 331 from Britain.

Last week, the United Nations said the number of civilian casualties in the Afghan war had risen sharply in the first six months of this year to reach 1,271 Afghans. Another 1,997 people were wounded.

The Taliban called late Sunday for a committee to "conduct investigations into the civilian casualties across the country."



Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
News From Across The Stans



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


THE STANS
Foreign troop deaths in Afghan war 'top 2,000'
Kabul (AFP) Aug 16, 2010
The death toll for foreign troops in Afghanistan has reached another grim milestone, with the number killed since the war began nine years ago topping 2,000, according to the icasualties.org website. In all, 2,002 members of the international forces have been killed since the US-led invasion in 2001, including 1,226 Americans, 331 from Britain and 445 from other nations making up the coaliti ... read more







THE STANS
Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle Plays Key Role In Latest Missile Defense Test

US plans missile interceptor sale to Kuwait

S.Korea conducts anti-missile training amid N.Korean warning

Japan considers exporting SM-3 missiles

THE STANS
Major Component Design Reviews On Joint Air-To-Ground Missile Program

Missiles deployed in Abkhazia two years ago: Kremlin source

LockMart Receives Contract From NAVAIR To Support Tactical Tomahawk Weapons Control System

Russian missile deployment 'extremely dangerous': Georgia

THE STANS
US drone strike kills 13 in Pakistan

India gets reassurance over Predator sale

Australia does deal for RQ-7B Shadow UAVs

Elbit Systems Launches Two New Robots

THE STANS
USAF Launches First AEHF Satellite

Persistent Wireless Broadband Communications Network For The Battlefield

Mexican navy aircraft to use Telephonics

Raytheon's ASTOR Saving Lives In The Counterinsurgency Battle

THE STANS
Army Approves Safer Explosive To Replace TNT

BCTM Increment One Test Results Demo Substantial Improvement

Hypersonic ATACMS Motor Boosts Experimental Scramjet In First Flight

LockMart Demonstrates New Launching System For Active Missile Decoys

THE STANS
Russia passes on munitions pact

Britain to slim down defence backroom operations

South African air force's woes

Israel to buy world's most advanced warplane

THE STANS
China overshadows Japan economy as growth slows

Australia not 'starry-eyed' on China, focus on India

Outside View: China syndrome

Outside View: What's in a name?

THE STANS
Truck-borne laser weapon to be on way soon

Maritime Laser Demonstration System Proves Key Capabilities For Shipboard Operations

Phalanx Sensors Used In Laser Shoot Down Of Airborne Targets

Boeing Accepts Delivery Of Key Component For US Army's HEL TD


The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement