. Military Space News .
Indian coalition still deadlocked over nuclear deal: officials

by Staff Writers
New Delhi (AFP) June 25, 2008
Crisis talks between India's ruling Congress party and its left-wing allies ended Wednesday without them resolving a dispute over a nuclear energy deal with the United States, officials said.

The parties, however, agreed to meet "in due course" for more negotiations over the pact with Washington, a divisive accord that has threatened to bring down the government and send India into early elections.

Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee told reporters the government coalition partners discussed "all aspects" of the deal, which would open India to long-denied Western nuclear energy technology.

Mukherjee, who led the 90-minute meeting between his Congress party and its anti-American communist partners, who are fiercely opposed to the deal, said the two sides will hold further talks.

"The next meeting of the committee to be convened in due course will finalise its findings," he told reporters, declining to reply to questions.

Congress party sources said the next round of the deadlocked talks were likely after a gap of at least 10 days to allow the powerful Marxists to hold their own separate conclave on the thorny deal on Sunday.

India, a declared nuclear weapons power that refuses to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), is currently barred from buying atomic energy technology.

But the pact with the United States would bypass that by allowing India to shop for such hardware and fuel if it can separate its civil and military nuclear programmes and allow some United Nations inspections.

India must work out a safeguards agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency and get a waiver from the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group.

The agreement then would return to the US Congress for ratification. New Delhi is aiming to get the deal there before US President George W. Bush leaves office in January 2009.

India's communists on the other hand have vowed to force early elections if the government forges ahead with implementing the deal.

"At the moment, we oppose the deal in its present form," Communist Party of India leader Doraiswamy Raja told AFP, signalling the unbending stance of the communists who have 59 MPs in India's 543-member parliament.

Congress, which swept to power in 2004, has 153 MPs and desperately needs the backing of the communists to last its full five-year term in office until May 2009.

It is unclear if Congress is ready to test the communists and try and push through the deal, which was signed in 2005, or face an electorate unhappy with double-digit inflation.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said the deal was crucial for India to continue fuelling economic growth. The country imports 70 percent of its crude oil needs and badly requires alternative sources of energy -- including new atomic reactors.

But leftist leaders said the benefits of the deal have been exaggerated, and they have opposed entering the traditionally non-aligned India into a strategic pact with Washington.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Security of US nuclear arms in Europe is not our problem: NATO
Brussels (AFP) June 23, 2008
The security of US nuclear arms deployed in Europe is a matter for Washington and the host nation, not for NATO, an alliance official said Monday responding to a report outlining shortfalls.







  • China Deploys Bomber Coverage Of Korea And Taiwan From Shandong Peninsula
  • Britain can't fight two wars at same time: Military chief
  • Climate change will impact US national security
  • China welcomes first Japanese warship since WWII

  • London mayor pulls out of global anti-nuclear group: office
  • Syrian nuclear probe off to 'good start': IAEA chief inspector
  • Top US military officer heads to Israel with Iran on the agenda
  • NKorea may come off US terror list soon: White House

  • Olympics: China deploys missiles to guard Games
  • Raytheon Delivers 1,000th Tomahawk Block IV Cruise Missile To US Navy
  • Russia Destroys 20 Ballistic Missiles In 2008 Under START Treaty
  • Analysis: Missiles aimed at Taiwan

  • BMD Base Woes Continue In Former Eastern Bloc Part Two
  • US taps Lithuania as alternative to Poland for missile shield plan
  • Outside View: BMD base woes -- Part 1
  • BMD Focus: Will Lithuania host BMD base?

  • China to roll out new turboprop plane: report
  • IATA head slams EU plans to include aviation in emissions trading
  • A Plane With Wings Of Glass
  • US Airways signs code-sharing deal with Air China

  • Rockwell Collins Controls And Lands Wing-Damaged UAV
  • Predator, Reaper Unit Becomes Air Expeditionary Wing
  • UK Defence Committee Enquiry Into ISTAR And Role Of UAVs
  • Boeing Awarded Navy Contract For ScanEagle Services

  • Security gains in Iraq are fragile, reversible: Pentagon
  • Its A Shamal World For Combat Weather Airmen
  • USAF Counter Insurgency Strategies Part Three
  • Dogs of War: CACI - Some Publicity Is Bad

  • Harris Receives HF Radio Order For MRAP Vehicles
  • Oxley Exhibits Advanced Land Systems Lighting Technology At DVD
  • Turkey, Italy launch attack helicopter project
  • Outside View: China's weapons -- Part 2

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement