. Military Space News .
Outside View: Exploring 4Th Gen War



Washington (UPI) Jan 14, 2006
Not surprisingly, the spread of the intellectual framework I call the Four Generations of Modern War has brought forth a host of reinterpreters and critics. Some have added valuable insights, while others have just muddied the waters. In the next On War columns, I will take a look at the work of three commentators who represent three different categories: the good, the bad and the ugly.

The good are represented by Col. Tom Hammes, U.S. Marine Corps retired, author of 'The Sling and the Stone'. I have known Tom Hammes for many years, and he was a major contributor to the Marine Corps' intellectual renaissance of the 1980s and early '90s. 'The Sling and the Stone' offers some excellent descriptions of Fourth Generation war, and it also contributes a very important insight to Fourth Generation theory, namely that speed in the OODA (Observation-Orientation-Decision-Action) Loop may be less important than accuracy of observation and orientation.

Exactly how the OODA Loop works in Fourth Generation conflicts remains an open question; it is possible that Fourth Generation forces can out-cycle state armed forces not by being faster, but by moving so slowly that they are unobservable.

However, there are also some key points where 'The Sling and the Stone' misunderstands Fourth Generation war. One is found in the book's assertion that 4GW is just insurgency. This is much too narrow a definition, and it risks misleading us if we take it to mean that we need only re-discover old counter-insurgency techniques in order to prevail against Fourth Generation opponents.

At the core of 4GW is a crisis of legitimacy of the state, and counter-insurgency cannot address that crisis; indeed, when the counter-insurgency is led by foreign troops, it only makes the local state's crisis of legitimacy worse.

As the Israeli military historian Martin van Creveld has said, what changes in Fourth Generation war is not merely how war is fought, but who fights and what they fight for. 'The Sling and the Stone' does not seem to grasp that these are larger changes than the shift from conventional war to insurgency.

Another error in The Sling and the Stone is its assertion that Fourth Generation war is aimed at breaking the will of an opposing state's decision-makers. In fact, what 4GW forces actually do is something much more powerful: they pull opposing states apart at the moral level.

The issue of "will" derives from a common myth concerning how states make decisions about war or peace. The myth supposes that at some point, a state's decision-makers in effect sit down around a big table and "go over the numbers," as if they were deciding on a hydro-electric project. If the numbers don't add up, they decide it is time to make peace.

Historians long ago recognized that official decisions, including for war or peace, are vastly more complex events in which non-rational factors play decisive roles. In fact, modern decision theory recognizes not only that decisions made by governments do not follow a "rational" business model, neither do most business decisions. Non-rational, often irrational, considerations dominate both.

What Fourth Generation opponents actually do to a state is not play mind-games with the state's leaders, but use the power of weakness to bring the opposing state's whole population to regard the war as an abomination. Paradoxically, the more the state is successful in winning on the battlefield by turning its immense, hi-tech firepower on guys in bathrobes who are armed only with rusty World War II rifles, the more it becomes disgusted with itself. The weaker the Fourth Generation enemy is physically, the stronger he is morally. And the moral level is decisive.

Despite these not insignificant misunderstandings, 'The Sling and the Stone' still represents a good contribution to our developing understanding of Fourth Generation war. There is still a great deal about 4GW that no one yet comprehends, and I am sure Tom Hammes will continue to play a positive role in figuring the whole business out.

William S. Lind, expressing his own personal opinion, is Director for the Center for Cultural Conservatism for the Free Congress Foundation.

United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.

Source: United Press International

Related Links
SpaceDaily
Search SpaceDaily
Subscribe To SpaceDaily Express

Future Combat Program Office Opening In El Paso
St. Louis (SPX) Jan 10, 2006
Boeing and partner Science Applications International, functioning as the Lead Systems Integrator (LSI) for the U.S. Army's Future Combat Systems (FCS) program, have announced the establishment of a new FCS regional office in El Paso, Texas.







  • Rise And Fall Of China In 2005
  • Russia West Had Good Year
  • Japan Says China Considerable Threat
  • Bush Authorizes Export Of Sensitive Equipment To China

  • Analysis: Iran's Course Through U.N.
  • World Powers Threaten Defiant Iran Over Nuclear Crisis
  • Iran Nuclear Row Coming To A Head Says US Official
  • Analysis: Israel 'Can Destroy' Iran Nukes

  • Northrop Grumman Wins Contract For Target And Space-Launch Missile Work
  • LockMart/Netfires Tests Loitering Attack Missile Warhead
  • LockMart Conducts Three Tests Of The GMLRS Unitary Rocket
  • Raytheon Team For APKWS II Demonstrates Semi-Active Laser Sensor Dome Survivability

  • Missile Defense Program Moves Forward
  • ITT To Support DoD Missile Defense Agency
  • Boeing GMD Team Places 10th Interceptor
  • Raytheon Demonstrates Key BMDS Sensor Netting And Integration Capability

  • Northrop Grumman To Provide New Air Data Inertial Reference Units To Lufthansa
  • Air Force Slates F-117 And B-52 For Cuts F-22 Raptors
  • USAF Selects NGC To Provide New, Improved Navigation System For F-16 Fighter
  • Airbus Looks To Lightweight Future

  • USAF UAV Battlelab Sponsors Demo Of Proxy Aviation's SkyForce
  • Northrop Grumman Global Hawk Flies New Electronic Signal Intel Sensor
  • Global Hawk UAV Surpasses 5,000 Combat Flight Hours
  • MachineTalker Mesh Networks In Flight Collecting Wireless Sensor Data On-Board NASA UAVs

  • Did German Spies Help Bomb Iraq?
  • New Year Week Of Blasts In Baghdad
  • Outside View: Our Troops' Unmet Needs
  • New Call To Impeach Blair Over Iraq

  • Outside View: Exploring 4Th Gen War
  • Future Combat Program Office Opening In El Paso
  • Polish Defense Ministry Procures Elisra's EJAB For Its Forces In Iraq
  • LockMart To Provide Sensor Array For Advanced Development Unmanned Undersea Vehicle

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement