. Military Space News .
Gates in Afghanistan, commander says more troops needed

File image courtesy AFP.

NATO commader tightens procedures on use of lethal force
The commander of NATO-led forces in Afghanistan said Tuesday he issued a revised directive on the use of lethal force following an air strike last month in which scores of civilians were reported killed. General David McKiernan, the commander of the International Security Assistance Force, said he issued the directive September 2 that for the most part re-emphasised rules and procedures on the use of force. "We have received and continue to review our procedures for the application of lethal force, and I've issued a just revised tactical directive that tries to be very measured in how we apply lethal force," he said.

"Probably 90 percent of it is a reemphasis of procedures we already have in place," he said. McKiernan said the aim was to further reduce civilian casualties, but he emphasised that in a counter-insurgency campaign in which insurgents hide among the population some civilian casualties were unavoidable. Afghan and UN officials charged that 90 civilians, many of them women and children, were killed in an August 22 air strike on a compound in western Afghanistan after a firefight involving US and Afghan security forces. A US military investigation found that only five to seven civilians were killed in the attack, along with 30 insurgents, but McKiernan asked for a review of the investigation after cellphone video footage came to light that called into question the US probe.

ISAF troops and a separate US-led coalition backed by Afghan forces are fighting an increasingly bloody insurgency from Taliban and suspected Al-Qaeda militants in the war-weary country. McKiernan said he expected the review of the investigation, conducted by a general assigned by the US Central Command, to conclude in a couple of weeks. "We have very, very measured procedures that we use when we drop any kind of ordnance from the air whether its bombers, whether its Ac-130 gunships. "We have certain constraints on collateral damage that are reviewed before ordnance is delivered. We have positive identification of the target. We have procedures for control on the ground of the target," he said.

"But I'll tell you this is something we can't be accurate with all the time," he added. "There are times there are going to be unintended consequences on the civilian population." McKiernan spoke to reporters before meeting with US Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who arrived here Tuesday from Iraq. Geoff Morrell, the Pentagon press secretary, told reporters that Gates wanted a first hand look at the problems associated with close air support during his visit.

by Staff Writers
Kabul (AFP) Sept 16, 2008
The top US commander in Afghanistan said Tuesday he needed more than 10,000 combat troops to fight the insurgency, in addition to those committed last week by US President George W. Bush.

David McKiernan, the highest-ranking US general here and commander of the NATO-led force, made the comments to reporters, as he met with US Defense Secretary Robert Gates in the Afghan capital.

The appeal for more troops comes in response to what commanders say is an intensifying Taliban and suspected Al-Qaeda insurgency in Afghanistan and calls for a new strategy that deals with their safe havens in Pakistan.

While Gates met over dinner with McKiernan, the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Michael Mullen, travelled to Pakistan for talks.

McKiernan told reporters that, while the insurgents were not winning, "It's going to take a while to defeat this insurgency."

The general said he required at least three more combat brigades and support forces on top of the combat brigade that Bush announced would be diverted from Iraq to Afghanistan in January.

He said an estimate of 10,000 more troops was "probably on the low side."

"When I first got here I said that would be a good, valid requirement. Plus I also asked for immediate forces right now because our fight in the east is sharper than predicted some months ago. It's a tougher fight."

Currently, there are about 33,000 US troops in Afghanistan.

Without additional ground forces, he said, "the danger is we'll be here longer and we'll expend more resources and experience more human suffering than if we have more resources sooner."

McKiernan said violent attacks have gone up 30 percent over the last year and that the insurgents have adapted their tactics.

The general attributed the rising violence to a coalescing of insurgent forces, a move by NATO forces into new areas, and turmoil in Pakistan that has strengthened the militants.

Asked whether the safe havens in Pakistan was the biggest factor driving the insurgency, McKiernan demurred but said, "It's probably the hardest one to get at."

He said the requirement for three more combat brigades had been accepted in Washington. "So it's not a question of if but when."

"I don't like to use the word surge for Afghanistan because I think what we need are increased capabilities on a sustained basis, not a temporary basis."

In addition to troops, more intelligence, reconnaissance and surveillance assets were needed, including signal intelligence, overhead imagery and full motion video beamed down from surveillance platforms.

Gates has pressed to get more surveillance assets to Afghanistan and Iraq, and officials said he would be shown existing capabilities during his visit here.

Gates also wanted a first hand account of the use of close air support, a source of intense friction with the Afghan government and public in the wake of a series of high profile incidents in which civilians were killed.

In the worst such case, Afghan and UN officials have charged that 90 civilians, including many women and children, were killed August 22 in an air strike in western Iraq after a firefight involving US and Afghan troops.

McKiernan told reporters that he issued a directive September 2 tightening and re-emphasizing the procedures and rules on the use of lethal force.

"We have revised and continue to review our procedures for the application of lethal force, and I've issued a just revised tactical directive that tries to be very measured in how we apply lethal force," he said.

"Probably ninety percent of it is a reemphasis of procedures we already have in place," he said.

A US military investigation found that only five to seven civilians were killed in the attack, along with 30 insurgents, but McKiernan asked for a review of the investigation after cellphone imagery came to light that called its conclusions into question.

McKiernan said the aim of the revised directive was to reduce further casualties, but he emphasized that in a counter-insurgency campaign in which insurgents hide among the populace some civilian casualties were unavoidable.

earlier related report
US military chief makes unannounced visit to Pakistan
Chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, Admiral Michael Mullen, arrived in Pakistan on an unannounced visit Tuesday to discuss operations underway on the Afghanistan frontier with Pakistan's leaders, the Pentagon said.

"He will meet with Prime Minister (Yousuf Raza) Gilani and General (Ashfaq) Kayani to discuss ongoing operations in the border region with Afghanistan," the office of the Joint Chiefs told AFP, without elaborating.

The visit comes against a backdrop of tension between the two allies. Islamabad has vowed to defend itself against violations of its air space and incursions by US forces in Afghanistan, after a series of missile strikes blamed on US-led coalition forces left 38 people dead in Pakistan.

The Pentagon on Monday denied that US-led coalition helicopters based in Afghanistan were fired on in Pakistan and forced to turn back.

The incident "did not happen," said Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman, adding that after studying the facts, a statement by a Pakistani security official "didn't appear to be accurate."

Earlier there were conflicting reports that shots were fired when US-led coalition helicopters based in Afghanistan neared the border with Pakistan.

The gunfire was said to have broken out late Sunday about 100 meters (yards) from the South Waziristan tribal area, where Al-Qaeda and Taliban fighters are believed to be sheltering. There were no casualties.

"The US-led coalition troops in helicopters came close to the border and they tried to sneak into Pakistan territory but shots were fired by Pakistani troops and the coalition troops retreated," a Pakistani security official said.

But Whitman said in Washington: "I can't find any mission that correlates to the reports I saw."

"I can't find any report about helicopters being fired upon," he added.

The incident was also denied by Pakistan army's chief military spokesman, Major General Athar Abbas. "These reports are not correct," he said.

US Defense Secretary Robert Gates, meanwhile, arrived Tuesday to the Afghan capital for talks with coalition force commanders and President Hamid Karzai amid increasing concern about the Taliban insurgency.

Recent alleged US incursions into the area that have raised alarm in Pakistan have been welcomed by Afghanistan, which has for years said that more attention should be paid to extremist sanctuaries across the border.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
News From Across The Stans



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Shots fired as US-led troops near Pakistani border: officials
Peshawar, Pakistan (AFP) Sept 15, 2008
Shots were fired when US-led coalition helicopters based in Afghanistan neared the border with Pakistan, officials said Monday, but there were conflicting accounts of the incident.







  • Russian Fleet May Go To Mediterranean
  • Analysis: West vs. Russia, no end in sight
  • China says more talks set with India on border row
  • NATO Blocked In The Caucusus Part Two

  • Iran warns on nuclear cooperation, rattles sabre over Gulf
  • North Korea vows to build up 'war deterrent'
  • Iran Stalls On IAEA Nuke Probe US Threatens More Sanctions
  • India now a big world player thanks to nuclear nod: minister

  • NKorea conducts engine tests at new missile site: report
  • US Navy's New Submarine Class Conducts Tomahawk Cruise Missile Launches
  • NZ Navy And Air Force Test Fire Missile
  • US Navy Conducts Second Test Of Raytheon's Standard Missile-6

  • Pentagon proposes sale of missile defense system to UAE
  • Russian Blackjacks In Venezuela End Yankee Hegemony: Chavez
  • Lavrov accuses US of trying to encircle Russia with shield
  • Obama says missile shield cannot target Russia: Poland's Sikorski

  • Safer Skies For The Flying Public
  • Chinese airlines fly into headwinds in Olympic year
  • The M2-F1 - An Aircraft Without Wings
  • China's Tianjin building runway for Airbus test flights: report

  • QinetiQ Rolls Out Field-Transformable Dragon Runner SUGV
  • US drones bring fear and firepower to Qaeda war in Pakistan
  • Russian Army Adopts New Reconnaissance Drones
  • Virtual Reality Project Could Improve UAV Operations

  • Odierno warns on Iraq security as he takes US command
  • Odierno: towering US general charged with Iraq 'end-game'
  • Gates honours US leaders in Iraq as female bomber kills 22
  • Iraq close to security agreement with US: foreign minister

  • First Run Of Boeing Laser JDAM Demonstrated On B-52H
  • Boeing Awarded Contract For Radar Upgrade On Saudi AWACS Fleet
  • US to sell bunker-busting bombs to Israel: Pentagon
  • Eurofighter Typhoon Flight Milestone: 50,000 Hours And Climbing

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement