. Military Space News .




.
THE STANS
NATO-Pakistan relations hit new low
by Staff Writers
Washington (UPI) Nov 28, 2011

Obama sees Pakistani deaths as tragedy: spokesman
Washington (AFP) Nov 28, 2011 - President Barack Obama sees the deaths of 24 Pakistani soldiers in a NATO raid as a tragedy, the White House said Monday, while stressing that US-Pakistani ties were vital to both sides.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said Obama believed Saturday's attack, which threw strained relations into fresh turmoil, was "a tragedy," adding that "we mourn those brave Pakistani service members that lost their lives."

"We take this matter very seriously," said Carney, adding that two separate probes -- one by NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan, the other by US Central Command -- would examine what took place.

"As for our relationship with Pakistan, it continues to be an important cooperative relationship that is also very complicated," Carney said.

"It is very much in America's national security interest to maintain a cooperative relationship with Pakistan because we have shared interests in the fight against terrorism."

Pakistan earlier vowed no more "business as usual" with the United States, but stopped short of threatening to break the troubled alliance altogether.

NATO and the United States are trying to limit fallout from the attack, but Islamabad has shut vital supply routes to the 140,000 foreign troops serving in Afghanistan.

US State Department deputy spokesman Mark Toner said "we're concerned about the impact of this incident on our relations with Pakistan," which he said had yielded results in fighting Islamist militancy.

He also said "this is a relationship that has weathered significant setbacks.... I don't think anyone can deny that.

"But it's one that's also, through every challenge and through every setback, has moved forward because it's so vitally important to both our countries."

Toner also said the United States understood that Islamabad was "reconsidering" whether to attend the international conference in Bonn.

He urged Islamabad to attend, saying it was "very much in the interests of Pakistan."

Pakistan called the NATO strike "unprovoked," worsening US-Pakistani relations that have been in crisis since US special forces killed Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden on Pakistani soil in May with no prior warning.

The Wall Street Journal, following a similar report by Britain's Guardian newspaper, cited three Afghan officials and one Western official as saying Saturday's air raid was called in to shield allied forces targeting Taliban fighters.

NATO and Afghan forces "were fired on from a Pakistani army base," the unnamed Western official told the Journal. "It was a defensive action."

An Afghan official said the Kabul government believes the fire came from the Pakistani military base -- and not from insurgents. Afghan-Pakistani relations suffer from routine mutual recriminations.


The United States and NATO are in a new row with Pakistan after coalition aircraft killed as many as 28 Pakistani soldiers along the Pakistan-Afghan border.

Reports say the soldiers were killed early Saturday after a joint Afghan-International Assistance Force operation against Taliban insurgents received gunfire from the direction of a Pakistani border post and called in airstrikes.

Islamabad called the airstrikes by jets and helicopters "unprovoked," a violation of national sovereignty, and immediately retaliated: Two border crossings used by ISAF convoys carrying supplies to coalition troops in Afghanistan were closed, stranding some 300 vehicles.

About 40-50 percent of non-lethal supplies -- including fuel -- for international forces in Afghanistan pass through the Torkham crossing in the northwest Khyber tribal area of Pakistan and Chaman, in southwestern Baluchistan province.

Pakistan also ordered the United States to vacate within 15 days an airbase in the country that U.S. forces use for servicing unmanned aerial vehicles that conduct surveillance and attack missions against Afghan insurgents in the ill-defined border areas.

"The attack was unprovoked and indiscriminate," said Pakistani army spokesman Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas. "There was no reason for it. Map references of all our border posts have been passed to NATO a number of times."

The Pakistanis say the outpost was clearly marked, had a flag flying and that no gunfire came from it or the surrounding area.

Predictably, anti-U.S. and anti-NATO demonstrations erupted throughout Pakistan, where anger is ever-present over continued American UAV strikes in Pakistan's border tribal areas against Taliban insurgent hideouts and over Washington's unilateral raid on the Pakistan hideout of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden in May.

Although Pakistan is an ally in the war against terrorism and is itself targeted by Islamist extremists, it is accused of turning a blind eye to Taliban groups that fight in Afghanistan but use Pakistan's border areas as safe havens. Earlier this year, outgoing Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Michael Mullen publically said he believed Pakistan's powerful intelligence service gives aid to Afghan insurgents fighting the United States, NATO and the Kabul government.

The public accusation, together with the bin-Laden raid, has brought U.S.-Pakistan relations to its lowest ebb.

NATO called the airstrike Saturday a "tragic, unintended incident" and has launched an investigation into it. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta apologized for the incident and expressed condolences to the families of the dead Pakistani soldiers. They also supported the NATO investigation.

"My most sincere and personal heartfelt condolences go out to the families and loved ones of any members of Pakistan security forces who may have been killed or injured," added U.S. Marine Corps Gen. John Allen, commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan.

But Pakistani sensitivities are unlikely to be soothed any time soon and meanwhile tons of supplies used by U.S. and coalition forces in Afghanistan are sitting in trucks at vulnerable crossing points along the Pakistan-Afghan border.

Insurgents last year blew up more than 100 convoy vehicles at the border while they were waiting to cross.

It is believed the delay in transporting the supplies won't affect ISAF forces for the time being. They have reportedly stockpiled enough non-lethal supplies to last several months. But if Pakistan were to permanently sever the links, then U.S. and NATO forces would have to rely on the northern supply route that passes through Russia and Central Asia.

Lethal equipment -- munitions, for example -- wouldn't be affected since they are flown into Afghanistan.

Pakistan once before closed a border crossing to NATO after two of its soldiers were killed by a U.S. helicopter but soon reopened. A joint Pakistan-U.S. investigation determined the Pakistanis had fired at the helicopter, possibly as a warning to the aircraft that it had strayed into Pakistani territory.

Ironically, Allen had met the day before the latest incident with Pakistani Chief of Army Staff Gen. Ashfaq Pervez Kayani over border-control issues.

Coalition troops frequently complain of receiving fire from insurgents on the Pakistani side of the Afghan border. Whatever the outcome of the latest incident, with the end of NATO presence in Afghanistan still years away, Saturday's incident is unlikely to be the last.

Related Links
News From Across The Stans




.
.
Get Our Free Newsletters Via Email
...
Buy Advertising Editorial Enquiries




US vows to 'carry on' after Pakistan cuts supplies
Washington (AFP) Nov 28, 2011 - The United States will press ahead with its war effort in Afghanistan despite Pakistan's decision to cut off supplies to NATO-led forces after lethal air strikes, the Pentagon said Monday.

Pakistan promptly sealed its border with Afghanistan to NATO supply convoys after allied strikes on Saturday killed 24 Pakistani soldiers near the border, triggering outrage in Islamabad.

But a Pentagon spokesman said the US military would not scale back its operations against Taliban-linked insurgents and expressed hope that the latest tensions with Islamabad would be resolved.

"The war effort continues," press secretary George Little told reporters.

Asked how long US and coalition forces could operate without supplies from routes running through Pakistan, he said: "I don't have a time line to share.

"But the important point to focus on is the war effort will continue. Everyone realizes we have an enemy to engage in Afghanistan and the US military is prepared to carry on."

Nearly half of all cargo bound for NATO-led troops runs through Pakistan. Roughly 140,000 foreign troops, including about 97,000 American forces, rely on supplies from the outside for the ten-year-old war in Afghanistan.

The United States also depends on Islamabad's tacit cooperation to wage war against Al-Qaeda and Taliban militants inside Pakistan, with the CIA carrying out an intense campaign of air strikes using unmanned drone aircraft.

After the air strikes, Pakistan's cabinet ministers and military chiefs ordered the United States to leave within 15 days an air base used for drone strikes against militants inside Pakistan.

The remote Shamsi air field in southwest Pakistan is reportedly used as a hub for covert CIA drone strikes, which Islamabad previously told the United States to leave in June.

The role of the air base remains unclear as the CIA also uses air fields in neighboring Afghanistan to stage missile attacks with unmanned robotic planes against suspected Al-Qaeda and Taliban militants.

US officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said President Barack Obama's administration was working on a response to a number of demands from Pakistan but gave no indication the drone operations would be dramatically cut back.

"Pakistan remains a critical counter terrorism partner, and we do not anticipate significant changes in that relationship," a US official told AFP.

The Pentagon said top government officials and commanders are working with the Pakistanis "on a way ahead" following the air strikes, which triggered outrage in Pakistan.

The top US and NATO commander in Afghanistan, General John Allen, has asked US Central Command to lead an investigation into the air strikes, Little said. The American military's Central Command oversees US forces in the Middle East and Afghanistan.

The NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) sent an initial assessment team over the weekend to the border to collect facts surrounding the incident, he said.

Pakistan maintains the air strikes were unprovoked while Afghan and Western officials reportedly say Pakistani forces opened fire first.

The White House called the attack a "tragedy" and stressed Pakistan remained a crucial partner, but officials said it was too early to conclude what led to the incident.

Both General Allen and the US military's top-ranking officer, General Martin Dempsey, spoke to the Pakistani army chief, General Ashfaq Kayani, about the incident, Little said.

"Obviously they did express their condolences and regrets but I think everyone realizes the facts need to be collected, analyzed and that the investigation needs to unfold," he said.



.

. Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle



THE STANS
Pakistan steps up rhetoric over lethal NATO raid
Islamabad (AFP) Nov 28, 2011
Pakistan vowed no more "business as usual" with the United States after NATO strikes killed 24 Pakistani soldiers, but stopped short Monday of threatening to break the troubled alliance altogether. NATO and the United States had sought to limit the fallout of Saturday's attack as Pakistan shut vital supply routes to the 140,000 foreign troops serving in Afghanistan and ordered a review of it ... read more


THE STANS
Medvedev threatens missile deployment on EU borders

Boeing and Northrop Grumman GMD Team Statement on Competitive Missile Defense Contract

Iran 'builds own missile defense system'

Northrop Grumman Plays Key Role in Unprecedented Joint Service Air and Missile Defense Demonstration

THE STANS
MEADS Conducts First Flight Test At White Sands Missile Range

General killed in Iran blast 'was working on missiles'

Arms blast death toll rises to at least 36: Iran media

India: more AWACS and BrahMos missiles

THE STANS
Argus One UAV Completes Flight Testing With New Pod Bay and Propulsion System

Kratos on Winning Team to Provide Army Unmanned Aerial System Technical Support

US drone kills six militants: Pakistani officials

Lockheed Martin Wins Major Contract From US Army To Maintain Aerostat Detection Systems

THE STANS
Raytheon First to Successfully Test With On-Orbit AEHF Satellite

Lockheed Martin AMF JTRS Team Demonstrates Communications and Tactical Data Sharing At Army Exercise

Boeing Ships WGS-4 to Cape Canaveral for January Launch

Harris to maintain satellite ground system

THE STANS
New Weapon for Australian Soldiers

Cambodia landmine summit sparks hopes for survivor

Elbit Systems Awarded Order for Driving Trainers Israeli MOD

Lockheed Martin Completes Assembly Of The First International F-35 For UK

THE STANS
Contest for $1 billion jet deal heats up

S. African paper publishes 'sealed' arms deal interview

Mercosur mulls focus on arms suppliers

Debt deal failure looms over US military strategy

THE STANS
India-China meeting off over Dalai Lama: source

In Myanmar trip, US seeks clout on China doorstep

Perry says China's communists doomed, lack virtue

Three-way US-China drills possible: Australia

THE STANS
Rheinmetall demonstrates laser weapons

LockMart Directed Energy Leader Receives Purdue's Outstanding Aerospace Engineer Award


.

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2011 - Space Media Network. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement