. Military Space News .
Immunity for private guards in Iraq a sticking point: US

by Staff Writers
Baghdad (AFP) June 10, 2008
Immunity from Iraqi law for foreign private guards is a sticking point in the deal between Washington and Baghdad over long-term US troop presence in the country, a top US official said Tuesday.

"The issue of contractors including (foreign) security contractors is a sensitive one, is a significant one," David Satterfield, the US State Department's top Iraq adviser told reporters in Baghdad's heavily fortified Green Zone.

"There are outstanding issues, obviously, including issues focused on the security side."

The presence of tens of thousands of foreign private security contractors has been heavily criticised, especially after last year's brutal massacre of 17 Iraqis in Baghdad by Blackwater company which offers protection to US officials in Iraq.

These contractors, however, enjoy immunity from Iraqi law. The contract of Blackwater was also recently renewed for another year.

Negotiations for a long-term US military presence in Iraq come amid strong criticism from Baghdad and former foe turned friend Tehran over the details of the deal which aims to maintain American soldiers in the country beyond 2008.

Iraqi media reports have suggested the United States is seeking to keep as many as 50 military bases indefinitely in Iraq, control the nation's air space, and grant its troops and foreign private contractors continuing immunity from prosecution under Iraqi law.

American diplomats and military officials have vehemently denied that Washington wants to create "permanent" bases and insist that the pact is no threat to any of Iraq's neighbours including Iran, the US's arch enemy.

"We will do nothing in these negotiations that in any way could harm or weaken the Iraqi government. We will do nothing in these negotiations that is not ultimately fully transparent," insisted Satterfield.

"(The negotiatons) are not based upon pressure, they are not negotiations based upon dictate by the United States, there are no demands in these negotiations. They are discussions designed to produce a meaningful partnership."

Iraqi politicians -- supporters and opponents of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki -- are unconvinced, and have expressed fear that Iraqi sovereignty could be compromised under such a framework.

Iraq went so far last week as to say it had a "different vision" from the US on the issue, while Maliki on his official three-day visit to Tehran that ended Monday also sought to reassure the leaders of majority Shiite Iran.

"We will not allow Iraq to become a platform for harming the security of Iran and neighbours," Maliki said in Tehran.

But Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei told Maliki that the continued presence of US troops was Iraq's "fundamental problem."

US President George W. Bush and Maliki agreed in principle last November to sign a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) by the end of July.

More than five years after the March 2003 invasion of Iraq, there are still around 150,000 US troops deployed in Iraq, even after the ongoing drawdown of the additional personnel sent out under the controversial surge policy announced in February last year.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Iraq: The first technology war of the 21st century



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Gates looks to smooth wartime political transition
Washington (AFP) June 10, 2008
US Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Tuesday he is looking for ways to engineer the first political transition in wartime in 40 years without crippling gaps in key Pentagon posts.







  • Analysis: Euro 2008 and security
  • Walker's World: Bush's Europe problem
  • Outside View: Russia's new top general
  • US Envoy Would Like To See Russia As NATO Member

  • Bush: Nuclear-armed Iran would be 'incredibly dangerous'
  • Gates warns states against giving terrorists nuclear bomb
  • Gates tells air force 'no room for error' in nuclear mission
  • Iran vows 'painful' response to any Israeli attack

  • Analysis: Missiles aimed at Taiwan
  • Lockheed Martin Receives 90 Million Dollar MLRS Launcher Contract
  • RBS15 Mk3 Successfully Fired
  • India tests ballistic missile: official

  • Poland would let Russia inspect missile site: report
  • BMD Focus: Poland blocks base -- Part 1
  • Aegis Destroys Ballistic Missile In Terminal Phase
  • Raytheon Standard Missile-2 Intercept Shows Near-Term, Sea-Based Terminal Capability

  • China's new jumbo-jet firm no threat to Airbus, Boeing: state media
  • China unveils new jumbo jet company: report
  • NASA And JAXA To Conduct Joint Research On Sonic Boom Modeling
  • Analysis: Can airplanes go green?

  • Predator, Reaper Unit Becomes Air Expeditionary Wing
  • UK Defence Committee Enquiry Into ISTAR And Role Of UAVs
  • Boeing Awarded Navy Contract For ScanEagle Services
  • War Zone Demand Assures Steady Growth For US Unmanned Aviation Systems Market

  • Gates looks to smooth wartime political transition
  • Immunity for private guards in Iraq a sticking point: US
  • Iran leader warns Iraq PM over US troops
  • Future US forces in Iraq don't threaten Iran: Pentagon

  • B-2 Accident Report Released
  • They Only Have Eyes For U-2
  • Electronic Binoculars That Use Brain Activity To Detect Threats
  • QinetiQ North America Ships First MAARS Robot

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement