. | . |
Israel's New Security Doctrine
Washington (UPI) Jan 09, 2006 A new national security doctrine for Israel was already taking shape before Prime Minister Ariel Sharon was felled by a massive stroke. The roadmap for a negotiated two-state solution with the Palestinians went the way of the dodo long before Sharon was incapacitated. Hamas, which the State Department ranks as a terrorist organization, and that advocates the destruction of the state of Israel, had been steadily gaining Palestinian public opinion approval. Surveys indicated Hamas would gain approximately 45 percent of the seats, possibly a majority, in the Jan. 25 elections for a new Palestinian parliament. This, in turn, would paralyze the Palestinian government's ability to negotiate the "viable and contiguous state" the roadmap called for. Hamas, which has not forsaken terrorism, also maintains a powerful militia. It is better equipped than the official security force. Sharon had already made sure such a Palestinian state could not be negotiated even under the best of circumstances. The 420-mile physical barrier that now separates Israel and the Palestinian territories, and which, in effect, annexes some 15 percent of the West Bank to include major Jewish settlements, is designed to be Israel's permanent border. The barrier, in many places, is actually a wall that is taller than the old Berlin Wall. Whatever happens on the other side of this new $2 billion frontier is up to the Palestinians. There is nothing to negotiate. Sharon also made sure Arab East Jerusalem could never become the capital of a Palestinian state by blocking any "contiguous" access to the West Bank. The barrier will protect the majority of the 240,000 Israeli settlers in the West Bank as it snakes in and out of Palestinian territory. Those beyond that protection are on high ground and organized for self-defense. But their tenuous positions will be a powerful incentive to resettle under IDF protection. Since the Israeli evacuation of Gaza last summer, anarchy and utter chaos appear to be the new lawless coalition. Youth is 70 percent jobless. Most of them join various militias. Unemployment averages 30 percent. The Palestinian government is ignored as rival Palestinian militias fight for turf. The Palestinian Authority is bankrupt, apparently abandoned or at least ignored by the Arab oil-rich states that now rake in almost $1 billion a day with oil bumping $60 a barrel. Israeli forces still control land, air and sea access in and out of Gaza and Sharon's new doctrine is to ignore what happens in the Palestinian territories unless mortar rounds or missiles are lobbed into Israel. This triggers instant retaliation with air strikes and precision-guided ordnance. A few days before the 2004 Presidential elections, Brent Scowcroft, the former National Security Adviser to President Bush 41, told the Financial Times the Sharon Plan for peace was to get out of Gaza and four minor settlements in the northern West Bank -- and call it a day. Whether this happened by design or by osmosis is irrelevant because today it is reality. The new security doctrine, as it was evolving before Sharon's tragic exit from the political arena, was geared to cope with Israel's new principal enemy -- Iran's mullahocracy. The outgoing Israeli military intelligence chief, Gen. Aharon Zeevi-Farkash warned last month that diplomatic negotiations with Iran would become useless after March 1. This is when Farkash believes the enrichment of uranium to weapons-grade strength will begin in secret underground locations dotted around the country. Iran has been conducting a secret nuclear weapons program for the past 18 years. It was launched with the help of Dr.A.Q. Khan, the father of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal. The U.S. has been trying to get direct access to Dr. Khan, now under house arrest in Islamabad, since the CIA and Britain's MI6 in late 2003 pieced together the clandestine nuclear Wal-Mart he had put together on behalf of America's enemies. The last two "moderate" Iranian presidents -- Mohammad Khatami, who dominated Iran's politics in the 1990s, and Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, who did the same in the 1980s -- made clear in homilies at Friday prayers at Tehran University several years ago that when Islam breaks Israel's nuclear monopoly, the strategic equation in the Middle East will shift dramatically. Rafsanjani even pointed out that just one nuclear weapon could make Israel disappear in a mushroom cloud. More recently, the new Iranian President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a populist former mayor of Tehran, said Israel should be "wiped off the map." So irrespective of who succeeds Sharon, the new national security doctrine is unlikely to change. By the same token, the Iranian mullahs are unlikely to change their nuclear plans, any more than North Korea will, except to indulge the West's nuclear negotiators - the U.K., France and Germany -- in more diplomatic sleight of hand diplomacy. In Israel's next elections March 28, the emerging strategic equation favors the hard-liner Binyamin Netanyahu, a former Prime Minister, who became head of the Likud party when Sharon bolted to form the new Kadima (Forward) party. Netanyahu staunchly opposed giving up Gaza. Iran did not disperse its nuclear facilities in 15 different underground facilities to produce nuclear power for peaceful purposes, as the clerical theocrats claim. The U.S. has started to sound out secretly some NATO countries to determine whether joint air strikes would be feasible. So far, European reactions have been negative as they feel diplomacy should stay on track until it can be handed over to the U.N. Security Council with a request for draconian economic sanctions. Vice President Cheney, a year ago, said if the time for military action against Iran were to come, Israel would probably be the first to act. A financial advice website headlined last week, "When Smart Bombs Pop Over Tehran, Gold Will Pop To Over $1,000/oz" Gold's high water mark was at $800 in the early 1980s. It closed last week at $541.20. "Netanyahu," the electronic tip sheet "LeMetropole" said, "won't mess around with Iran by begging for useless negotiations as the EU-3 are presently doing with Iran...It won't matter what Iran says, truth or not, Israel will defend itself from being "wiped off the map."
Source: United Press International Related Links SpaceDaily Search SpaceDaily Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express NKorean Financial Sanctions Based On Solid Evidence Washington (AFP) Jan 09, 2006 The United States said Monday that sanctions imposed on nuclear-armed North Korea for alleged illicit financial activities were based on carefully scrutinized evidence, rejecting Pyongyang's contention that the charges were groundless. |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |