 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| . |  |
. |
Proposed missile defense upgrade for Taiwan announced
Washington (AFP) Nov 13, 2007 The Pentagon notified the US Congress Tuesday about a possible sale to Taiwan of an upgrade to its Patriot missile defense systems valued at nearly one billion dollars. Even before the announcement, the proposed sale was attacked by China as sending a "wrong signal" to Taiwan and its independence-minded President Chen Shui-bian. The Defense Security and Cooperation Agency said the upgrades would involve ground support equipment of three existing fire units so that they can be armed with the most advanced Patriot interceptor missiles. "The proposed sale will help improve the security of the recipient and assist in maintaining political stability, military balance and economic progress in the region," the DSCA said. The Pentagon estimates that China has nearly 1,000 short range ballistic missiles deployed within striking distance of Taiwan, and is developing other capabilities aimed at preventing outside military intervention in the early days of a cross-straits conflict. In meetings last week with US Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Chinese leaders raised their concerns that Chen intends to move Taiwain toward "de jure" independence through a referendum next year on UN membership. Gates assured President Hu Jintao that the United States was "categorically opposed" to a change of status for Taiwan, but also raised US concerns about China's military buildup. China's foreign ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao said in a statement that the latest Patriot upgrade violated a US commitment to reduce weapons transfers to Taiwan, which Beijing regards as a renegade province. "We urge the US side to implement with real actions its solemn commitments on the Taiwan issue... and stop sending wrong signals to Taiwan," he said. He said the Pentagon announcement constituted "rude interference in China's internal affairs." "The Chinese side strongly protests against this and has raised solemn representations with the United States," Liu said. "The Chinese side reserves the right to adopt further measures," he said without elaborating. China had a similar reaction in September after the Pentagon announced the possible sales to Taiwan of a dozen P-3C Orion anti-submarine patrol aircraft and SM-2 anti-aircraft missiles worth more than 2.2 billion dollars. The Patriot upgrades will for the first time enable the fire units to launch either Patriot Guidance Enhanced Missiles or Patriot Advanced Capability-3 missiles. The GEM missiles use blast fragmentation warheads to destroy an incoming missile, while the PAC-3 uses a "hit-to-kill" warhead that collides with the target. The fire units would get new radios, radars, target identification and remote launch systems, and electric power plants, the DSCA said. The proposed upgrade does not include missiles. "The total value, if all options are exercised, could be as high as 939 million dollars," it said in a statement. The prime contractor will be Raytheon Corporation, of Andover, Massachusetts. Community Email This Article Comment On This Article Related Links Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com All about missiles at SpaceWar.com Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com
Missile Tit-For-Tat
Moscow (RIA Novosti) Nov 13, 2007It looks as if Russia has long guessed the American moves to create a missile defense system in Europe, and is responding tit-for-tat and even figure-for-figure. On November 6, the Americans happily rejoiced after achieving their long-cherished ambition of hitting two target drones at the same time. The Russian reaction was not slow in coming. Russia is now poised to pull out of two basic international treaties on arms limitation. |
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |
