. Military Space News .
Afghan Policeman Kills Five Brits, Calls Grow For Withdrawal

Former British minister urges troop withrawal from Afghanistan
Britain should withdraw its troops from Afghanistan, a former junior foreign minister said Wednesday, in a split with Prime Minister Gordon Brown's government over the drawn-out conflict. Labour lawmaker Kim Howells, who chairs a security watchdog, said billions of pounds could be saved from a phased troop withdrawal and redirected to defending Britain's borders from attacks by Al-Qaeda. "It would be better to bring home the great majority of our fighting men and women and concentrate, instead, on using the money saved to secure our own borders, (and) gather intelligence on terrorist activities inside Britain," he said, writing in the Guardian newspaper. Howells also called for an expansion of British intelligence operations abroad and greater co-operation with foreign intelligence services.

Howells, a foreign affairs minister between 2005 and 2008 with responsibility for Afghanistan, chairs the parliamentary intelligence committee that oversees the work of Britain's intelligence and security agencies. Britain has some 9,000 troops and is sending another 500 to the war-torn nation where 100,000 NATO and US soldiers are battling an increasingly violent Taliban resurgence. The conflict has killed 224 British soldiers since the 2001 US-led invasion, and is growing increasingly unpopular among the public, placing mounting pressure on Brown's Labour government over its commitment to the strategy.

Brown urged President Hamid Karzai on Monday to set out a "unifying programme" for Afghanistan and tackle corruption after he was handed a second term in office. Howells accused the Kabul government of "largely squandering the opportunity offered to it by the UN-led occupation". "Sooner rather than later a properly planned phased withdrawal of our forces from Helmand province has to be announced. If it is an answer that serves, also, to focus the minds of those in the Kabul government who have shown such a poverty of leadership over the past seven years, then so much the better." Howells said the international military involvement in Afghanistan had "subdued" Al-Qaeda's activities, but failed to destroy the organisation.

by Staff Writers
Kabul (AFP) Nov 5, 2009
A "rogue" Afghan policeman shot dead five British soldiers in Afghanistan Wednesday, raising new questions about the safety of coalition troops as world leaders work to boost training of local forces.

The Afghan attacker on Tuesday opened fire at a checkpoint in the Nad Ali district of southern Helmand province -- where the vast majority of Britain's nearly 9,000 troops are based -- before fleeing the scene.

The soldiers killed had been mentoring Afghan police and living at the checkpoint. Brown condemned the incident as "terrible and tragic".

"What we know is that the Taliban have claimed responsibility for this," Brown told lawmakers in London.

"It may be that the Taliban have used an Afghan police member or that they have infiltrated the Afghan police force," he added.

The killings underscored the increasing complexity of the eight-year war in Afghanistan, where Western military and political leaders have put NATO training of Afghan security forces as the heart of any future exit strategy.

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen refused to budge on his stance that NATO training of Afghan security forces must lie at the heart of any future exit strategy.

"I consider this an isolated incident and it does not change my position," Rasmussen said in an interview with AFP.

The top US military officer said the US-led mission in Afghanistan could resemble the troop "surge" in Iraq, possibly allowing a drawdown of troops in about two years.

"The timeline we've talked about is actually in a sense if I were to use the surge in Iraq, in 2006-2007, look where we are right now, sort of apply the same kind of time line to Afghanistan as best we can tell," Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at an event in Washington.

A British military spokesman said initial reports suggested that the Afghan policeman fired without warning.

"It's our understanding that one individual Afghan National Policeman, possibly in conjunction with another, went rogue. His motives and whereabouts are unknown at this time," he said.

British opposition leader David Cameron said the attack raised serious questions about the safety of British troops mentoring Afghan security forces.

But Brown, echoing the NATO line, said training programmes were crucial because they showed that international forces were helping Afghanistan to manage its own affairs.

General Stanley McChrystal, commander of the more than 100,000 NATO and US troops in Afghanistan, said the incident was being investigated jointly with Afghan authorities.

"We will not let this event deter our resolve to building a partnership with the Afghan National Security Forces to provide for Afghanistan's future," the general said in a statement."

Afghan President Hamid Karzai ordered an investigation and instructed interior ministry officials to "bring those responsible to justice".

Four of the soldiers were killed outright and a fifth died later of wounds, the NATO-run International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) said.

Six other soldiers were wounded, the statement added.

Three of the soldiers were from the Grenadier Guards and two were from the Royal Military Police.

The attack brings to 229 the number of British troops who have been killed since operations in Afghanistan began in October 2001. Of these, at least 193 were killed as a result of hostile action.

With 94 British soldiers now killed on active service this year -- 93 in Afghanistan and one in Iraq -- 2009 is the bloodiest year for the British armed forces since 1982 and the Falklands War with Argentina.

Brown has faced persistent questions over the scope and purpose of the British role in Afghanistan and whether troops were well-enough equipped.

Britain has around 9,000 troops based in troubled Helmand province, where they are battling Taliban insurgents. Brown has conditionally pledged another 500 troops for the mission.

burs-ft/lth

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
News From Across The Stans



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Street battles as Pakistan troops advance on Taliban
Islamabad (AFP) Nov 4, 2009
Pakistani troops were Wednesday locked in deadly street battles with Taliban fighters, pushing a ground offensive deeper into militant-held territory, the military said. A senior military official told AFP the army had "taken" the strategic town of Sararogha in the third week of fighting, while 30 Islamist insurgents were reported killed in the last 24 hours. Pakistan has vowed to quash ... read more







The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2009 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement