. | . |
No end in sight as anti-IS campaign enters third year By Thomas WATKINS Washington (AFP) Aug 8, 2016
The US-led military effort against the Islamic State group started exactly two years ago, aimed at halting the jihadists as they swept across Iraq, leaving a trail of human butchery and destruction in their wake. It was supposed to have been a swift and narrow campaign that would help local forces deal a "lasting defeat" to IS jihadists. But billions of dollars and more than 14,000 air strikes later, such assertions are buckling, and the campaign highlights the limits of fighting a war mainly from the skies. "I think we are looking at decades of effort," said Charles Lister, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute. "We are fighting a losing battle if we expect to completely destroy (IS) altogether." Nearly half of the territory once held by the IS group in Iraq has been liberated, as well as about 20 percent of its claim in neighboring Syria. Experts foresee the eventual collapse of the group's self-declared "caliphate," but the jihadists are fighting back by calling on followers to launch attacks across the globe. Just this year, IS has claimed a string of horrific attacks including in France, Belgium, Turkey, Baghdad and the United States. "This is an organization that has very successfully morphed back into a traditional terrorist organization that then steadily rebuilds its capabilities," Lister said. - US boots on the ground - When President Barack Obama launched air strikes in Iraq in August 2014, officials stressed US involvement would not be sustained for the long term. And Obama, elected on a promise of ending America's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, vowed ground troops would not be dragged back into another conflict. He has repeatedly insisted that while the United States can provide support and air strikes, the war has to be won by local forces -- not Americans. Still, about 6,500 coalition troops -- mostly American -- have deployed in the anti-IS fight. Most are in Iraq, though some special operations forces are working with Kurdish and Arab fighters in war-torn Syria, where a civil war and Russian strikes in support of President Bashar al-Assad have further complicated the picture. "The few people of us who were watching this group develop from 2010 to 2014 knew very well that this was going to be a very long-term battle, and the idea that no US troops were going to be involved was just a fantasy," Lister told AFP. Though the United States claims more than 60 countries are part of its coalition, in reality America and just a few stalwart partners are carrying out almost all the work. Within weeks of the first strikes in Iraq, the coalition campaign spread to Syria. The fight later expanded to Afghanistan and, last week, the Pentagon quietly started an air campaign in the IS group's Libyan stronghold of Sirte. That campaign is supposed to last "weeks, not months," according to the Pentagon. - Civilian deaths - In total, the US-led coalition had conducted 14,301 strikes in Iraq and Syria as of August 6. A total of 9,514 of the strikes were in Iraq and 4,787 in Syria. The daily cost for such operations is about $11.9 million -- around $8 billion so far. Coalition strikes have targeted jihadi leaders, foot soldiers, tanks and fighting positions. Fuel trucks and well heads that supply illicit oil for the IS group have been blown up too, along with hoards of cash worth millions of dollars. But such reliance on air strikes has created new problems, with the campaign's quickening pace leading to increasing numbers of civilians being killed. As of July 28, the Pentagon had confirmed 55 civilians killed in coalition strikes in Iraq and Syria. Critics say that is an underestimate. Other incidents are under investigation, including a July strike near the Syrian city of Manbij in which dozens more civilians were allegedly killed. Though the United States goes to great lengths to avoid such deaths, they have disastrous repercussions for the wider fight against IS jihadists, observers note. "With the bombing campaigns, you are going to kill innocents, you are going to drive more recruits and you are going to drive more sympathy," said Howard Gambrill Clark, a Marine veteran and former senior intelligence analyst who now heads the Washington-based Stability Institute. "I don't know any serious (counterterrorism) analyst that believes that the US is doing anything but creating more violent extremists," he said.
Two years of anti-IS strikes in numbers IS overran large areas north and west of Baghdad in 2014 and seized significant territory in northern and eastern Syria amid the chaos of that country's civil war, declaring a cross-border "caliphate". In Syria, coalition-backed Kurdish and Arab anti-IS forces defeated the jihadists in the city of Kobane and recaptured the city of Tal Abyad and the town of Manbij and have pledged to retake Raqa, the jihadists' de facto Syrian capital. Iraqi forces have retaken the cities of Tikrit, Ramadi and Fallujah and have now set their sights on ousting IS from Nineveh province and its capital Mosul, the country's second city. In addition to air strikes, the coalition has provided advice, training and other assistance to anti-IS forces in both countries. Meeting in Washington last month, top diplomatic and military officials from coalition countries discussed plans that Pentagon chief Ashton Carter said would deliver a "lasting defeat" to IS. Here are some key figures from the coalition on operations against IS: 14,301: The total number of strikes carried out by the coalition from the beginning of the campaign to August 6. A total of 9,514 of the strikes were in Iraq and 4,787 in Syria. Coalition strikes have played a major role in Iraqi advances and have assisted anti-IS forces in Syria. 19,000-25,000: IS fighters estimated to be operating in Iraq and Syria. This compares to an estimated 20,000 to 31,500 in 2014. 55: The number of civilians the United States has confirmed were killed in coalition strikes in Iraq and Syria as of July 28. Twenty-nine civilians have been confirmed as injured. Some observers believe civilian casualties have been significantly higher. 5: The number of "combat-related deaths" of international coalition military personnel. Two Americans died of wounds sustained in firefights with IS, while rocket fire left a third dead. IS also burned a Jordanian pilot to death in a cage in Syria, while Iraqi Kurdish forces mistakenly killed a Canadian. 47: The percentage of territory IS has lost in Iraq, according to US Special Envoy Brett McGurk. The jihadists are thought to have lost around 20 percent of territory they once held in Syria. 6,500: The approximate number of coalition forces deployed in support of operations against IS. Most are in Iraq, but some have also been sent to Syria. Some have directly fought IS militants, but most are in training or advisory roles. 13: Coalition countries carrying out strikes against IS in Iraq, Syria or both. They are: Australia, Bahrain, Belgium, Britain, Canada, Denmark, France, Jordan, The Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and the United States. 7.7 billion: The total cost in dollars of US operations against IS from the start of strikes to May 31 this year.
Related Links The Long War - Doctrine and Application
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |