. Military Space News .




.
THE STANS
Karzai accuses NATO of failure over attacks
by Staff Writers
Kabul (AFP) April 16, 2012

Afghan soldier shot dead after attacking NATO allies
Kandahar, Afghanistan (AFP) April 16, 2012 - NATO troops killed an Afghan soldier inside a military base Monday after he opened fire on them, a military official said, amid a spate of attacks by local forces on their foreign allies.

The attack took place at the Atal Army Corps base, just outside Kandahar city in the south of the country.

"An army soldier has opened fire on ISAF vehicle to kill troops," Afghan army commander for southern Afghanistan General Abdul Hameed Hameed told AFP.

The troops returned fire and killed the assailant, he added.

NATO's US-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) said "we are aware of the incident" but give no details, saying an investigation was under way.

Since the start of the year members of the Western-funded Afghan security forces have killed 17 coalition personnel in what authorities call "green-on-blue" attacks.

After many of the killings the Taliban, the main militant group behind a 10-year insurgency, claim the attackers were their fighters infiltrating the Afghan security forces.

NATO officials however, have dismissed the claims, saying the bulk of the assaults had individual motives such as stress, fatigue and family issues.

There are about 130,000 US-led NATO troops in Afghanistan fighting the Taliban but most of the troops will leave the war-torn country by 2014 when Afghans are due to take over security responsibilities.


Afghan President Hamid Karzai Monday blamed intelligence failures, particularly on the part of NATO forces supporting his government, for the worst coordinated insurgent attacks in 10 years of war.

Karzai's accusation came after an unprecedented 18-hour assault by squads of Taliban militants, some disguised as women in burqas, on government offices, embassies and foreign bases in Kabul and neighbouring provinces.

"The terrorists' infiltration in Kabul and other provinces is an intelligence failure for us and especially for NATO and should be seriously investigated," Karzai said in a statement.

Explosions and gunfire rocked the capital Sunday and overnight before Afghan forces regained control, heightening fears for the future of the vulnerable nation as NATO prepares to withdraw its 130,000 troops.

The Western alliance, which is committed to pulling out by the end of 2014 whatever happens militarily, put a positive spin on the attacks, hailing the performance of Afghan security forces.

Karzai also praised the rapid response by Afghan security forces, saying it "proved to the people that they can defend their country successfully".

But his laying of the major share of the blame on troops whose home countries are already tired of the long war and its enormous cost is unlikely to go down well with his allies.

The attacks in Kabul and neighbouring provinces killed 11 members of the security forces and four civilians and wounded 32 civilians and around 42 security personnel, Karzai said.

Thirty-six insurgents were also killed, the interior ministry said.

The United States said the attacks were likely carried out by Haqqani militants who operate from sanctuaries in neighbouring Pakistan and dismissed Karzai's claim of an intelligence failure.

"Initial indications are that the Haqqani network was involved in this set of attacks that occurred yesterday in Kabul," Pentagon press secretary George Little said Monday.

"I don't believe this was an intelligence failure. We did sense that something like this might happen," he added.

Martine van Bijlert of the Afghanistan Analysts' Network said: "That they did manage to pull off simultaneous complex attacks shows quite a level of sophistication in preventing detection... so that would be a failure in intelligence.

"But having said that, in a big bustling city like Kabul it is incredibly difficult to stop this type of attack."

Afghan security forces took the lead in countering the insurgents, who were finally routed early Monday, but a spokesman for NATO forces said they had provided air support in response to requests from the Afghans.

"I am enormously proud of how quickly Afghan security forces responded to (the) attacks in Kabul," said General John Allen, commander of NATO's International Security Assistance Force.

ISAF labelled the attacks "largely ineffective". However, the fact that so many militants managed to make it through Kabul's so-called "Ring of Steel" checkpoints and attack high-value targets was a propaganda coup for the Taliban.

A Western diplomat with security expertise told AFP: "I don't share at all the optimism of NATO or the Americans.

"It's true that they did it better than in the past -- there is progress but still, to build up so many attacks and being able to launch them simultaneously demonstrates clearly (the Taliban's) ability to strike where and when they want," he said on condition of anonymity.

NATO insisted that the attacks would not influence its plans to withdraw.

"Clearly we still face security challenges," NATO spokeswoman Oana Lungescu told a news briefing in Brussels.

"But such attacks don't change the transition strategy, they don't change the goal and they don't change the timeline that we all agreed to at the Lisbon summit in November 2010," she said.

The US, British, German and Japanese embassy compounds came under fire as militants attacked the city's diplomatic enclave and tried to storm parliament, sparking a gun battle as lawmakers and bodyguards fired back from the rooftop.

Outside the capital, militants attacked government buildings in Logar province, the airport in Jalalabad, and a police facility in the town of Gardez in Paktya province.

The attacks marked the biggest assault on the capital in 10 years of war in terms of their spread and coordination, observers say.

In September last year Taliban attacks targeting locations including the US embassy and headquarters of foreign troops in Kabul killed at least 14 during a 19-hour siege.

burs-pdh/mtp

Related Links
News From Across The Stans




.
.
Get Our Free Newsletters Via Email
...
Buy Advertising Editorial Enquiries




Insurgent attack on Kabul mainly 'symbolic': US
Washington (AFP) April 16, 2012 - An 18-hour insurgent attack on Kabul achieved "no tactical gains" and was largely symbolic, US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Monday, praising the response of Afghan security forces.

"There were no tactical gains here. These are isolated attacks that are done for symbolic purposes," Panetta told a news conference.

He said "the Afghan army and police did a great job of reacting to these attacks.

"They quickly restored order, they quickly restored security in those areas."

The Pentagon chief added that the Taliban and its allies have been unable to regain territory lost in the past year and that NATO's war strategy "is succeeding."

In Sunday's elaborate attack, teams of militants -- some disguised as women in burqas -- targeted government offices, embassies and foreign bases in Kabul and neighboring provinces.

The attacks left 51 dead, including four civilians, 11 members of the security forces and 36 militants.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai Monday blamed intelligence failures, particularly on the part of NATO forces, for the biggest coordinated militant attacks on Kabul in 10 years of war.

Both Panetta and the US military's top officer, General Martin Dempsey, told reporters there had been intelligence reports that indicated a potential threat from Haqqani militants, who exploit sanctuaries in neighboring Pakistan.

But the reports of a possible attack were "vague about timing," Dempsey said.

The Pentagon has blamed the Haqqani network for the attack but Dempsey said it was unclear if the attack could be traced back to Haqqani havens in Pakistan.

"The threat, you know, the Haqqani network exists on both sides of the border, so we're not prepared to suggest this emanated out of Pakistan," he said.

The general also said Afghan forces performed well and that the attack underscored how NATO-led troops and the Afghan government still had to confront the Taliban insurgency.

"You ask, what does it mean? It means we're still in a fight. And I don't think any of us have ever suggested there wouldn't be fighting ...still needing to be done," Dempsey said.



.

. Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle



THE STANS
Pakistan arms ban no bar to NATO convoys: analysts
Islamabad (AFP) April 14, 2012
Pakistan's insistence that no arms transit through its territory to Afghanistan is largely a gesture to quell domestic anti-US sentiment and will not hinder the resumption of NATO convoys, analysts say. Islamabad stopped NATO supplies travelling overland from its southern Karachi port to Afghanistan in November amid public outrage after 24 Pakistani soldiers were killed in a US air strike on ... read more


THE STANS
Russian AA, ABM systems - alternative for India

Russia waiting for S-500 air defense system

Israeli leaders play macabre numbers game

Israel seeks $700M from U.S. for defense

THE STANS
Iraq seeks killer missiles, but U.S. wary

Russia, India in hypersonic missile talks

Lockheed Martin Receives THAAD Follow-On Development Contract

Tucson site is largest Raytheon facility to receive a superior rating

THE STANS
AAI Unmanned Aircraft Systems And KOR Electronics Enter Into Strategic Alliance

Indian navy commissions third UAV squadron

Pirates, Beware: US Navy Smart Robocopters Will Spy You in the Crowd

Iran commander denies report of US drone overflights

THE STANS
Fourth Boeing-built WGS Satellite Accepted by USAF

Raytheon to Continue Supporting Coalition Forces' Information-Sharing Computer Network

Northrop Grumman Wins Contract for USAF Command and Control Modernization Program

TacSat-4 Enables Polar Region SatCom Experiment

THE STANS
Lockheed Martin Brings F-35 Cockpit Demonstrator to Northrop Grumman in California

Russian air forces hit airlifter deadend

Northrop Grumman Achieves Major Milestone in Electronic Warfare Technology

Boeing, US Navy Conduct Networked Distributed Targeting Capability Flight Test on Super Hornet

THE STANS
Israeli defence minister heads to Colombia, US

US to reopen Afghan aircraft bid after cancellation

India unsettled by illegal firearms

Ukraine jails ex-defence minister for 5 years

THE STANS
China's Wen says corruption biggest danger to party

London on defensive over response to death in China

China gripped by Bo saga worthy of Hollywood

US wants separate summit with Putin at G8 in May: Moscow

THE STANS
High-res atomic imaging of specimens in liquid by TEM using graphene liquid cell

Carbon nanotubes can double growth of cell cultures important in industry

Nanoscale magnetic media diagnostics by rippling spin waves

Nanostarfruits are pure gold for research


Memory Foam Mattress Review

Newsletters :: SpaceDaily Express :: SpaceWar Express :: TerraDaily Express :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

.

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2012 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement