. Military Space News .
Iran will not tolerate threats during talks: Ahmadinejad aide

Iran's attack ban proposal fails to win support at IAEA meet
Iran has failed to secure backing among fellow developing nations at meeting of the UN atomic watchdog here for its proposed ban on attacks on nuclear sites, diplomats said Thursday. Iran had wanted to table a resolution at the International Atomic Energy Agency's 150-nation general conference prohibiting armed attacks or threat of attacks against nuclear installations, either under construction or in opoeraton. But the so-called Non-Aligned Movement -- a grouping of developing countries -- refused to endorse the resolution as a single bloc, putting a question mark over the overall level of support for such a resolution at the meeting. Diplomats said Iran might now withdraw the resolution. The NAM would have had to endorse it by consensus, but Chile and Singapore refused to put their names to it, arguing that any such ban should only apply to installations that had been verified to be peaceful, diplomats said.

Europeans watch as Obama plays waiting game on Iran: analysts
European powers seeking a hard line on Iran's nuclear plans are now caught between China and Russia, which oppose sanctions, and the United States, which is playing a waiting game, experts said Wednesday. "The Americans don't know what to do any more," said a European official who asked not to be named. "They're looking for a way out but all there is is a black hole." US President Barack Obama said during his election campaign and in the early months of his presidency this year that he would be willing to sit down for talks with Iran, which is suspected of building a nuclear bomb.

He gave Iran a deadline of September to respond to the offer, but Washington said this week that the latest package of proposals from Tehran on its nuclear programme fell short of US expectations. The UN General Assembly next week and a subsequent G20 summit in Pittsburgh had been seen as a chance for world powers to discuss whether to move ahead with a tough new regime of sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme. But earlier this month at a meeting of the six world powers tackling the Iranian nuclear crisis, Russia and China refused to consider new economic sanctions against the Islamic republic. Faced with the failure of his outstretched hand policy, "the only way for the US president to save face was to say: 'Let's continue the dialogue'," said Denis Bauchard of the French Institute of International Affairs (IFRI). "It's the opposite of the situation two or three years ago," said Pascal Boniface of the Paris-based International and Strategical Relations Institute (IRIS). "(Then) the Europeans were ready to negotiate and the Bush administration was taking a hard line," he said.

by Staff Writers
Tehran (AFP) Sept 16, 2009
Iran will not tolerate threats from world powers when they discuss Tehran's package of proposals on October 1, a top aide to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told AFP in an interview.

Ali Akbar Javanfekr, media advisor to Ahmadinejad, also said that accepting the Islamic republic as a nuclear power was the "first step" towards normalising relations between Tehran, Washington and the West.

"Iran is a nuclear power. We won't accept any threats during the negotiations or even after. We want negotiations based on logic and international laws," Javanfekr said in an wide-ranging interview at his Tehran office late on Tuesday.

"They have to accept a nuclear Iran and have to negotiate with a nuclear Iran."

Iran and representatives of six world powers -- the United States, Britain, Russia, France, China and Germany -- are to meet on October 1, probably in Turkey, to discuss Tehran's proposals aimed at allaying concerns over its nuclear programme.

The United States, Israel, and other world powers suspect Tehran is making an atomic bomb under the guise of a civilian nuclear programme. The Islamic republic denies the charge.

The six powers -- known as the P5+1 -- had given Tehran a late September deadline for holding talks and had warned that a failure to do so would lead to further sanctions.

Iran is already under three sets of UN sanctions slapped for its refusal to abandon the sensitive uranium enrichment programme, the process which produces nuclear fuel or, in highly extended form, the fissile core of an atomic bomb.

Javanfekr said Iran's nuclear programme was in accordance with international laws.

"What we want is that they (world powers) respect our nuclear rights and also other rights," he said. "This can be the first step towards normalising relations with US and the West."

Javanfekr also reiterated what other top Iranian officials, including supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, have been saying -- Tehran will not negotiate over its nuclear programme during the talks on October 1.

"We have said negotiations will be based on our package and our package does not include Iran's nuclear programme. As our president has said the nuclear question is over," the softly-spoken official said.

Tehran's package attempts to address the issue of global nuclear disarmament but avoids mentioning its own atomic programme, including its uranium enrichment drive.

The key difference between Tehran's latest package and its May 2008 package is that the previous document showed Iran's willingess to form an international consortium to enrich uranium, but the updated version avoids talking of such a possibility.

"We have the technology and that is a reality which they have to accept," Javanfekr said, suggesting that Ahmadinejad's announcement earlier this year that Iran had mastered the nuclear fuel cycle was probably the reason Tehran now feels it unnecessary to be part of an international uranium consortium.

"The situation would have been different if we had not mastered this technology. They have to understand that we have made progress in other fields also and our progress has been fast," he added.

Earlier this year Iran announced it had sent its first domestically-built satellite, Omid (Hope), into orbit.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Tuesday that Iran must answer "head on" concerns about its nuclear programme during the October talks.

"We have made clear to the Iranians that any talks we participate in must address the nuclear issue head on. It cannot be ignored," Clinton said.

Javanfekr said Iran is ready to discuss with the P5+1 and "does not want any tensions with the world powers."

"But during the talks we will definitely speak of banning nuclear arms globally because it is not a problem for us as we do not possess any nuclear arms."

Javanfekr said Iran is ready to step up its cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

"Our cooperation with the IAEA is of the highest level and we are ready for more cooperation," he said. Iran recently permitted IAEA inspectors to its heavy-water plant in Arak, located in the province of Markezi.

Javanfekr was also critical of Barack Obama, saying the US president had failed to change the American policy towards Iran.

"He only talks of change, but has done nothing concrete. He can release the Iranian money which America seized after the (Islamic) revolution or put an end to sanctions," he said.

Soon after the capture of US embassy in Iran by Islamist students in 1979, then US President Jimmy Carter ordered freezing of Iranian assets held in the US. Iran says the amount is worth around 10 billion dollars, but US officials claim it to be much less.

Obama has initiated several diplomatic overtures towards Iran to resolve the nuclear controversy as well as help ease the 30-year animosity between the two nations.

But Javanfekr, becoming visibly upset, said Obama missed a key opportunity by "not congratulating our president on his election victory."

earlier related report
Swift sanctions against Iran a 'serious mistake': Russia
Imposing swift additional sanctions against Iran over its nuclear programme would be a "serious mistake," Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Thursday.

"Today there is a real chance to conclude talks whose results should be an agreement restoring trust in the purely peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear programme," Lavrov said in televised remarks.

"Disrupting this chance by demanding swift imposition of sanctions would be a serious mistake," he added.

Iran is due to hold talks with six world powers over its nuclear programme on October 1, the outcome of which could determine whether the United States and its allies seek additional sanctions.

Lavrov reiterated Russia's stance that the international community should continue negotiations with Iran and warned that using military action to prevent Tehran from acquiring an atomic bomb would be "catastrophic."

"The problem of the Iranian nuclear programme can only be resolved through am all-embracing negotiated solution in a regional context, and not through force," Lavrov said.

"Attempts to use force would have catastrophic effect for the entire Middle East region," he said during a foreign policy address in Moscow.

The United States, the European Union and Israel fear that Iran is secretly building nuclear arms under the guise of its civilian nuclear power programme, but Tehran denies the charge and insists the programme is peaceful.

Washington and Jerusalem have never ruled out the option of air strikes to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities.

The United Nations Security Council has already imposed three sets of sanctions against Iran over its refusal to freeze its uranium enrichment activities which could be used to build an atomic bomb.

Russia, which is a permanent member of the UN Security Council as well as one of the six powers negotiating with Tehran, has long resisted calls for tougher sanctions against the Islamic Republic over its nuclear programme.

Russia is helping build Tehran's first civilian nuclear power plant in the southern Iranian city of Bushehr, and has reportedly agreed to sell its advanced S-300 anti-aircraft missiles to Iran.

Deployment of the missiles around Iran's nuclear facilities would greatly enhance its defences against an air strike.

A top Israeli polician, Zeev Elkin, said in an interview published Thursday that delivery of the S-300s to Iran could compel the Jewish state to attack.

"The anti-aircraft missiles would greatly complicate or make impossible a military solution, and thus could push Israel to act much sooner than it would in the current conditions," Elkin, head of the Likud party's group in the Knesset, told Russia's Kommersant daily.

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Iran says 'new framework of cooperation' agreed with IAEA
Vienna (AFP) Sept 15, 2009
Iran has agreed new terms of cooperation with the UN atomic watchdog regarding the agency's investigation into Tehran's nuclear activities, a top Iranian official said here Tuesday. But the head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation, Ali Akbar Salehi, declined to say what the new cooperation would entail. A source close to the International Atomic Energy Agency told AFP that nothing ... read more







The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2009 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement