. Military Space News .
McChrystal report sets off debate

NATO chief endorses US commander's grim report
NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said on Monday he agreed with a grim assessment of the war in Afghanistan by the US commander there but stopped short of calling for more troops. "Basically I share the views presented by General (Stanley) McChrystal," Rasmussen said when asked about a leaked report by the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan. The general's analysis recognizes there is no military solution to the war and calls for a "more comprehensive approach" that seeks to safeguard the population, Rasmussen said after a speech at the Atlantic Council, a Washington think tank. He said he was not ready to comment on McChrystal's request for tens of thousands of additional troops to reinforce efforts to counter Islamist insurgents. "It would be premature to make any judgment here and now as regards a resource request," he said.

"Now we have to go through his initial assessment and analysis, discuss it within the alliance, agree on the approach and then we can make a decision on resources," he said. But he urged the NATO-led coalition to provide more advisers and funding to build up Afghan security forces which he said would pave the way for eventually scaling back the international military presence. The NATO chief said that "we need more resources for our training mission in Afghanistan, to develop the capacity of the Afghan security forces." Rasmussen's visit to Washington comes at a pivotal moment as President Barack Obama's advisers debate strategy in the eight-year-old war and a request from McChrytal for up to 40,000 additional troops. The former Danish prime minister held talks earlier with Defense Secretary Robert Gates and was due to meet Obama on Tuesday. With McChrystal's report describing a Kabul government plagued by corruption, Rasmussen said the Afghan leadership had to be held more accountable by donors to fight corruption and deliver services to its people. He called for a new "compact" between Kabul and the international community that would spell out the terms for aid.

In his speech, Rasmussen acknowledged declining public support in NATO countries for the war marked by the perception that the coalition was "not getting anywhere." He said a new approach was required and that "things are going to have to change." It was crucial to show evidence of a transition to Afghan leadership, with the Kabul government gradually taking responsibility for security, he said. "Sooner rather than later the transition must begin," he said. But he added his call was not a "run for the exits" and that "NATO would stay as long as it takes to succeed." He strongly rejected criticism in the United States that allies were running from the fight in Afghanistan, saying Canada and European countries had deployed large numbers of troops and lost soldiers in battle. "I will not accept from anyone the argument that the Europeans and the Canadians are not paying the price for success in Afghanistan. They are," he said. He reminded his American audience that 35,000 non-US troops were deployed in Afghanistan, out of a force of about 100,000. "If we are to succeed in Afghanistan, it will only be if we do it together." (AFP Report)

by Staff Writers
Kabul, Afghanistan (UPI) Sep 29, 2009
The final decision by U.S. President Barack Obama may be weeks away, but until then Gen. Stanley McChrystal's Afghanistan assessment report promises to be at the center of the widening debate on America's future course in the war effort in that difficult land.

In terms of clarity and forthrightness, the Obama administration couldn't have asked for more from the top commander of the U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan.

McChrystal's assessment, as reported by The Washington Post, which obtained a copy of the document, laid out in blunt terms the magnitude of the problems facing the coalition forces in Afghanistan, with a warning that without additional troops by next year, the conflict "likely will result in failure." The requested troop surge would be in addition to the 68,000 U.S. soldiers expected by the end of this year.

"Failure to gain the initiative and reverse insurgent momentum in the near term -- while Afghan security capacity matures -- risks an outcome where defeating the insurgency is no longer possible," McChrystal wrote in his report. He also noted in his summary, "While the situation is serious, success is still achievable."

The report was seen as being grim because of the worsening ground conditions in Afghanistan and the regrouped Taliban's ability to strike with ruthless force through much of the country despite the presence of about 100,000 U.S. and other NATO forces currently in the country.

Making matters more difficult for the Obama administration is the mounting military casualties, declining support for the war both within its own Democratic Party and the public at large, and Afghanistan's election mess arising from a torrent of voter-fraud complaints that threatens to further erode the credibility of President Hamid Karzai's corrupt government.

As Obama and his top officials reviewed the McChrystal report, they also reportedly explored other options not requiring the addition of more troops.

One of the alternatives the president is looking at is the suggestion by Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. for cutting back on U.S. forces, while concentrating more on rooting out al-Qaida both in Afghanistan and Pakistan, The New York Times reported.

In his assessment report, McChrystal identified three main insurgent groups in Afghanistan, the chief among them being the Quetta Shura Taliban led by Mullah Omar, operating from the Pakistani city of Quetta.

The Times of London, quoting senior Pakistani officials in New York, reported the United States might seek to extend its unmanned drone attacks into Quetta.

In a weekend report, The New York Times said McChrystal's additional troop request, which has not been made public, could go up to 40,000.

The new developments also come in the midst of debates on setting a timeline for an exit strategy from Afghanistan.

Those who oppose it say withdrawal would only help bring the Taliban back in control and open the way for al-Qaida to re-establish its sanctuaries.

Those who support it say the Taliban already controls much of Afghanistan and that al-Qaida will no longer need Afghanistan as a sanctuary as it already has such havens in Pakistan's tribal regions and in places like Somalia.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates, speaking to CNN's "State of the Union," disagreed with setting a timetable for exit from Afghanistan.

"(The) Taliban and al-Qaida, as far as they're concerned, defeated one superpower (the Soviet Union). For them to be seen to defeat a second, I think, would have catastrophic consequences in terms of energizing the extremist movement, al-Qaida recruitment, operations, fundraising, and so on. I think it would be a huge setback for the United States."

On troop additions, the secretary said, "Once we're confident we have the strategy right, then -- then we'll address the question of additional resources."

As for the growing debate on his report, McChrystal welcomes it.

In a telephone interview with The New York Times, he said he had total freedom to put in "a candid assessment" and that the report was not designed to create any rift between the administration and the U.S. military.

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
News From Across The Stans



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Obama: Afghan war not just a US battle
Washington (AFP) Sept 29, 2009
US President Barack Obama Tuesday warned America could not fight the battle in Afghanistan alone, as he met NATO chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen and began deliberations on whether to escalate the war. "This is not a American battle, this is a NATO mission as well," Obama said as he welcomed the alliance's secretary general to the Oval Office, at a time of mounting political pressure over future ... read more







The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2009 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement