Subscribe free to our newsletters via your
. Military Space News .




WAR REPORT
Palestinian unity government will reject violence: Abbas
by Staff Writers
Ramallah, Palestinian Territories (AFP) April 26, 2014


Hamas official salutes 'positive' Abbas speech
Gaza City, Palestinian Territories (AFP) April 26, 2014 - A senior Hamas official welcomed as "positive" a speech Saturday by Mahmud Abbas, but sidestepped the Palestinian president's pledge that a new Palestinian unity government would recognise Israel and reject violence.

"The speech had mostly positive points, and we cannot but support it on topics such as Jerusalem, reconciliation and not recognising (Israel as) the Jewish state, in addition to the failure of (peace) negotiations," Bassem Naim, an adviser to Hamas' Gaza Strip prime minister Ismail Haniya, told AFP.

Abbas addressed the Palestine Liberation Organisation's Central Council, which had convened in Ramallah to chart a course of action after Israel suspended US-brokered peace talks in response to a Wednesday deal with Islamist movement Hamas.

Under the agreement, Abbas would head an "independent government" of technocrats, to be formed within five weeks.

Israel said it would not negotiate with a government backed by Hamas, which is pledged to the destruction of the Jewish state and has always rejected peace talks.

In his speech, the Palestinian president stressed the new government would follow his principles of recognising Israel, rejecting violence and recognising international commitments.

Abbas said the new government would deal only with internal domestic issues and not be involved in negotiations with Israel, which would remain the responsibility of the PLO.

Naim concurred, saying "it is not the government's mission to take care of political issues. It has only three main missions: unifying the Palestinian organisations, preparing for elections and reconstructing Gaza."

US in 'holding period' in Mideast peace talks
Washington (AFP) April 25, 2014 - Top US diplomat John Kerry does not see his efforts to broker Middle East peace as a failure, but his team is adopting a "holding period" as Israelis and Palestinians decide their next moves, a US official said Friday.

"This is a moment of transition," said State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki. "We can't force the parties to take steps they're unwilling to take."

"We're in a holding period to see what the parties are willing to figure out about what's next."

Kerry's attempts to broker a peace deal by April 29 all but collapsed on Thursday when Israel pulled out of the negotiations, angered by the Palestinian move to form a unity government with the militant Hamas group.

But Psaki denied that Kerry felt he had failed in his efforts since taking office in February 2013 to seal a long-elusive peace treaty.

"He's always said that he believed it was worth it, not just for the United States to engage in this effort as a facilitator or to play any role possible in helping these parties come to the table, but worth it for the parties because the status quo is not sustainable," Psaki told reporters.

"Because the future where there is a two-state solution, where there is greater opportunity, where there is greater economic prosperity, is still in the interest of both people," she insisted.

"And we continue to believe that it's in America's interest as well as Israel's interest and the interests of the Palestinian people to see if we can resolve this conflict."

She revealed that Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas had insisted that any government formed with Hamas "will be his government and represent his policies, and that includes recognition of Israel, commitment to non-violence, adherence to prior agreements and commitment to peaceful negotiations toward a two-state solution."

Abbas's assurances were a "positive thing," Psaki said, but Washington would need to see what happens over the coming weeks.

Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas said Saturday the new unity government he is set to head with the backing of Hamas would reject violence and recognise Israel and existing agreements.

Israel, however, slammed his speech to the Palestine Liberation Organisation's Central Council as a "coup de grace" to the peace process.

The PLO body had convened to chart a course of action after Israel suspended US-brokered peace talks in response to a reconciliation deal with the Islamist Hamas movement.

The agreement between the rival Palestinian factions came as the United States and Israel had hoped to extend the faltering peace talks beyond their April 29 deadline.

Israel said it would not negotiate with a government backed by Hamas, the armed Islamist movement ruling the Gaza Strip, which is pledged to the destruction of the Jewish state and has always rejected peace talks.

"The upcoming government will obey my policy," Abbas told the PLO council.

"I recognise Israel and reject violence and terrorism, and recognise international commitments."

He stressed that the new government itself would not be charged with negotiations, but rather the PLO which "represents the entire Palestinian people".

Efforts to extend hitherto fruitless talks hit a wall last month when Israel refused to release a final batch of Palestinian prisoners.

- 'Recycling the same conditions' -

The Palestinians retaliated by applying to adhere to 15 international treaties as Abbas listed conditions for extending the talks beyond the deadline.

He reiterated these conditions on Saturday, saying Israel must freeze settlement construction in the occupied West Bank and annexed east Jerusalem, free the prisoners and begin discussing the borders of a promised Palestinian state.

Israel, which had already dismissed these same conditions, slammed his speech as tantamount to a "coup de grace to the peace process".

He "recycled the same conditions, after he already knows Israel won't accept them," an Israeli government official said, charging that the Palestinian alliance came "while Israel was making sincere efforts to advance negotiations with the Palestinians".

Israel and Western nations view Hamas as a "terrorist" organisation, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Abbas must choose between reconciling with the Islamist group and negotiating peace.

A senior Hamas official in Gaza praised Abbas's "mostly positive" speech, and concurred with the PLO position that the new government would not be involved in peace talks.

"It is not the government's mission to take care of political issues," Bassem Naim, an adviser to Hamas's Gaza premier Ismail Haniya, told AFP.

"It has only three main missions: unifying the Palestinian organisations, preparing for elections and reconstructing Gaza," he said.

The PLO is the internationally recognised representative of the Palestinians and their interlocutor in peace talks.

The Palestinian Authority (PA) was created as part of the Oslo peace process in the 1990s to administer the occupied Palestinian territories.

Abbas heads both, as well as the secular Fatah party which dominates the PLO.

- No recognition of 'Jewish' state -

Under Wednesday's PLO-Hamas accord, Abbas would head an "independent government" of technocrats, to be formed within five weeks.

That new interim administration would be charged with holding parliamentary and presidential elections within six months of taking office.

Abbas reiterated that the Palestinians would never recognise Israel as the "Jewish state", saying they recognised it as a state in 1993 and should not have to accept its religious identity, which has been a central Netanyahu demand.

He noted that no similar demand was made of Egypt or Jordan when they signed peace treaties recognising Israel.

And he said the Palestinians would refuse a state that did not have east Jerusalem as its capital.

Hamas's Naim said the Abbas "speech had mostly positive points, and we cannot but support it on... not recognising (Israel as) the Jewish state".

The dispute over recognition and Israel's continuing construction of settlements in the occupied territories presented major obstacles to US Secretary of State John Kerry's dogged efforts to coax the two sides towards a historic peace agreement.

"If they (Israel) don't want to commit there is the other solution -- for them to take over everything," Abbas said, implying that a consequence of not renewing talks could be dismantling the PA.

.


Related Links






Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle




Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News





WAR REPORT
Palestinian unity deal faces reality check: analysts
Gaza City, Palestinian Territories (AFP) April 24, 2014
This week's Palestinian reconciliation deal faces a swift reality check, with president Mahmud Abbas the focus of both Israeli fury and US concern and Hamas seeking to salvage relations with Egypt. "Hamas and the Palestinian Authority (PA) had no option but to reconcile," Naji Sharab, a political science professor at Gaza's Al-Azhar University, told AFP. Abbas "realised (peace) negotiati ... read more


WAR REPORT
Russia warns Ukraine against missile technologies proliferation

Japan orders to shoot down any new N Korea ballistic missile launches

US to send two more missile defence ships to Japan: Hagel

Russia's new S-500 system to destroy any target at any altitude

WAR REPORT
International customer signs agreement with USG for Raytheon's TOW missiles

Raytheon awaits FMS order for TOW missiles

GMLRS alternative warhead completes production qualification tests

Raytheon awarded first international contract for Paveway IV

WAR REPORT
Lockheed touts improvements for SUAS operations

Drone strike in Yemen kills 5 'Qaeda' militants: source

NextGen Drone Tracker Kit Now Available

UAV production to remain profitable

WAR REPORT
Harris supplying more communications terminals to Navy

iSYS LLC gets order for cellular wireless managed services

NGC Ships Payload Module For 4th Advanced EHF Protected ComSat

Harris, Exelis win Army radio contract

WAR REPORT
A-T Solutions continues counter-IED work

Lockheed Martin Team's Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Tops 100,000 Testing Miles During EMD Phase

Nexter, Chemring in deal over ammunition manufacturers

Patria vehicles getting Saab communications electronics

WAR REPORT
Saudis seek FMS support deal

Jacobs Engineering acquiring Federal Network Systems

Japan military in popularity push

Bloomberg arms US gun control with $50 mn

WAR REPORT
Kiev announces town 'liberated' but residents dumbfounded

Dispute islands 'within scope' of US-Japan alliance: Obama

Obama in Tokyo backs Japan in China island row

US lifting aid freeze to Egypt

WAR REPORT
The Motion of the Medium Matters for Self-assembling Particles

Never say never in the nano-world

Nanosheets and nanowires

Fabricating Nanostructures with Silk Could Make Clean Rooms Green Rooms




The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.