. Military Space News .
Russia urges Iran to agree nuclear deal soon

Russia must ignore Israeli pressure over missiles: Iran
Tehran (AFP) Nov 11, 2009 - Defence Minister Ahmad Vahidi said on Wednesday Russia must ignore pressure from Iran's arch-foe Israel and supply the Islamic republic with the advanced anti-aircraft missiles it has ordered. Vahidi urged Moscow to meet its contractual obligation towards Tehran and deliver the weapons. "We have a contract with Russia to buy S-300 missiles. I don't think it is right for Russia to be seen in the world as a country which does not fulfil its contractual obligations," Vahidi told the ILNA news agency. "Russia has to fulfil the contract and not be influenced by Zionist pressure," he added, referring to the Jewish state.

Last month Russia's Interfax news agency reported that Iran had not yet paid for the advanced anti-aircraft missiles. It said no payments have been made because Moscow has not given its final approval for the sale of S-300 missiles to Iran, a deal that set alarm bells ringing in the West. Under the contract, Russia would sell Iran five batteries of S-300PMU1 missiles for around 800 million dollars (530 million euros), Interfax reported. The S-300PMU1 - codenamed the SA-20 Gargoyle by NATO - is a mobile land-based system designed to shoot down aircraft and cruise missiles.

Western governments fear that Iran could use the system to boost defences around its atomic sites against a possible US or Israeli air strike aimed at preventing Tehran from pursuing what they suspect is a nuclear weapons project. Iran denies that its nuclear ambitions extend to manufacturing the bomb, and says the programme is purely peaceful and aimed at generating power for an increasing population. Moscow has never officially confirmed signing a missiles contract with Iran, but has repeatedly insisted it has the right to sell it "defensive" weapons systems.
by Staff Writers
Moscow (AFP) Nov 11, 2009
Russia urged Iran again on Wednesday to give a prompt and positive response to a UN-drafted plan aimed at easing international concern over Tehran's nuclear programme.

"We are counting on Tehran to give an official, positive response in the very near future," foreign ministry spokesman Andrei Nesterenko told journalists.

His comments came days after President Dmitry Medvedev repeated that fresh sanctions on Iran could not be ruled out if there were no forward progress in the standoff over Tehran's nuclear drive.

In Washington, the White House on Monday also pressed Iran to quickly respond to the deal, under which the Islamic Republic would send its uranium abroad for enrichment, or else risk fresh sanctions.

However the US envoy to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna said Monday that Washington wanted to give Iran "some space" in negotiations on the deal.

"We want to give Iran some space," the US official, Glyn Davies, said. "It's a tough decision."

The proposed Iran nuclear deal, thrashed out under IAEA auspices, calls for Iran to agree to ship most of its known low-enriched uranium -- about 1,200 kilogrammes -- to Russia for further enrichment.

The material will then be turned into fuel by France and sent back to Iran, in a bid to prevent Tehran further enriching the uranium itself in a suspected drive to develop nuclear weapons.

Many countries suspect Iran aims to produce nuclear weapons under cover of a civilian nuclear energy programme. Tehran insists its programme is for peaceful energy use only.

earlier related report
S.Korea deploys more warships after clash: sources
Seoul (AFP) Nov 11, 2009 - South Korea Wednesday sent two more warships to guard its disputed Yellow Sea border with North Korea, military sources said, a day after a naval clash raised tensions on the peninsula.

The sources told AFP the 1,800-ton patrol boats would "reinforce vigilance" along the sea border, where Seoul said a North Korean patrol boat was set ablaze Tuesday in an exchange of fire.

The defence ministry said it could not comment on operational matters.

Military sources quoted by newspapers said one North Korean sailor was killed and three wounded in the brief but fierce exchange of fire Tuesday, just over a week before US President Barack Obama arrives in Seoul as part of an Asian tour.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs called on the North to avoid any further actions "that could be seen as an escalation".

But Washington announced it was accepting an invitation to send an envoy to Pyongyang to try to bring the North back to nuclear disarmament talks. The State Department said the US envoy to North Korea, Stephen Bosworth, would probably visit before year-end.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, speaking in Singapore, confirmed the trip would go ahead despite the naval clash.

"We are obviously hoping that the situation does not escalate and we are encouraged by the calm reaction that has been present up until now," she told reporters at Asia-Pacific talks.

"But this does not in any way affect our decision to send Ambassador Bosworth. We think that is an important step that stands on its own."

Defence Minister Kim Tae-Young ordered army, navy and air force commanders along the border with the communist North to step up surveillance and respond immediately to any provocation.

However the government does not want the clash to damage cross-border relations, said presidential spokeswoman Kim Eun-Hye. After months of bellicose moves, the North has recently made overtures to Seoul and Washington.

Seoul said the North's boat ignored five warnings to turn back and then opened fire at a South Korean boat that had fired a warning shot. One or two South Korean boats then returned fire.

Officials could not confirm any North Korean casualties but said no South Koreans were hurt, although one South Korean boat was hit 15 times.

North Korea's military blamed the South for a "grave armed provocation". It said Seoul's ships had opened fire while its craft was north of the border, which was the scene of bloody battles in 1999 and 2002.

Some analysts said the North's leadership may be strengthening its bargaining hand in the upcoming talks with the United States by heightening tensions.

"The intrusion might have been pre-planned to raise tensions," Baek Seung-Joo of the Korea Institute for Defence Analyses told AFP.

But Baek said retaliation from the North for damage to its boat was relatively unlikely because of the South's superior naval firepower and because of the upcoming dialogue with the United States.

The top presidential aide for security affairs, Kim Sung-Hwan, told Yonhap news agency there were no signs of preparations for any retaliation.

"But the North may take its time, waiting for the best chance for retaliation. We're taking countermeasures," he said.

Cross-border tensions have been high for more than a year and the North has also angered the international community with missile test-launches, a walkout from six-party nuclear disarmament talks and a second atomic weapons test.

The United Nations tightened sanctions in response.

The North now says it is ready to rejoin the six-nation talks if the US discussions go well. Washington stresses the talks are intended only to bring Pyongyang back to the six-party forum, which also includes South Korea, Japan, China and Russia.

About 300 activists rallied in Seoul, torching portraits of North Korean leader Kim Jong-Il in protest at the naval clash.

Share This Article With Planet Earth
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit
YahooMyWebYahooMyWeb GoogleGoogle FacebookFacebook



Related Links
Learn about nuclear weapons doctrine and defense at SpaceWar.com
Learn about missile defense at SpaceWar.com
All about missiles at SpaceWar.com
Learn about the Superpowers of the 21st Century at SpaceWar.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


Clinton says nuclear race not in Iran's interest
Washington (AFP) Nov 10, 2009
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said pursuing nuclear weapons was not in Iran's own interest as she pressed for Tehran to accept a UN-backed deal. Clinton said in a television interview aired late Monday that the United States has many reasons for distrusting Iran, including its "support for terrorism," such as its backing for the Islamic movements Hezbollah and Hamas. ... read more







The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2009 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement