. Military Space News .
Military Matters: Hope for Afghanistan

The action of the Saudi government in sponsoring talks between Afghan President Hamid Karzai's regime and the Taliban is something the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization should welcome and support. As quickly as it can without upsetting the applecart, the United States should also start to talk with the Taliban.
by William S. Lind
Washington (UPI) Oct 22, 2008
As the military situation in Afghanistan deteriorates, there may be at least the possibility of better news on the political front.

"NightWatch" for Oct. 7 reported: "Multiple news services have reported meetings hosted by Saudi Arabian King Abdullah between representatives of the Kabul government and the Taliban. Both Taliban and Afghan government spokesmen have denied that the talks were official. Both have acknowledged that talks occurred. ... Mediated talks between enemies accompanied by denials always signify the first step toward power sharing."

Intervening powers seldom if ever win Fourth Generation wars militarily, though they may lose them militarily. Rather, if they win, which means they witness the re-emergence of a state, they do so politically.

Here we see what might be called the "Afghan Advantage." Unlike most Fourth Generation situations, including Iraq, in Afghanistan we face one predominant enemy, the Taliban. That means the United States will have someone to negotiate with who can actually deliver, and can do so on a country-wide scale.

Usually any "deal" in a Fourth Generation war environment can only be local. The local sheik, clan leader, gang leader or militia captain can deliver only in his own back yard. Foreign occupiers must try to assemble, then maintain, a fragile, endlessly complex network of local deals, most of which tend to unravel. Ceasing to juggle leads not to stability but to the collapse of all deals and a return to chaos. That is one reason why occupiers find they cannot get out.

The situation in Afghanistan is more favorable. If we can make a deal with the Taliban, they can enforce it throughout most of the country. They can speak for the Pashtun, the people with whom the United States is at war. The United States can get out without Afghanistan falling back into chaos. The Taliban have shown they can govern, even to the point of shutting down the opium trade.

The action of the Saudi government in sponsoring talks between Afghan President Hamid Karzai's regime and the Taliban is something the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization should welcome and support. As quickly as it can without upsetting the applecart, the United States should also start to talk with the Taliban.

As the "NightWatch" report indicated, the obvious direction of the talks should be toward some sort of power-sharing. That will only be a temporary arrangement; the Pashtun, Uzbeks and Tajiks will sort out their differences in the usual way, by fighting.

But an Afghan coalition government that includes the Taliban could give the United States and NATO what they need: an opportunity to get out. It is not too difficult to envision how such a government might be put together.

The Taliban would get some seats in the Afghan Cabinet meeting in the capital, Kabul, and control over the provinces they regard as their homeland. They would promise not to invite al-Qaida to set up new bases in Afghanistan. Al-Qaida now has no need for Afghan bases, since it has better ones in Pakistan, the country that is its current strategic focus.

Karzai would be expelled from power in Kabul, possibly much to his own relief, no doubt, perhaps to be replaced by a restored monarchy. The monarchy was popular in Afghanistan and would be accepted by most Afghans as a legitimate government.

Pipe dreams of a democratic, secular, modern Afghanistan would vanish, as pipe dreams always do. The United States and NATO would get out of Afghanistan without suffering an obvious defeat. In the history of Afghan wars, that is the best outcome an invader can hope for.

As Winston Churchill said, "Better 'jaw, jaw' than 'war, war.'"

-- (William S. Lind, expressing his own personal opinion, is director of the Center for Cultural Conservatism at the Free Congress Foundation.)

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
News From Across The Stans



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Nine Afghan troops killed in international air strike
Kabul (AFP) Oct 23, 2008
An air strike by international forces mistakenly killed nine Afghan soldiers on Wednesday, the defence ministry said, in the latest in a string of errors to hit the campaign against Taliban militants.







  • French minister opposes Georgia, Ukraine entry to NATO
  • Outside View: China's silent dominance
  • A Revolution In Russian Military Affairs Part One
  • Russian Military Machine Running On Fumes Part Two

  • Russia launches 31-year-old Stiletto missile
  • McCain raises specter of nuclear war
  • Nuclear incident would make 9/11 'insignificant': nuke commission
  • Iranian Pilots Show Off Dogfighting Skills In War Games

  • US Navy Launches Raytheon Tomahawk Block IV From Submarine
  • Army And LM Support Second Successful International PAC-3 Missile Test
  • Russia denies missile sales to Iran
  • NKorea prepares mass missile launches: reports

  • Russia Sends Out The Nuke Bombers For Week Long Exercises
  • Russia sees no point to more US missile talks: report
  • Russia expects access to US defence shield in Czech Republic: reports
  • Swords and Shields: Russia shields Syria

  • Energy Department has high school contest
  • Researchers Scientists Perform High Altitude Experiments
  • Airbus expecting 'large' China order by early 2009: CEO
  • Airbus globalises production with China plant

  • DCNS Achieves Automatic UAV Landing On Frigate
  • Successful Live-Fire Testing Of Shadow TUAS
  • AAI Receives Contract For Additional Shadow TUAS
  • TAAC 2008 Unmanned Aircraft Systems Conference

  • US, Iraq will get security pact 'worked out,' Rice says
  • Iran wants to undermine US-Iraq troops deal: Pentagon
  • Iran says US-Baghdad pact harms Iraq sovereignty
  • Iraq says will not be bullied into signing US pact

  • Raytheon Receives Contract For Development Of Excalibur 1b
  • Raytheon Receives Contract For Production Of Towed Decoys
  • Smart Bombs Score Another Hit In Extended Range Tests
  • Raytheon Air-to-Air Missile Enters Weapons System User Program

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement