. Military Space News .
Iraq military deal won't tie US hands: State dept

US not interested in permanent Iraq bases: Gates
The United States has no interest in setting up permanent bases in Iraq, US Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Thursday. Gates sought to dismiss concerns among critics that a planned US military accord with Iraq would tie the hands of future US presidents regarding the mandate of US troops in the war-torn country and create permanent US bases there. "I think it is pretty clear that such an agreement would not talk about force levels. It would not involve -- we have no interest in permanent bases," he told reporters. The US defense chief also insisted that discussions had just barely started on the on the still-to-be-negotiated Status of Forces Agreement.
by Staff Writers
Washington (AFP) Jan 24, 2008
A planned US military accord with Iraq aims to keep security options open rather than tie "the hands of future policy makers" or leave permanent US bases there, a US official said Thursday.

State Department deputy spokesman Tom Casey sought to dismiss fears that the US administration and President George W. Bush would use the deal to lock the next US leader into an open-ended military commitment in Iraq.

"If anybody is worried that this agreement somehow ties the hands of future policy makers, it's just simply not true," Casey told reporters.

When asked if the agreement would include any reference to permanent bases, he replied: "We're not seeking permanent bases in Iraq. That's been a clear matter of policy for some time. No, the agreement is not a basing agreement."

Asked how Washington would respond if Baghdad asked for bases, he replied a distinction had to be made between the legal foundation on which US troops operate over a given term and tactical decisions on how to proceed.

"Those are the decisions that are made by US commanders on the ground, working with their Iraqi counterparts, and ultimately blessed by policy makers," he said.

Casey said the still-to-be-negotiated Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) would provide a legal framework for keeping US and Iraqi security policy options open beyond 2008, when the UN mandate for US forces ends.

For example, he added, it would give US forces the option of continuing to hunt members of Al-Qaeda and train Iraqi troops.

Such an agreement "is very much the model that we use for regular bilateral relations between the United States and most other countries in the world," Casey said.

During a routine daily State Department briefing dominated by talk over the planned arrangement, Casey repeated it would "not tie anyone's hands" and insisted it would just "normalize" ties between the two countries.

"There is no anticipation that this is somehow going to forever lock in stone a particular level of troops or a particular set of activities or goals. Again, it's a legal framework," he said.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
Iraq: The first technology war of the 21st century



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


US unlikely to cut Iraq forces below pre-surge levels: analysts
Washington (AFP) Jan 23, 2008
President George W. Bush is unlikely to reduce US forces in Iraq to less than levels just before the surge this year for fear of putting at risk security gains, US analysts said Wednesday.







  • NATO chief urges Russia to stop 'unhelpful rhetoric'
  • Walker's World: China or Russia?
  • US concerned over China military build-up, Taiwan: admiral
  • Taiwan condemns China's 'chequebook diplomacy' over Malawi ties

  • US says Iran sanctions will be 'punitive'
  • N. Korea used UN-linked accounts for arms sales: US probe
  • More Russian nuclear fuel delivered to Iran
  • Outside View: World free of nukes

  • NATO Could Use US Missiles For South East Theater Defense
  • Analysis: Capabilities of Chinese missiles
  • Israel test-fires ballistic missile after Iran warning
  • MEADS Receives Contract To Incorporate New PAC-3 Missile Segment Enhancement

  • ABM Turnaround In Seoul With SM-3s For Sejong The Great
  • Olmert briefed on Israeli missile shield progress
  • US hopeful of agreement soon with Czechs on radar
  • Seoul to equip ships to intercept NKorea missiles: report

  • Qatar Airways looking to natural gas fuel
  • EADS offers to build military, civilian aircraft in US
  • Purdue Wind Tunnel Key For Hypersonic Vehicles And Future Space Planes
  • Antarctic ballooning hits milestone

  • Iraq War See Widespread Use Of Unmanned Air Vehicles
  • BAE Systems Delivers UAV Target Detection Systems To US Army
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Show Battlefield To Soldiers
  • GA-ASI And SENER Sign Teaming Agreement On Predator UAS Series

  • Iraq military deal won't tie US hands: State dept
  • US unlikely to cut Iraq forces below pre-surge levels: analysts
  • Truth was first US casualty in Iraq war: study
  • Pentagon confident in armored vehicles despite first fatality

  • Eurofighter Typhoon Logs Over 35,000 Flying Hours
  • Raytheon To Provide Revolutionary AESA Capabilities To 135 F/A-18s
  • Boeing Completes Flight Of First AEW And C Wedgetail Aircraft Modified In Australia
  • Rheinmetall To Supply Kodiak Armoured Engineer Vehicles To Sweden And The Netherlands

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement