. Military Space News .
Neocons Become Neoliberals As Israel Prepares For New Admin

disclaimer: image is for illustration purposes only
by William S. Lind
Washington (UPI) Jan 8, 2009
While the world's eyes are fixed on the U.S. presidential inauguration of Barack Obama on Jan. 20, another election with equal importance for the future of the United States is looming in Israel three weeks later.

Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni failed in her efforts in November to form a new Israeli coalition government and called for elections. They will be held Feb. 10, and Israeli opinion polls have put the nationalist Likud Party led by former Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu firmly in the lead over the two current coalition partners, Livni's own Kadima Party and the venerable Labor Party led by Defense Minister and former Prime Minister Ehud Barak.

If Netanyahu and his Likud Party win, as is still generally expected, it will mean as much for the United States as for Israel. Why? Because the U.S. government's Middle Eastern policy is effectively the tail on Likud's dog. Many American neoconservatives, those great guys who gave us the war in Iraq, are de facto members of Likud. Several leading American neocons wrote Likud's strategy for Israel, which calls for the destruction of every Middle Eastern country that could be a threat to Israel. The U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003 represented in part that strategy being put into effect.

Those who imagined that President-elect Barack Obama's victory on Nov. 4 would result in the neocons being shown the door are in for an unpleasant surprise. Under the guise of neoliberals, they are no less influential in the Democratic establishment than in the Republican one.

The only way Likud could get shut out of a Democratic administration would be if Obama had bypassed the whole establishment in choosing his foreign and defense policy appointments. And he did not.

Like figures on a medieval clock, the Republican and Democratic establishments succeed each other in an unbroken chain of policy failure.

A Likud government in Israel come next spring would make two wars virtually certain: a war between Israel and Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed Shiite Party of God in southern Lebanon, and a war between Israel and Iran.

The Israeli military leadership recently announced that in the event of another war with Hezbollah, Israel would destroy Lebanon's civilian infrastructure throughout the country. Since the neolibs will make certain that the United States backs Israel to the hilt, worldwide Islamic anger over the unnecessary destruction of a small, helpless Middle Eastern country, at least a third of whose people are Christians, will focus as much on the United States as on Israel.

Islamic Fourth Generation War organizations will get a huge boost to their recruiting and fundraising, while the legitimacy of Islamic states with ties to the United States will be further weakened.

Even worse, an Israeli attack on Iran, in turn, could bring about the loss of the army that the United States still keeps deployed in Iraq.

(Part 2: The danger of out-of-control wars across the Middle East)

(William S. Lind, expressing his own personal opinion, is director of the Center for Cultural Conservatism at the Free Congress Foundation.)

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
The Military Industrial Complex at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


South African Arms Industry Gets Cosy With China
Hong Kong (UPI) Jan 8, 2009
China has had a number of dealings with South African weapons manufacturers over the past decade, most of which have not resulted in actual weapons purchases. However, several recent Chinese-made military technologies bear suspicious resemblances to their South African counterparts.







  • China, US upbeat on future of bilateral relationship
  • Walker's World: Sarkozy and the Britons
  • Military Matters: Russian ally -- Part 2
  • China's Hu tells Bush Sino-US ties will remain strong: govt

  • Obama to face Iran nuclear crisis in first year, ex US official warns
  • Panel warns of weakness in US nuclear deterrent
  • China and US should use pressure, not diplomacy, with North Korea
  • North Korea nuclear ambitions will test Obama: official

  • Taiwan not impressed by reported Chinese plan to withdraw missiles
  • Javelin Joint Venture Awarded Contract For Command Launch Unit Upgrade
  • NLOS-LS Completes Third Test Flight Of Precision Attack Missile
  • Russian Military Confirms 13 Strategic Missile Launches For 2009

  • Pentagon denies missile defense sales talks with India
  • BMD Watch: New missile for S-400 Triumf
  • Moscow Says Offer To On Joint Radar Use Still Stands
  • What Motivates Iran And Russia On The S-300 Deal Part Two

  • Cathay Pacific books 7.6 billion HK dollar loss over oil hedging
  • India signs 2.1 bln dollar plane deal with Boeing
  • China Eastern says bailout increased to one billion dollars
  • Britain's environment minister concerned by Heathrow plan

  • Skylark 1 LE Selected By Israeli Ministry Of Defense
  • Russia mulls unprecedented Israel drones purchase
  • Raven UAS Certified By Italian Ministry Of Defense
  • Navy Targets Unmanned Aircraft

  • US hands over Green Zone security to Iraq
  • Feature: Hunting weapons in Iraqi dung
  • Key dates in Iraq's political transition
  • Iraq signs military accords with Britain, Australia

  • Leveraging Airlift For Force Projection
  • Tank Warfare In The Gaza Battlefield
  • Thompson Files: F-22 deterrent
  • Elbit Systems And IAI To Supply Turkey Combined Airborne Imagery Intelligence Systems

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement