. Military Space News .




.
THE STANS
Outside View: 'Out of that damned spot'
by Morgan Strong
Brick, N.J. (UPI) Mar 15, 2012

No change to Afghan 2013 security control aim: Germany
Berlin (AFP) March 15, 2012 - Germany's defence minister said Thursday he did not believe Afghanistan's call to take over control of the nation's security in 2013 rather than 2014 signified a change of direction.

"Afghan President Hamid Karzai is calling for something that is already planned anyway," Thomas de Maiziere told AFP.

He said the plan was already for the handing over of responsibility for security in all provinces to be completed by the middle of 2013.

"Part of this handing-over process is however also to continue looking for a further 12 to 18 months whether this handing-over process is sustainable, is working," De Maiziere said.

So it was correct both to say the process would be completed in 2013, as well as to say the mission would continue until 2014, he added.

But he warned against stressing different parts of the same strategy in order to send a certain message.

"The method (of) 'I have a message for domestic policy' and 'I have a message for the international community', that'll go wrong," he said.

With tensions high after a US soldier killed 16 villagers in a rampage on Sunday, Karzai called Thursday for a transition of the nation's security from NATO control to the Afghan government in 2013 rather than the previous deadline of 2014, after a meeting with visiting US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta.

Germany is the third biggest supplier of troops to the 130,000-strong NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) after the United States and Britain.

It had 4,900 soldiers in Afghanistan as of February 1, but a further 500 are set to be withdrawn by 2013 before the complete pullout.

NATO vows to stick to Afghan plan despite Karzai
Brussels (AFP) March 15, 2012 - NATO vowed Thursday to stick to its plan to finish handing Afghans control of security nationwide by the end of 2014 after the Afghan president called for the switch to be completed a year earlier.

With tensions high after a US soldier killed 16 villagers in a rampage on Sunday, Afghan President Hamid Karzai demanded US troops leave villages and that NATO wrap up the transition in 2013 instead of 2014.

NATO spokeswoman Oana Lungescu said the transition, which started last year, was "making progress" and that allies would "map out how we intend to complete the transition process successfully and responsibly" at a May summit in Chicago.

Lungescu said the alliance remains committed to enabling Afghan forces to take "full responsibility for security as soon as practically possible" without specifying a year.

But she later sent a revised statement adding that the process would take place "according to the timelines established in Lisbon."

NATO leaders agreed at a summit in Lisbon in November 2010 to gradually handover control to the Afghans with the aim of completing the transition by the end of 2014.

"That is why we are working hard to train and develop a professional, capable and sustainable ANSF (Afghan national security force)," Lungescu said.


There are some things that are true and will always remain true. One truth is that you cannot create a modern, secular society from a primitive theocracy, controlled by tribal leaders and war lords, infested with corrupt politicians and drug-trafficking thugs. Add to this toxic misery a violent populace of desperately poor, uneducated, hysterics.

There is no Aristotelian syllogism necessary to prove that Afghanistan is not worthy of any more American lives. The country, if it can truly be called a country, rather more a geographic space lost to time and evolution as the more appropriate description of Afghanistan.

We engaged in Afghanistan to rid ourselves of al-Qaida and the Taliban. Al-Qaida has left Afghanistan because, despite all else, al-Qaida is not a collection of dumb people. They are vicious, treacherous, thuggish, vile things, but are not dumb.

Al-Qaida left and went on to someplace where we are not. The Obama administration must realize they are gone. They went to Pakistan maybe, Somalia maybe, the Sudan maybe, Iraq maybe, Iran maybe.

Wherever they are, they are not in Afghanistan. That much we know, or clearly should know, but might not because we have an intelligence community that could not find al-Qaida with both hands in a hall of mirrors at high noon if al-Qieda were their distended derrieres. And we pay these people good money.

The only thing we are in Afghanistan for now is to decimate the Taliban.

The Taliban remain in distant provinces in formidable defensive positions. We would suffer unacceptable causalities in any attempt to dislodge them, so we cannot and will not make that attempt.

The Taliban will do what the Iranian-sponsored Shiite government in Iraq did. They will lay low, avoid confrontation until we leave, then resurface to take control.

We tried to pave the whole of Afghanistan with the veneer of our civilization and political culture, expanding billions of dollars to train the Afghan police and military and we have failed.

We are absurdly fearful that the Afghan military and police may turn the weapons we supplied them against us even now.

The huge amount of money we have sent to Afghanistan to do these things has largely ended up in the off-shore accounts of its political leadership and their families. The Afghan drug lords have seen their share of the world market for heroin increase tenfold while we vainly attempted to suppress the cultivation of the poppy.

The American defense contractors, and the politicians who lobby for them, have made an astonishing amount of money from this war. They are quite content that we stay in Afghanistan.

The whole of that country is now aflame, first over the desecration of the Koran, now the massacre of 16 civilians, allegedly by an American soldier. The people are doing great violence to Americans who have gone to the place, and risked their lives by going to that place, for their benefit. They have not the courage to see it that way.

They will always regard us as infidels anxious to betray Islam at any opportunity. That belief is fully nurtured by the Taliban and is the most effective weapon the Taliban possess.

This absurdity will never end. We will always stumble into some act to offend, no matter how well-intentioned or how unselfish the Americans who go to Afghanistan may be.

The Taliban are an intuitive part of Afghan society and culture. Like a piece of the genetic code implanted after centuries of blind immersion to the faith. The Taliban seemingly emerge from the Afghan people's genetic blueprint. As much an anticipated growth as is any other physical property of their body's or mind's, it is manifest in their physiological being.

Islam promises the Afghan people the bliss of paradise, after the pain, tedium and endless drudgery of their life on Earth. Life for most Afghans is certainly drudgery. They are impoverished, uneducated, made to suffer all manner of indignities and virtually enslaved to the elite of their society. Who among them would not grasp at any hope?

Islam is that single, in fact only, hope.

Islam in Afghanistan is the absolutism of religion intertwined with the state. Islam is impossible to hold to in a secular democratic society. There is not an example of a society anywhere, at any time, where intellectual and individual discovery is permitted when Islam, in its fundamental form, prevails without conflict. It simply cannot be.

We cannot think to win in Afghanistan. We cannot even hope to survive in Afghanistan.

(Morgan Strong is a former professor of Middle Eastern history and was an adviser to CBS News' "60 Minutes" on the Middle East.)

(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)

Related Links
News From Across The Stans




.
.
Get Our Free Newsletters Via Email
...
Buy Advertising Editorial Enquiries




US plays down Karzai's comments on withdrawal
Abu Dhabi (AFP) March 15, 2012 - US defence officials on Thursday sought to play down calls by Afghan President Hamid Karzai for American forces to withdraw from village outposts, saying Kabul had not requested any change in an agreed timetable for a gradual troop drawdown.

A US official accompanying Defence Secretary Leon Panetta, who arrived in Abu Dhabi after a visit to Afghanistan, told reporters Kabul has agreed with NATO on a schedule for security transition through 2014 and that had not changed.

"Right now there's no reason to think that schedule should change and President Karzai did not ask for any change in the current schedule" in talks earlier Thursday with Panetta, the official said on condition of anonymity.

Panetta's spokesman George Little said the Pentagon chief and Karzai had a "very positive" meeting and that the "issue of villages" came up but in accordance with previously agreed plans laid out at a NATO summit last year in Lisbon.

In Kabul, the Afghan president demanded US troops leave village outposts, just days after an American soldier massacred 16 villagers, and also called for a transition of the nation's security from NATO control to the Afghan government in 2013 rather than the previous deadline of 2014.

But Little said Karzai's statement issued after Thursday's meeting was "consistent" with President Barack Obama's comments on Wednesday that reaffirmed plans for NATO-led forces to hand off to Afghan forces by the end of 2014.

"We don't believe there's a great deal of daylight between the government of Afghanistan and the United States," Little said.

"The secretary (Panetta) believes that the United States and Afghanistan are on the same page with respect to the strategy."

The United States and its NATO allies shared Karzai's desire to see the Afghan government assume full responsibility for the country's security as soon as possible, and the transition is already well underway, he said.

Karzai has often made public comments that have taken the United States and NATO officials by surprise and seemingly strayed from agreed policies.

The reaction of US officials Thursday strongly suggested that Washington hoped Karzai's statement was aimed at a domestic audience for political purposes and did not represent a genuine shift.

The defence official said it was possible that US-led forces would be dramatically scaled back in Afghan villages over the next year under the current security plan, with Afghan troops and police taking over step-by-step.

But the official said full withdrawal from all villages next year would be difficult and not in keeping with the NATO strategy, which is designed to ensure a smooth transfer from foreign troops to local forces.

Asked if US troops could pull out of villages next year under the current plan and still carry out the mission to support Afghan troops and counter insurgents, the official said: "It's not clear that we would be able to."



.

. Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle



THE STANS
Four Polish soldiers face retrial in Afghan war crimes case
Warsaw (AFP) March 14, 2012
Four Polish soldiers face a new war crimes trial after Warsaw's supreme court on Wednesday overturned their acquittal of the killing of Afghan civilians, including women and children, in 2007. The court however confirmed the acquittal of three others, including a base commander, in the case marking the first ever court martial for war crimes involving Polish troops fighting abroad. "The ... read more


THE STANS
Israel lauds its anti-rocket system

US may disclose missile defence data to Russia

Rafael eyes Iron Dome exports after Gaza

Israel sees Gaza rocket fire as part of Iran threat

THE STANS
Lockheed Martin Upgrades Tactical Tomahawk Weapons Control System for Naval Air Systems Command

Raytheon Wins $77.9 Million US Army Missile Subsystem Support Contract

Raytheon Awarded US Army Contract to Counter Rockets

Pakistan test fires short-range ballistic missile

THE STANS
US drone strike kills 5 militants in Pakistan: officials

UUAV conducts 7-hour mission

FAA Starts UAS Test Site Selection Process

Taiwan drone missing

THE STANS
Northrop Grumman Wins Contract for USAF Command and Control Modernization Program

TacSat-4 Enables Polar Region SatCom Experiment

'See Me' satellites may help ground forces

Boeing and Artel to Provide Commercial Satellite Services to US Government

THE STANS
Sweden agrees to ratify cluster bomb ban treaty

New Zealand inducts first NH90 helicopters

Lockheed Martin Receives Sniper Post Production Contract

Boeing and US Army Test Advanced Rotorcraft Flight Control System

THE STANS
Eurocopter India on roll

Canada mulls nixing F-35 purchase

US urged to cancel Russia arms deal over Syria

India's military purchases: Only the best should do

THE STANS
Bo Xilai: China's fallen political star

Pacific big enough for all of us, says China

Indonesia says 'no problem' with US Marines plan

Senior Chinese leader sacked in rare scandal

THE STANS
Touch of gold improves nanoparticle fuel-cell reactions

The shape of things to come: NIST probes the promise of nanomanufacturing using DNA origami

Nanotube technology leading to fast, lower-cost medical diagnostics

2 for 1: Simultaneous size and electrochemical measurement of nanomaterials


Memory Foam Mattress Review

Newsletters :: SpaceDaily Express :: SpaceWar Express :: TerraDaily Express :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

.

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2012 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement