. Military Space News .
Outside View: EADS tanker woes -- Part 2

disclaimer: image is for illustration purposes only
by Antonio Gil Morales
Washington (UPI) Jun 18, 2008
Compared to Boeing's KC-767, the European Aeronautic Defense and Space Co.'s KC-30 air tanker is easier to attack in combat, would occupy more space at military airports, requires extensive facility renovations, provides less flexibility in major military operations, and burns far more fuel.

And according to an independent study, the EADS KC-30 tanker would cost taxpayers some $30 billion in extra fuel costs and at least another $12 billion in new infrastructure upgrades to accommodate its oversize frame.

For the most part, military experts and news organizations have searched for an explanation as to why the U.S. Air Force would uncharacteristically tilt the playing field in favor of a foreign contractor with an arguably more expensive, less capable aircraft that is paid for by illegal subsidies.

Most commentators point to the hefty lobbying campaign of EADS and its congressional allies in Alabama -- the one state where EADS will throw a couple thousand jobs for "final assembly."

Indeed, news reports have widely cited the influence of the EADS lobbying campaign, pointing to several midcourse changes in the contract award process that unarguably favored EADS.

For example, the U.S. Air Force suddenly discounted the disadvantages of the KC-30's oversized frame, its higher costs and its lack of a proven track record. EADS was also exempted from critical export control laws that will allow it to use its cozy relationships with Iran and Venezuela; it may be able to even export technologies to these rogues developed with U.S. taxpayer financing.

But economic experts now say that by buckling in to EADS' backroom dealings, the U.S. Air Force inadvertently could have set back the primacy of the U.S. aerospace industry by decades.

Ironically, it seems as if the U.S. Air Force, perhaps inadvertently, is advancing the very goal of the illegal EU subsidy program that the U.S. Trade Representative and the bipartisan congressional leadership have been fighting.

It's not just that we are exporting 44,000 manufacturing jobs to Europe, whose shores were protected for generations by planes built by American manufacturers. We are outsourcing the most advanced aerospace industry in the world to a European Union that has declared war on our industrial base with illegal subsidies and thumb-nosing protectionism in their own government contracts.

If it were a book, it would be titled, "While the Pentagon Slept."

(Antonio Gil Morales is national commander of the American GI Forum of the United States. The American GI Forum is a congressionally chartered veterans organization representing the interests of more than 1.3 million veterans of Hispanic descent who have defended the United States in almost every major war of the 20th century and continue to risk their lives in the struggle against terrorism.)

(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
The Military Industrial Complex at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Democrats lash McCain over Boeing tanker row
Washington (AFP) June 18, 2008
The Democratic Party Wednesday turned new controversy over an Air Force tanker deal into a searing election attack on Republican White House hopeful John McCain.







  • Walker's World: France's new military
  • China has no plans to 'encircle' India: ambassador
  • Japanese warship to visit China next week: minister
  • G8 holds first science summit

  • Crunch talks on India-US nuclear deal postponed
  • China urges NKorea to move forward nuclear talks: report
  • Outside View: Nuke weapons cleanup
  • Iran says will 'never' suspend enrichment: report

  • Raytheon Delivers 1,000th Tomahawk Block IV Cruise Missile To US Navy
  • Russia Destroys 20 Ballistic Missiles In 2008 Under START Treaty
  • Analysis: Missiles aimed at Taiwan
  • Lockheed Martin Receives 90 Million Dollar MLRS Launcher Contract

  • BMD Focus: Will Lithuania host BMD base?
  • US does not exclude Lithuania as alternate missile site
  • The Russian US ABM Deadlock Continues Part Two
  • US to press NATO allies on missile defence options

  • The Tu-144: The Future That Never Was
  • China's new jumbo-jet firm no threat to Airbus, Boeing: state media
  • China unveils new jumbo jet company: report
  • NASA And JAXA To Conduct Joint Research On Sonic Boom Modeling

  • Rockwell Collins Controls And Lands Wing-Damaged UAV
  • Predator, Reaper Unit Becomes Air Expeditionary Wing
  • UK Defence Committee Enquiry Into ISTAR And Role Of UAVs
  • Boeing Awarded Navy Contract For ScanEagle Services

  • Iraq says deadline for Shiite fighters 'successful'
  • Analysis: USAF counterinsurgency, Part 2
  • Analysis: Iraq's Angel of Light goes home
  • Analysis: USAF counterinsurgency, Part 1

  • Wind Tunnel Tests Contribute To First Flight Of F-35
  • B-52 Presence Demonstrates Global Strike Capabilities
  • BAE Completes Integration Of First NLOS Cannon Prototype
  • Harris Falcon Watch Remote Surveillance System Chosen For Afghan Mission

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement