. Military Space News .
Questioning Unbeatable Insurgencies

There are lessons in all these defeats for NATO in Afghanistan. If NATO doesn't prevail and the Taliban sneak in by agreeing to a junior partnership in a broad-based coalition government, the geopolitical consequences would be incalculable. Yet the Taliban are now maneuvering for a Vietnam-style Tet Offensive, this time against Kabul. The United States and NATO are fast approaching decision time to take the war to Taliban's safe bases in FATA, with or without Pakistani consent. A larger aid package than the current $750 million for FATA's 3.5 million people also would have to be voted by the new U.S. Congress.
by Arnaud De Borchgrave
Washington (UPI) Aug 22, 2008
Insurgencies since World War II have worn down their enemies and then prevailed -- with one major exception: Malaya (communist insurgency 1948-1960) before it became Malaysia. Iraq, where the final results will not be known until after U.S. troops leave everything to Iraqi security forces, may become the second.

In 1946 the French in Indochina were up against a communist insurgency in decolonization disguise -- and after eight years of guerrilla warfare were defeated at Dienbienphu in 1954, which clinched victory for North Vietnam's Marxist republic. Six months after Dienbienphu the French army faced a nationalist insurgency in Algeria, which was then an integral part of metropolitan France -- and after eight years of fighting conceded defeat and agreed to the forced exile of 1 million French citizens and the exit of a French army of 500,000.

The United States fought a 10-year guerrilla war in Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos -- and lost to the same Ho Chi Minh-inspired, communist-led insurgency that defeated the French army. The Marxist-led FARC in Colombia is still in business after a half-century of guerrilla warfare, bombings and kidnappings. The Marxist Huks in the Philippines are yet to be defeated after 60 years of battling the central government and before that the Japanese occupation. Hukbalahap, or People's Army Against the Japanese, is still killing an average of one Filipino soldier a day.

In Afghanistan, the Soviet Union fought an insurgency for nine years -- and lost. The United States and its allies have been fighting a Taliban insurgency for the past five years -- and victory now appears to be an ephemeral mirage. For the United States in Vietnam and the French in Algeria, the enemy enjoyed privileged sanctuaries in North Vietnam and in Tunisia. Thus, both insurgencies became unbeatable.

Now the Taliban have the same advantage over U.S. and European forces under NATO command in Afghanistan -- safe havens in Pakistan's seven Federally Administered Tribal Areas along the Afghan border. The local Pashtun population is sympathetic to the Taliban and al-Qaida, while the Pakistani army, about 120,000-strong now in FATA, mostly in static positions along a 1,400-mile Afghan border, loathe an assignment they say smacks of civil war.

Pakistan sans President Pervez Musharraf favors negotiations with their homegrown Taliban extremists, and Pakistani officials, speaking privately, believe the United States also should seek accommodation through talks with "moderate" Taliban elements whose objective would be a coalition government. They also believe Saudi Arabia, once one of three countries that recognized Taliban rule in Kabul in the late 1990s, could be helpful.

Pakistani to-ing and fro-ing on the Taliban reflects a post-Musharraf democratic coalition government trying to get its act together. This, in turn, is a major handicap for U.S. and coalition forces in Afghanistan fighting a Taliban insurgency, which originally was inspired by Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency to put an end to the civil war in the early 1990s that followed the Soviet Union's concession of defeat.

U.S. and allied vulnerabilities are brought home by the Pentagon estimating that "84 percent of all containerized cargo and about 40 percent of all fuel for U.S. and coalition forces operating out of Afghanistan passes through Pakistan," either through the Khyber Pass to Kabul or through Baluchistan to Kandahar.

The beginning of the end for U.S. forces in Vietnam was the 1968 Tet Offensive, which was erroneously interpreted by U.S. and international media as a huge victory for Hanoi's insurgents. Walter Cronkite declared the war lost, and President Johnson decided not to run for re-election. The communist Vietcong hit 36 provincial capitals simultaneously, but they were repulsed everywhere with tremendous losses -- about 45,000 out of 80,000 guerrillas committed -- that forced North Vietnam to dispatch regular army units to replace the Vietcong.

The last U.S. fighting unit left Vietnam in March 1973, and the South Vietnamese army fought on until 1975 when Congress, in a classic case of cutting off its nose to spite its face, decided to cut off all military aid to South Vietnamese and Cambodian allies. Memoirs by North Vietnam's military commanders said they thought they would have to fight on at least another two years before the grand prize of Saigon would be within their grasp. But the congressional decision led them to improvise a general offensive against a now thoroughly demoralized South Vietnamese.

There are lessons in all these defeats for NATO in Afghanistan. If NATO doesn't prevail and the Taliban sneak in by agreeing to a junior partnership in a broad-based coalition government, the geopolitical consequences would be incalculable. Yet the Taliban are now maneuvering for a Vietnam-style Tet Offensive, this time against Kabul. The United States and NATO are fast approaching decision time to take the war to Taliban's safe bases in FATA, with or without Pakistani consent. A larger aid package than the current $750 million for FATA's 3.5 million people also would have to be voted by the new U.S. Congress.

Taliban guerrillas are edging closer to the capital city from three directions. In a probe of Taliban inroads, French paratroopers set off on a recon to the east of the capital and quickly fell into an ambush that killed 10 French fighters and wounded 21, which raises the question of how the Taliban found out about French plans and knew exactly where to prepare a three-sided ambush as night fell. French President Nicolas Sarkozy immediately flew to Afghanistan to bolster morale and pledge unswerving French military support against the Taliban.

In Vietnam, many U.S. operations were known in advance to the enemy through local employees who worked on U.S. bases. The latest Afghan fiasco has all the earmarks of an inside intelligence job. The Taliban's tactical coordination became apparent when 10 suicide bombers mounted a coordinated attack against one of the largest U.S. military bases. Last July nine U.S. soldiers were killed and 15 injured in a surprise attack against a small U.S. base that was abandoned the next day.

To turn Afghanistan into a viable economy beyond the clandestine multibillion-dollar opium poppy-to-heroin traffic requires billions more in aid, which isn't available in the donor-fatigued national parliaments of the coalition. The outgoing NATO commander said at least 400,000 troops would be required to control Afghanistan -- the size of France -- with 30 million people. Current deployment: 60,000.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
News From Across The Stans



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Sarkozy tells French troops in Afghanistan to keep fighting
Kabul (AFP) Aug 20, 2008
President Nicolas Sarkozy on Wednesday told French soldiers mourning 10 comrades killed by the Taliban that their work in Afghanistan was essential for the "freedom of the world" and must continue.







  • India Set To Ramp Up Air Force Part One
  • Russian military cooperation with NATO 'frozen'
  • NATO Dithering On Many Battlefields
  • US: Venezuela's Russia fleet invite is 'curious'

  • North Korea Vows To Bolster War Deterrent As Talks Restart
  • India will not accept conditions to clinch US nuclear deal: report
  • Iran to continue 'positive' nuclear talks with IAEA
  • India nuclear deal could trigger arms race: US lawmakers

  • LockMart Receives US Army Contract For Combat-Proven ATACMS Missiles
  • US missile deal gives Poland Patriots, bolstered defence ties
  • Thales Successful In ESSM Live Firing Test
  • Missile Successfully Launches From Vandenberg

  • Russia says Europe in new arms race
  • US, Poland sign missile shield deal amid Russian opposition
  • Rice arrives in Warsaw to sign US-Polish missile deal
  • Poland won't be intimidated over US missiles: president

  • The M2-F1 - An Aircraft Without Wings
  • China's Tianjin building runway for Airbus test flights: report
  • NASA evaluates new wing sensor
  • Russia And China May Co-Design New Passenger Plane

  • Stellar Team's SATURN Wins At The MoD Grand Challenge
  • AeroVironment To Develop Stealthy, Persistent, Perch And Stare UAS
  • Predator Passes 400,000 Flight Hours
  • Unmanned Vehicles Go Head-To-Head On Salisbury Plain

  • Dogs of War: More contractors in Iraq
  • Iraq PM demanding changes to US military deal: ally
  • Iraq-US pact puts troop pullout by 2011: negotiator
  • US troops may quit Iraqi cities from June: US official

  • GD To Produce Advanced Chemical Detection Systems For Ground Vehicles
  • LockMart Completes Life Extension Upgrades Of Long Range Radars For Romania
  • BAE Thermal Imagers To Improve Visibility On Special Ops Vehicles
  • Putin vows 24 billion dollars for Russian hi-tech: report

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement