. Military Space News .
Outside View: Strategic lessons -- Part Two

Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
by Douglas Macgregor
Washington (UPI) Aug 8, 2008
Though privately as pro-British as his cousin President Theodore Roosevelt almost 40 years earlier, U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt had no intention of declaring war against Germany on behalf of another state, including Britain. More important, he would not make Woodrow Wilson's mistake and commit millions of Americans to an ideological crusade that promised no tangible strategic benefit to the American people.

Between 1939 and 1942, FDR resisted British Prime Minister Winston Churchill's considerable powers of persuasion, providing only what assistance Britain needed to survive and nothing more. When Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler turned on the Soviet Union, Hitler's closest ally until June 1941, FDR reasoned he could afford the time to build up American strength while the Nazis and communists exhausted themselves in an ideological war of mutual destruction.

Even after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941, FDR declared war only on Japan. FDR had no intention of declaring war on Germany if it could be avoided. It was Hitler who --- in an essentially romantic gesture of solidarity with Japan unanimously opposed by the German General Staff -- declared war on the United States. Even then, FDR's response was calculated.

With Japan's massive armies tied down in China and Southeast Asia, FDR concluded he could wage a naval war in the Pacific that promised far fewer casualties than a land war in Europe. The strategic question was what America could -- indeed, should -- do to fight Hitler?

FDR reasoned that it made no sense to challenge the German war machine on its own terms. That was a job FDR left to Stalin. Instead, FDR avoided German strength and moved his forces through North Africa and Italy, waiting for the combined effect of Soviet offensives and Anglo-American bombing from the air to weaken the Nazi grip on Europe to the point where France could be invaded.

By the time American forces stormed ashore at Normandy, the strategic outcome in Europe was decided. It was left to President Harry S. Truman to finish the job.

Truman was not a man of the world, nor was he well educated. However, Truman knew the American people, their character and their culture.

With hundreds of thousands of American dead and wounded lying on European battlefields, Truman knew there was little hope of reversing Soviet dictator Josef Stalin's gains in Europe.

Truman, like FDR, also knew Americans had no appetite to take the kind of casualties U.S. Gen. Douglas MacArthur predicted the invasion of Japan would entail: namely a million men. Truman dropped the bomb, ended the war and cut the best deal he could with Stalin.

In the years after 1945 Truman sent the millions of Americans who served in the war home and returned the American economy to its pre-war focus -- prosperity. When the 1950-53 Korean War broke out, Truman was taken by surprise. Initially, he took the Joint Chiefs' advice and responded to the North Korean invasion as best he could, but when American forces were trapped in a small pocket around the southeastern port city of Pusan, Truman looked for another solution.

Truman eventually backed MacArthur's plan for a U.S. invasion at the northwestern port of Inchon over the objections of the Joint Chiefs, giving MacArthur the support he needed to execute what is now considered one of the most brilliant maneuvers in military history. However, Truman, who sought to end the war on favorable terms, could not do so after MacArthur's imprudent public challenges to the Chinese. That task was left to his successor, Gen. Dwight David Eisenhower.

(Part 3: Eisenhower's military and economic achievements as America's master strategist)

(Douglas Macgregor is a former Army colonel and a decorated Gulf War combat veteran. He has authored three books on modern warfare and military reform. His latest is "Transformation Under Fire: Revolutionizing the Way America Fights." He writes here for the Straus Military Reform Project at the Center for Defense Information in Washington.)

-- (United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Russia May Put Bombers And Missiles In Belarus
Minsk (AFP) Aug 6, 2008
Russia could base bombers and missiles in neighbouring Belarus in response to US missile defence plans in Eastern Europe, Moscow's ambassador to Minsk said Wednesday, Russian news agencies reported.







  • Outside View: Strategic lessons -- Part Two
  • Russia May Put Bombers And Missiles In Belarus
  • Commentary: Malthus the canary
  • Institute to promote US-China relations inaugurated in Washington

  • Iran nuke showdown -- Part Two
  • Key US lawmaker threatens to hold up India nuclear deal
  • Rice threatens sanctions on Iran over nuclear program
  • UN nuclear watchdog in Tehran talks amid sanctions calls

  • ATK Conducts Successful AARGM Flight Test
  • New AMRAAM Variant Destroys Target During Recent Test
  • Raytheon AMRAAM Contract Enables Warfighters To Maintain Air Superiority
  • NLOS-LS Team Completes First Phase Of PAM Testing

  • LockMart Team Completes Testing Of Propulsion Component On MKV-L
  • BMD Focus: Offshore Scud threat
  • Outside View: BMD deal lessons -- Part 2
  • US considers deploying missile defense radar to Israel

  • NASA evaluates new wing sensor
  • Russia And China May Co-Design New Passenger Plane
  • China Southern Airlines managers take paycut due to oil prices
  • Air China says it is to buy 45 Boeing aircraft

  • Elbit to Equip Australia With Additional Skylark I UAVs
  • Boeing Team Test Short-Wave Infrared Camera On ScanEagle
  • Germany denies Pentagon claim of seeking armed drones
  • Germany, Italy looking to buy armed drones: Pentagon

  • Dogs of War: Contractors vs. genocide?
  • Georgia to withdraw all of its troops from Iraq
  • Outside View: De-mythologizing the surge
  • 'Durable security' near in violent Baghdad district: US commander

  • Force Protection Rolls Out First Ridgback Vehicles For UK MoD
  • ITT Receives Follow-On Order For Systems To Defeat IEDs
  • Soldiers Test FCS Equipment In Culminating Exercise
  • ATK Receives US Army Tank Ammunition Contract

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement