. Military Space News .
India nuclear deal could trigger arms race: US lawmakers

by Staff Writers
Washington (AFP) Aug 20, 2008
A nuclear energy deal between the United States and India could fuel an arms race with Pakistan unless it is amended to ensure New Delhi is banned from producing new weapons-grade material and from conducting nuclear test explosions, two US lawmakers said Wednesday.

The two lawmakers called on the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group to insist on amending the agreement when it meets to consider the deal on Thursday in Vienna.

Objections by any nation in the group -- which controls the global flow of civilian atomic exports -- would scuttle the pact.

The nuclear energy pact "threatens to rapidly accelerate New Delhi's arms race with Pakistan -- a rivalry made all the more precarious by the resignation on Tuesday of the Pakistani president, Pervez Musharraf," Democrats Edward Markey and Ellen Tauscher wrote in a commentary published in the New York Times.

"This deal was foolish when Pakistan was relatively stable; with Mr. Musharraf gone, an arms race on the subcontinent would likely be more difficult to control."

The suppliers group "can say yes to nuclear trade with India if two simple conditions are met," wrote the two members of the House of Representatives.

"First, India must sign the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, a step already taken by 178 other countries and every member state of the Nuclear Suppliers Group," the commentary said.

"Second, India must agree to halt production of nuclear material for weapons."

Such a ban would not require India to give up the atomic weapons it has or prevent it from building more weapons with nuclear material previously produced, according to the lawmakers.

By shutting down the manufacture of new plutonium and highly enriched uranium, India "would prove to the international community that opening up nuclear commerce would not assist, either directly or indirectly, its nuclear weapons program.

Markey, from Massachusetts, is co-chairman of the House Bipartisan Task Force on Nonproliferation and Tauscher, from California, is chair of the House Strategic Forces Subcommittee.)

President George W. Bush and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh agreed a framework for the nuclear deal in 2005, under which the United States will provide energy-starved India civilian nuclear fuel and technology.

India still needs a waiver from the Nuclear Suppliers Group and ratification by the US Congress before the deal can go through.

The United States and other developed states suspended nuclear trade with India after New Delhi fired its first nuclear weapons test in 1974, and the new deal is part of a strategic partnership between the world's two biggest democracies.

The commentary said the Nuclear Suppliers Group was formed in response to India's illegal 1974 nuclear test and that it would be undermining its mission if it approved the deal as written.

If the group agrees to the deal as is and breaches its own rules, "countries such as Iran and North Korea would certainly use the precedent to their advantage."

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Atlantic Eye: Lost lessons of the Cold War
Prague, Czech Republic (UPI) Aug 19, 2008
Once the West stood tall against the great Bear. NATO vs. the Warsaw Pact. More than 1 million U.S. and Soviet troops faced each other in a divided Germany. Then communism fell. The Bush administration has forgotten all the United States learned and knew since.







  • NATO Dithering On Many Battlefields
  • US: Venezuela's Russia fleet invite is 'curious'
  • Russia moves SS-21 missiles into Georgia: US defense official
  • Tougher Russia could complicate UN work

  • Iran to continue 'positive' nuclear talks with IAEA
  • India nuclear deal could trigger arms race: US lawmakers
  • Atlantic Eye: Lost lessons of the Cold War
  • Strategic Lessons In Failure Part Three

  • US missile deal gives Poland Patriots, bolstered defence ties
  • Thales Successful In ESSM Live Firing Test
  • Missile Successfully Launches From Vandenberg
  • Indian Army Orders Additional BrahMos Cruise Missiles

  • Russia says Europe in new arms race
  • US, Poland sign missile shield deal amid Russian opposition
  • Rice arrives in Warsaw to sign US-Polish missile deal
  • Poland won't be intimidated over US missiles: president

  • The M2-F1 - An Aircraft Without Wings
  • China's Tianjin building runway for Airbus test flights: report
  • NASA evaluates new wing sensor
  • Russia And China May Co-Design New Passenger Plane

  • Predator Passes 400,000 Flight Hours
  • Unmanned Vehicles Go Head-To-Head On Salisbury Plain
  • Latest UAV Spreads It's Wings In Southern Afghanistan
  • Thales's Watchkeeper Programme Passes Flight Trials

  • Sadr Making Plan For Iraq
  • Feature: Success alters U.S. Iraq tactics
  • Dogs of War: Blackwater as Wal-Mart
  • Analysis: Oversight of contractors lags

  • Putin vows 24 billion dollars for Russian hi-tech: report
  • Boeing Awarded Contract To Continue Developing Mobile Laser Weapon
  • Lockheed Martin C-5m Super Galaxy Completes Flight Test
  • Is Russian Air Power Facing Up To Training Issues Part Two

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement