. Military Space News .
Iran, Syria seeking seat on IAEA board: diplomats

by Staff Writers
Vienna (AFP) Sept 19, 2008
Iran and Syria, both under fire for allegedly engaging in clandestine nuclear activity, are two possible candidates for a seat on the board of the UN atomic watchdog, much to the consternation of Western states, diplomatic sources said Friday.

Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency's 35-member board of governors are designated and elected each year by the body's highest policy-making body, the General Conference, which comprises all 144 member states.

As of this year, there will be 145 members and this year's General Conference will be held from September 29 until October 4.

And a seat is set to become free this year with the expiry of Pakistan's one-year term.

The seat is to be allocated to another country within the so-called Middle East and South Asia (MESA) group and diplomats close to the IAEA told AFP that there are four possible candidates: Iran, Syria, Afghanistan and Kazakhstan.

MESA has until the end of the general conference to decide on a single candidate and the choice is normally adopted by consensus.

The problem is that with both Iran and Syria currently in the dock over their purported clandestine nuclear work, their nomination would almost certainly run into resistance if MESA decided to choose either of them, diplomats said.

And that could mean that a vote would have to be called at this year's General Conference, unprecedented in the IAEA's history.

The IAEA has been investigating Iran's contested nuclear programme for the past five years, but has so far been able to determine whether the activities are entirely peaceful as Tehran claims.

Western powers accuse the Islamic republic of using technology for nuclear energy as a guise to build an atomic bomb.

The United Nations Security Council has slapped three rounds of sanctions on Iran over its refusal to come clean about its nuclear programme and its refusal to cede to international demands to cease uranium enrichment, a process which can be used to make the fissile material for a nuclear bomb.

Syria, which last sat on the IAEA's board in 2006, has also fallen into disrepute after the United States alleged that it was building a covert nuclear facility at a remote desert site called Al-Kibar until it was destroyed by Israeli bombs in September 2007.

Damascus allowed a three-member team from the IAEA to visit Al-Kibar in June, but has since refused any follow-up visit. And a diplomat close to the IAEA told AFP on Friday that an official request to visit "three or four" other sites allegedly involved in clandestine nuclear activities has so far gone unanswered.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, diplomats said that the United States would not be happy if MESA decided to name either Syria or Iran as their candidate for a seat on the board.

Thus, Western states were hoping that MESA would choose a candidate that would allow the nomination to be adopted by consensus, "that is to say, neither Syria nor Iran," one diplomat said.

related report
No reply from Syria to IAEA over suspect sites: diplomat
Syria has yet to reply to a request from the UN atomic watchdog to let it inspect three or four sites allegedly involved in clandestine nuclear activities, diplomatic sources said Friday.

In June, Syria allowed a three-member team from the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit Al-Kibar in a remote desert area of northeastern Syria on the Euphrates River.

The United States claims the site, razed to the ground by Israeli planes in September 2007, was a nuclear facility built with North Korean help and was close to becoming operational.

But Syria has since ruled out a follow-up trip, saying it had agreed to one visit only.

At the time, diplomats had said the nuclear watchdog was also interested in two or three other sites, allegedly used to store the debris of the destroyed building.

A diplomat close to the IAEA told AFP on Friday that an official request by the IAEA to visit "three or four other sites" had so far gone unanswered by Damascus.

The request was apparently made after the IAEA received new information, probably from western secret services, the diplomat said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The findings of the initial visit, which was led by the nuclear watchdog's deputy director general Olli Heinonen, have still to be evaluated.

So the Syrian dossier is not officially on the agenda of next week's meeting of the IAEA's 35-member board.

But IAEA Director General Mohamed ElBaradei is expected to talk about Syria in his opening address to the assembly on Monday, diplomats said.

And the dossier could be discussed in greater deal at the IAEA's next board meeting in November, by which time the findings of the first trip might be known, diplomats added.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Thompson Files: Nuclear deterrent at risk
Arlington, Va. (UPI) Sep 18, 2008
Here's a quick quiz about national security. What is the single greatest danger to America's survival? Global terrorism? Biological warfare? Cyberattacks? Nope, none of the above. The biggest threat by far is still the Russian nuclear arsenal. If Russian leaders decided to launch a large-scale strategic missile attack against America right now, most of the people you know would be dead by sunset. And there's basically nothing we could do about it -- nothing, that is, except destroy Russia in retaliation.







  • NATO says may boost defence planning, amid chill with Russia
  • The Coming War Might Be A Hot One Part Three
  • Defense Focus: Coming wars -- Part Two
  • Russian Fleet May Go To Mediterranean

  • NKorea preparing to restart nuclear reactor: official
  • Coming weeks key in US-Russia nuclear cooperation: US
  • Iran, Syria seeking seat on IAEA board: diplomats
  • Ahmadinejad warns Iran will 'break hands' of invaders

  • Eurocopter Fires Spike Missile From HAD Tiger
  • NKorea conducts engine tests at new missile site: report
  • US Navy's New Submarine Class Conducts Tomahawk Cruise Missile Launches
  • NZ Navy And Air Force Test Fire Missile

  • Raytheon To Develop New Missile Defense Interceptor
  • Czechs, US sign agreement on forces for missile defence system
  • Japan shoots down test missile in US: ministry
  • Outside View: Russia vs. BMD -- Part Two

  • Safer Skies For The Flying Public
  • Chinese airlines fly into headwinds in Olympic year
  • The M2-F1 - An Aircraft Without Wings
  • China's Tianjin building runway for Airbus test flights: report

  • USAF Develops Plan For Filling Unmanned Aircraft System Positions
  • Unmanned Aircraft Continue To Prove Worth On Modern Battlefield
  • QinetiQ Rolls Out Field-Transformable Dragon Runner SUGV
  • US drones bring fear and firepower to Qaeda war in Pakistan

  • Dogs of War: WPPS World
  • Analysis: Senators call for Iraqi oil fund
  • US-Iraq security pact facing 'dangerous' obstacles: PM
  • Odierno warns on Iraq security as he takes US command

  • LockMart Provides Perspective On Air Mobility Future
  • US to sell bunker-busting bombs to Israel: Pentagon
  • First Run Of Boeing Laser JDAM Demonstrated On B-52H
  • Boeing Awarded Contract For Radar Upgrade On Saudi AWACS Fleet

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement