. | . |
Indian coalition still deadlocked over nuclear deal: officials New Delhi (AFP) June 25, 2008 Crisis talks between India's ruling Congress party and its left-wing allies ended Wednesday without them resolving a dispute over a nuclear energy deal with the United States, officials said. The parties, however, agreed to meet "in due course" for more negotiations over the pact with Washington, a divisive accord that has threatened to bring down the government and send India into early elections. Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee told reporters the government coalition partners discussed "all aspects" of the deal, which would open India to long-denied Western nuclear energy technology. Mukherjee, who led the 90-minute meeting between his Congress party and its anti-American communist partners, who are fiercely opposed to the deal, said the two sides will hold further talks. "The next meeting of the committee to be convened in due course will finalise its findings," he told reporters, declining to reply to questions. Congress party sources said the next round of the deadlocked talks were likely after a gap of at least 10 days to allow the powerful Marxists to hold their own separate conclave on the thorny deal on Sunday. India, a declared nuclear weapons power that refuses to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), is currently barred from buying atomic energy technology. But the pact with the United States would bypass that by allowing India to shop for such hardware and fuel if it can separate its civil and military nuclear programmes and allow some United Nations inspections. India must work out a safeguards agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency and get a waiver from the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group. The agreement then would return to the US Congress for ratification. New Delhi is aiming to get the deal there before US President George W. Bush leaves office in January 2009. India's communists on the other hand have vowed to force early elections if the government forges ahead with implementing the deal. "At the moment, we oppose the deal in its present form," Communist Party of India leader Doraiswamy Raja told AFP, signalling the unbending stance of the communists who have 59 MPs in India's 543-member parliament. Congress, which swept to power in 2004, has 153 MPs and desperately needs the backing of the communists to last its full five-year term in office until May 2009. It is unclear if Congress is ready to test the communists and try and push through the deal, which was signed in 2005, or face an electorate unhappy with double-digit inflation. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said the deal was crucial for India to continue fuelling economic growth. The country imports 70 percent of its crude oil needs and badly requires alternative sources of energy -- including new atomic reactors. But leftist leaders said the benefits of the deal have been exaggerated, and they have opposed entering the traditionally non-aligned India into a strategic pact with Washington. Community Email This Article Comment On This Article Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com All about missiles at SpaceWar.com Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
Security of US nuclear arms in Europe is not our problem: NATO Brussels (AFP) June 23, 2008 The security of US nuclear arms deployed in Europe is a matter for Washington and the host nation, not for NATO, an alliance official said Monday responding to a report outlining shortfalls. |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |